Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 323–336 | Cite as

National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure

  • Thilo Muthke
  • Karin Holm-mueller

Abstract

Benefit transfer, as a mean to transfer values from existing monetary valuation studies to new policy sites, has been in use for many years. This paper aims to analyze the forecasting quality of benefit transfer by applying a rigoroust-test – also referred to as Accuracy-t-test – that takes into account testing errors which were made in previous surveys. Beside the analysis of national benefit transfers based on two German contingent valuation studies additional efforts were made to investigate into the validity and accuracy of international benefit transfer by considering two Norwegian studies that employed a similar survey design.

benefit transfer contingent valuation method water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarskog, E.M.(1988),'Betalingsvilighet for ytterligere rensing av indre Oslofjord ',Rapport 871013-2.Oslo:Senter for Industriforskning.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J., R. Solow, E. Leamer, P. Portney, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993),'Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation ',Federal Register 58,4601-4614.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, D.N.(1999),'The Quick,the Cheap,and the Dirty.Benefit Transfer Approaches to the Non-Market Valuation of Coastal Water Quality in Costa Rica '.Dissertation No. 1993:03.Aas:Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Economics and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Bayerisches Landesamt fu ¨r Statistik (2001),'Regionalstatistischer Datenkatalog des Bundes und der La ¨nder '.Retrieved from http://www.bayern.de/LFSTAD/regionalstatistik/regio-stat.pdf on 3 March 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Bergland, O.,K. Magnussen and S. Navrud (1995),'Benefit Transfer:Testing for Accuracy and Reliability ',Discussion Paper 95-03.Aas:Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Economics and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Blamey, R.K., J.W. Bennett and M.D. Morrison (1999),'Yea-Saying in Contingent Valu-ation Surveys',Land Economics 75(1),126-141.Google Scholar
  7. Breivik, M. and K.G. Hem (1986),'Verdsetting av rensetiltak I Kristiansandsfjorden ', Rapport 830123-6.Oslo: Senter for Industriforskning.Google Scholar
  8. Brouwer, R. and F. Spaninks (1997),'The Validity of Transferring Environmental Benefits. Further Empirical Testing ',Working Paper GEC 97-20.London: CSERGE.Google Scholar
  9. Bundesministerium fu ¨r Umwelt,Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (1998),Umweltbewusst-sein in Deutschland.Ergebnisse einer repra ¨sentativen Bevo ¨lkerungsumfrage.Bonn: BMU 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Cansier, D.(1996),Umwelto ¨konomie.Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Dalgard, M.(1989),'Drammensvassdraget-en undersokelse av betalingsvillighet '.Rapport 881108-2.Oslo: Senter For Industriforskning.Google Scholar
  12. Desvouges, W.H., M.C. Naughton and G.R. Parson (1992),'Benefit Transfer.Conceptual Problems in Estimating Water Quality Benefits Using Existing Studies',Water Resources Research 28(3),675-683.Google Scholar
  13. Downing, TM. and T. Ozuna (1996),'Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Approach', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 316-322.Google Scholar
  14. Elsasser, P.(1996),'Der Erholungswert des Waldes.Moneta ¨re Bewertung der Erholungs-leistung ausgewa ¨hlter Wa ¨lder in Deutschland ',in Schriften zur Forsto ¨konomie,Volume 11.Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  15. Freemann III, A.M.(1993),The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values.Theory and Methods.Washington,DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  16. Kirchho, S., B.G. Colby and J.T. LaFrance (1997),'Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer.An Empirical Inquiry',Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 75-93.Google Scholar
  17. Kristo ´ferson, D. and S. Navrud,(2001),'Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer.Are We Per-forming the Wrong Test?',Discussion Paper #D-13/2001.Aas:Agricultural University of Norway,Department of Economics and Social Science.Google Scholar
  18. Loomis, J.B.(1992),'The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer. Benefit Function Transfer',Water Resources Research 28(3),701-705.Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson (1989),Using Surveys to Value Public Goods.The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington,DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  20. Schuirmann, D.J.(1987),'A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability',Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15(6),657-680.Google Scholar
  21. Statistisches Landesamt Nordrhein-Westfalen (1998),Einkommen privater Haushalte in Nordrhein-Westfalen 1998.Retrieved from http://www.lds.nrw.de/stat_nrw/land/daten/ d333evs.htm 15 February 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Statistisk Sentralbyra ¢ªNorwegen (2001),Income Account for Households 1986-1999.Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/05/01/ifhus_en/tab-2001-06-01-07-en.html on 15 February 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Wronka, T.C. and H. Thiele (2001),'Transfer von Umweltgu ¨terbewertungen.Mo ¨glichkeiten, Grenzen und empirische Evidenz',Working Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the GEWISOLA,Braunschweig,Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thilo Muthke
    • 1
  • Karin Holm-mueller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Agricultural Policy, Market Research and Economic SociologyRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University BonnGermany

Personalised recommendations