Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 295–306 | Cite as

Benefit Transfer: A Comparison of WTP for Air Quality between France and Germany

  • Anne Rozan


A contingent valuation study was carried out under similar conditions on two sites simultaneously: Strasbourg (France) and Kehl (Germany) in order to test the reliability of the benefit transfer method. On average, the air quality is approximately the same in the two cities. Using a transfer of the benefit function, we compared the direct estimated benefits from improved air quality with the transferred benefits in the same city. The originality of this test is that the valued good is the same in both cities, which means that the transfer is an “intra-site” transfer. However our findings show that the method of benefit transfer was not generally valid. Indeed inhabitants of Kehl declared a higher price for their state of health and air quality than inhabitants in Strasbourg. This result could be explained by a stronger sensitivity to environmental problems in Germany.

air pollution benefits transfer contingent valuation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberini A.,M. Cropper, F. Tsu-Tan, A. Krupnick, L. Jin-Tan, D. Shaw and W. Harrington (1997),'Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution in Developing Countries:The Case of Taiwan',Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34,107–126.Google Scholar
  2. Bergland O.,K. Magnussen and S. Navrud (1995),Benefit Transfer:Testing for Accuracy and Reliability,Discussion Paper #D-03/1995,The Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  3. Brouwer R.and F.A. Spaninks (1999),'The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing',Environmental and Resource Economics 14,91–117.Google Scholar
  4. Chow G.(1960),'Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coeffcients in Two Linear Regressions', Econometrica 28,591–605.Google Scholar
  5. Delquie ´P.(1993),'Inconsistent Trade-offs Between Attributes:New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases',Management Science 39(11),1382–1395.Google Scholar
  6. Downing M.and T. Ozuna (1996),'Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach',Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30,316–322.Google Scholar
  7. Greene W.H.(1997),Econometric Analysis,3rd ed.Upper Saddle River,New Jersey: Prentice Hall,1075 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Grenier P.and S. Jacobzone (1996),'Comportement de pre ´vention,consommation d' alcool et tabagie:peut-on parler d' une gestion globale du capital sante ´?',Une mode ´lisation microe ´conome ´trique empirique,Document de travail INSEE,48 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Kirchhoff S.,B. Colby and J. LaFrance (1997),'Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer:an Empirical Enquiry',Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 75–93.Google Scholar
  10. Krupnick A.,K. Harrison, E. Nickell and M. Toman (1996),'The Value of Health Bene ts from Ambient Air Quality Improvements in Central and Eastern Europe:An Exercise in Bene ts Transfer',Environmental and Resource Economics 7,307–332.Google Scholar
  11. Loehman E.T.,S. Berg, A. Arroyo, R. Hedinger, J. Schwartz, M. Shaw, V. De, D. Rio, W. Rossley and A. Green (1979),'Distributional Analysis of Regional Benefits and Cost of Air Quality Control',Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 6,222–243.Google Scholar
  12. Navrud S.(1998),Valuing Health Impacts from Air Pollution in Europe:New Empirical Evidence on Morbidity,Discussion Paper #D-04/1998,The Agrigultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  13. Poe G.L.,E.K. Severance-Lossin and M.P. Welsch (1994),'Measuring the difference (X )Y )of Simulated Distributions:A Convolutions Approach',American Journal Agriculture and Economics 76,904–915.Google Scholar
  14. Rozan A.(1999),Contingent Valuation of Health Benefits Induced by Air Pollution:The Example of the Region of Strasbourg,PhD Thesis,University Louis Pasteur,Strasbourg I.Google Scholar
  15. Rozan A.(2000a),'Une E ´valuation E ´conomique des Be ´ne ´ces de Morbidite ´Induits par une Ame ´lioration de la Qualite ´de l' air’,Economie et Pre ´vision 143144,247–259.Google Scholar
  16. Rozan A.(2000b),'Diffe ´rences Culturelles Face a`un Mëme Actif Environnemental:Une Comparaison Franco-allemande des Consentements a`Payer Pour une Ame ´lioration de la Qualite ´de l' air',Re ´gion et De ´veloppement 12,79–104.Google Scholar
  17. Rozan A.,A. Stenger and M. Willinger (1999),'Valeur de Pre ´servation et Transfe ´rabilite ´ Intra-site et Inter-site:Application a`la Nappe Phre ´atique d' Alsace',in P. Point,ed.,La Valeur e ´conomique des hydrosyste`mes.Me ´thodes et mode`les d' e ´valuations des services de ´livre ´s,Economica,January.Google Scholar
  18. Schkade D.A.and J.W. Payne (1993),'Where Do the Numbers Come From?How People Respond to CV',in J.A. Hausman,ed.,Contingent Valuation:A Critical Assessment (pp.271–304).Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Smith V.K.and J.C. Huang (1993),'Hedonic Models and Air Pollution.Twenty-Five Years and Counting',Environmental and Resource Economics 3,381–394.Google Scholar
  20. Tolley G., L. Babcock, M. Berger, A. Bilotti, G. Blomquist, M. Brien, R. Fabian, G. Fishelson, C. Kahn, A. Kelly, D. Kenkel, R. Krumm, T. Miller, R. Oshfeldt, S. Rosen, W. Webb, W. Wilson and M. Zelder (1986),Valuation of Reductions in Human Health Symptoms and Risks.Report for USEPA grant #CR-811053-01-0,US.EPA,Washington DC.Google Scholar
  21. Tolley G.,D. Kenkel and R. Fabian (1994),Valuing Health for Policy;an Economic Approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Rozan
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA UMR 7522)University Louis PasteurFrance

Personalised recommendations