Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 131–163

Valuing Air Quality in Poland

  • Dominika Anna Parry Dziegielewska
  • Robert Mendelsohn
Article

Abstract

In this study we estimate how much Polish citizens would be willing to pay to harmonize Polish air pollution standards with EU standards. We conduct a contingent valuation of all damage components using a system of dichotomous choice questions. This system approach helps to avoid embedding problem and to identify protest voters. We compare estimates from a set of single logit models with a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, which provides more parsimonious and efficient estimates. Although, health remains very important, our respondents valued mortality less than the literature but morbidity much more. Damages to ecosystems and cultural heritage compose 13–16% of the total value and their omission by the literature seriously underestimates total benefits. Overall, the results suggest that Poland values the benefits of pollution control much less than the wealthier EU suggesting harmonization should be postponed and conditioned on economic prosperity.

Keywords

air pollution EU enlargement Poland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abt Associates Inc. (1992), The Medical Cost of Five Illnesses Related to Exposure to Pollutants. Prepared for EPA, Office of Pollution Preservation and Toxics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Alberini, A., M. L. Cropper., A. Krupnick, and N. S. Simon (2002), Willingness to Pay for Future Risks: How Much Does Latency Matter?, Paper Presented at 2nd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.Google Scholar
  3. Berbeka, K. (1997), ‘Korzysci ekologiczne jako jeden z faktow czlonkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej’,Ekonomia i Srodowisko1 (10).Google Scholar
  4. Berbeka, K., Peszko, G. 1997‘Monetary Valuation of Benefits of Traffic Calming in the Old City of Krakow. A Contingent Valuation Study’Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment at the University College.London, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle K. J., J., Bergstrom, C. 1992‘Benefit Transfer Studies: Myths, Pragmatism and Idealism’Water Resources Research28657663Google Scholar
  6. Brookshire, D.S., Crocker, T.D., D’Arge, R.C. 1979‘Methods Development for Assessing Air Pollution Control Benefits’ Vol 2 Experiments in Valuing Non-Market Goods: Case Study of Alternative Benefits Measures of Air Pollution in the South Coast Basin of Southern California.Prepared for the USEPAWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookshire, D. S., Neill, H. R. 1992‘Benefit Transfers: Conceptual and Empirical Issues’Water Resources Research28651665Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. and M. Smith (1984), ‘Crop substitution in the Estimation of Economic Benefits Due to Ozone Reduction’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11 (4).Google Scholar
  9. Butler, R. J. 1983

    ‘Wage and Injury Rate Responses to Shifting Levels of Workers Compensation’

    Worrall, J.D. eds. Safety and the Work ForceCornell University, ILR PressIthaca, New York
    Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, T. A., James, M. D. 1987‘Efficient Estimation Methods for “Close–Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys’The Review of Economics and Statistic69269276Google Scholar
  11. Cameron, T. A. 1988‘A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management15355379Google Scholar
  12. Carson, R. T, Mitchell, R. C. 1995‘Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management28155173Google Scholar
  13. Carson, R., Flores, N., Hanemann, W. M. 1992‘On Creation and Destruction of Public Goods: The Matter of Sequencing’,University of CaliforniaAgricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley, CaliforniaWorking Paper 690Google Scholar
  14. Chestnut, L. and R. Rowe (1990), ‘Preservation Values for Visibility Protection at the National Parks’. Report prepared for USEPA.Google Scholar
  15. Chestnut, L., J. K. Lazo, R. Rowe, and W. Schulze (2002), ‘Economic Valuation of Mortality Risk Reduction’. Paper presented at 2nd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.Google Scholar
  16. Council of the European Union1999‘Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the Limitation of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds Due to the Use of Organic Solvents in Certain Activities and Installations’Official Journal29122Google Scholar
  17. Cropper, M. L. and A. M. III Freeman (1989), ‘Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control: A Discussion’. CRS Report for Congress, No. 89–161 ENR.Google Scholar
  18. Cropper, M. L. and A. Krupnick (1990), ‘The Social Cost of Chronic Heart and Lung Disease’. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper, QE 89–16-REV.Google Scholar
  19. Cropper, M. L. and F. G. Sussman (1990), ‘Valuing Future Risks to Life’, Journal of Economic Review 88 (2).Google Scholar
  20. Desvousges, W. H. 1993

    ‘Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability’

    Hausman, J.A. eds. Contingent Valuation:A Critical Assessment. Contributions to Economic AnalysisElsevier ScienceNew YorkVol. 220
    Google Scholar
  21. Desvousges, W., H., M., Naugton, C.,  et al. 1992‘Benefit Transfer: Conceptual Problems in Estimating Water Quality Benefits Using Existing Studies’Water Resources Research28675683Google Scholar
  22. Desvouges, W. H.,  et al. 1998Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method.Edward ElgarCheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Diamond, D. B., Hausman, J. A. 1994‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?’Journal of Economic Perspectives84564Google Scholar
  24. Dickie, M., S. D. Gerking, D. S. Brookshire, D. L. Coursey, W. D. Schulze, A. Coulson and D. Tashkin (1987) ‘Improving Accuracy and Reducing Costs of Environmental Benefits Assessments, Reconciling Averting Behavior and Contingent Valuation Benefits Estimates of Reducing Symptoms of Ozone Exposure’. EE-0285G, USEPA (http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwRepNumLookup/EE-0285G?OpenDocument).Google Scholar
  25. Dickie, M. and S. Gerking (1991), ‘Willingness to Pay for Ozone Control: Inferences from Demand for Medical Care’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21.Google Scholar
  26. Dillingham, A. 1985‘The Influence of Risk Variable Definition on Value of Life Estimates’Economics Inquiry24277294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dziegielewska, D. A. (2003), ‘Essays on Contingent Valuation and Air Quality in Poland’,UMI Number: 3084281.Google Scholar
  28. Dziegielewska, D. A. and R. Mendelsohn (2002), ‘Does “No” Mean “No”? Protest Responses and Contingent Valuation’. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  29. EDC Ltd. EPE absl. AEA Technology, and WRc (1999) Approximation of Environmental Legislation: A Study of the Benefits Compliance with the EU Environmental Acquis.Google Scholar
  30. Ecotech (2001), The Benefits of Compliance with the EU Environmental Acquis for the Candidate Countries (http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enlarg/benefit_en.htm).Google Scholar
  31. Elixhouser, A., J. M. Weschler, J. L. Kitzmiller, J. S. Marks, H. W. Bennert, Jr. and D. R. Coustan (1993), ‘Clinical Classifications for Health Policy Research: Discharge Statistics by Principal Diagnosis and Procedure’, after USEPA, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Fairley, D. 1990‘The Relationship fo daily mortality to suspended particulates in Santa Clara County, 1980–1986’Environmental Health Perspective89159168Google Scholar
  33. Forster, B.A. 1984‘An Economic Assessment of the Significance of Long-Range Transported Air Pollution for Agriculture in Eastern Canada’Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics323Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, M. F.,III. 1982Air and Water Pollution ControlJohn WileyNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Freeman, M. (1979a), ‘Hedonic Prices, Property Values and Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Survey of the Issues’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81 (2).Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, M. 1979b‘Economic Valuation of Shoreline: A Comment’Review of Economics and Statistic6163435Google Scholar
  37. Garrod, G., Willis, K.G. 1999Economic Valuation of the EnvironmentEdwar ElgarCheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Gillbert, A., R. Glass and T. More (1991), ‘Valuation of Eastern Wilderness: Extramarker Measures of Public Support’. in The Economic Value of Wilderness. Research Triangle Park.Google Scholar
  39. Grosculaude, P., Soguel, N. C. 1994‘Valuing Damage to Historic Buildings Using a Contingent Market: A Case Study of Road Traffic Externalities’Journal of Environmental Planning and Management3727987Google Scholar
  40. Graves, P.,.,  et al. 1988‘The Robustness of Hedonic Price Estimation: Urban Air Quality’Land Economics64220233Google Scholar
  41. Greene, W.H. 2000Econometric AnalysisPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. Halstead, J.M.,  et al. 1992‘Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation’Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economic21332341Google Scholar
  43. Halvorsen, B. (1996), ‘Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Willingness to Pay for Reduced Health Damage from Air Pollution’, Environmental and Resource Economics 8.Google Scholar
  44. Hanemann, W. M. 1984‘Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses’American Journal of Agricultural Economic6618284Google Scholar
  45. Hanemann, W.M. and B. Kanninen (1996), ‘The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data’, Working paper.Google Scholar
  46. Harrison, D., Rubinfeld, D. L. 1978a‘Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management581102Google Scholar
  47. Harrison, D., Rubinfeld, D. L. 1978b‘Air Pollution and Property Value Debate’Review of Economics and Statistics60100104Google Scholar
  48. Hoehn, J. P., Randall, A. 1989‘Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit Cost Test’The American Economic Review79544551Google Scholar
  49. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. 2000Applied Logistic RegressionWiley- InterscienceNewyorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Hughes G. and J. Bucknall (1999), ‘Complying with the EU Environmental Legislation’. World Bank Technical Paper. No. 454, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  51. Industrial Economics Incorporated (1993), ‘Review of Existing Value of Morbidity Avoidance Estimates’. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  52. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. 1992‘Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management225770Google Scholar
  53. Kneisner, T. J., Leeth, J. D. 1991‘Compensating Wage Differentials for Fatal Injury Risk in Australia, Japan and the United States’Journal of Risk and Uncertainty47590Google Scholar
  54. Krupnick, A. J., Cropper, M. L. 1992‘The Effects of Information on Health Risk Valuations’Journal of Risk and Uncertainty52948Google Scholar
  55. Krupnick, A. J.,  et al. 1996‘The Value of Health Benefits from Ambient Air Quality Improvements in Central and Eastern Europe: An Exercise in Benefit Transfer’Environmental and Resources Economics7307332Google Scholar
  56. Krupnick, A. J., A. Alberini, M. Cropper, N. Simon, K. Itaoka and M. Akai (1999), ‘Mortality Risk Valuation for Environmental Policy’. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  57. Loehman, E. T., S. Park and D. Boldt (1994), ‘Willingness to Pay for Gains and Looses in Visibility and Health’, Land Economics 70 (4).Google Scholar
  58. Loehman, E. T., D. Boldt, K. Chaikin (1984), ‘Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Changes in the San Francisco Bay Area’. Prepared for USEPA.Google Scholar
  59. Linzon, S. N., Pearson, R. G., Donnan, J. A., Durham, F. N. 1984‘Ozone Effects on Crops in Ontario and Related Monetary Values’Ministry of the EnvironmentOntarioGoogle Scholar
  60. Mansfield, C. and T. Wilcosky (2002), ‘The Cost of Asthma: Cost of Illness Estimates of Acute Asthma Episodes’. Paper Presented at 2nd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.Google Scholar
  61. Markowska, A., Zylicz, T. 1999‘Costing an international public good: the case of the Baltic Sea’Ecological Economics3030116Google Scholar
  62. McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze, D. Waldman, D. Schenk, J. R. Irwin, T. Stewart, L. Deck and M. A. Thayer (1991), ‘Valuing Eastern Visibility: a Field Test of the Contingent Valuation Method’. Prepared for Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, USEPA (http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/0/0ACEE433C8B218538525643C007E4020?Open Document).Google Scholar
  63. McConnel, K. E. 1992‘Model Building and Judgment: Implications for Benefit Transfer with Travel Cost’Water Resources Research28695700Google Scholar
  64. McFadden, D. 1974‘The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand’Journal of Public Economics3303328Google Scholar
  65. Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic (1998), SLO 101–Development of a Costing Assessment for the Slovenia Environmental Approximation Strategy.Google Scholar
  66. Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry, Poland (1998), POL 101–Costing and Financial Analysis of Approximation in Environment.Google Scholar
  67. Moore, M. J., Viscusi, W. K. 1988‘Doubling the Estimated Value of Life: Results Using New Occupational Fatality Data’Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7369388Google Scholar
  68. O’Conor, R.M., Bloomquist, G.C. 1997‘Measurement of Consumer-Patient Preferences Using a Hybrid Contingent Valuation Method’Journal of Health Economics1666783Google Scholar
  69. O’Doherty, R.K. 1995‘A Review of Benefit Transfer: Why and How?’British Review of Economic Issue17115Google Scholar
  70. OECD (2003) OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Poland (http://oecdpublications. gfi-nb.com/cgi-bin/OECDBookShop.storefront/EN/product/972003061P1).Google Scholar
  71. Ostro, B. (1995), ‘Estimating the Health Effects of Air Pollutants. A Method with an Application to Jakarta’.Google Scholar
  72. Palmquist, R. 1984‘Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing’The Review of Economics and Statistics77394403Google Scholar
  73. Palmquist, R., Israngkura,  1999‘Valuing Air Quality with Hedonic and Discrete Choice Models’American Journal of Agriculture Economics511281133Google Scholar
  74. Pearson, R. G. 1982‘Oxidant effects on agricultural crops in Ontario’Ministry of the EnvironmentOntarioGoogle Scholar
  75. Plagiannakos, T and J. Parker (1988), ‘An assessment of air pollution effects on human health in Ontario’, Ontario Hydro, March.Google Scholar
  76. Pope, C.A.,3rd, Thun, M. J., Namboodiri, M.M., Dockery, D.W., Evans, J.S., Speizer, F.E., Heath, C.W.,Jr. 1995‘Particulate Air Pollution as a Predictor of Mortality in a Prospective Study of US Adults’American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine151669674Google Scholar
  77. Rae, D. A. 1983

    ‘The value to visitors of improving visibility at Mesa Verde and Great Smoky National Parks’

    Rowe, R.Chestnut, L. eds. Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Park and Wilderness AreasWestview PressBoulder, Colorado
    Google Scholar
  78. Randall, A., Ives, B., Eastman, C. 1974‘Bidding Games for Valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management1132149Google Scholar
  79. Rowe, R. D. and L. G. Chestnut (1985/86) Oxidians and Asthmatics in Los Angeles: A Benefit Analysis. Report to EPA, Office of Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  80. Schulze, W. D., Brookshire, D. S., Walther, E. G., MacFarland, K. K., Thayer, M. A., Whitworth, R. L., Ben-David, S., Malm, W., Molenar, J. 1983‘The Economic Benefits of Preserving Visibility in the National Parklands of the Southwest’Natural Resource Journal23149173Google Scholar
  81. Schulze, W. D., McClelland, G.H., Lazo, J.K., Rowe, R.D. 1998‘Embedding and Calibration in Measuring Non-Use Values’Resources and Energy Economics20163178Google Scholar
  82. Schulze, W. D., Brookshire, D.S., Walther, E.G., MacFarland, K.K., Thayer, M.A., Whitworth, R.L., Ben-David, S., Malm, W., Molenar, J. 1983‘The Economic Benefits of Preserving Visibility in the National Parklands of the Southwest’Natural Resources Journal2314973Google Scholar
  83. Schwartz, J., Dockery, D. W. 1992a‘Increase Mortality in Philadelphia associated with Daily Air Pollution Concentration’American Review of Respiratory Diseases145600604Google Scholar
  84. Schwartz, J., Dockery, D. W. 1992b‘Particulate Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Steubenville, Ohio’American Journal of Epidemiology1351220Google Scholar
  85. Smith, K. V. 1976The Occupational Safety and Health Act: Its Goals and AchievementsAmerican Enterprise InstituteWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, K. V. 1992‘On Separating Defensible Benefit Transfers from “Smoke and Mirrors”Water Resources Research2868594Google Scholar
  87. Smith, K. V. (1996), ‘Can Contingent Valuation Distinguish Economic Values for Different Public Goods’, Land Economics 72 (2).Google Scholar
  88. Smith, K. V., Gilbert, C. 1984‘The Implicit Risk to Life: A Comparative Analysis’Economics Letters16393399Google Scholar
  89. Smith, K. V., Huang, J. 1995‘Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Models’Journal of Political Economy103209227Google Scholar
  90. Toley, G. S., A. Randall, G. Bloomquist, R. Fabian, G. Fishelson, A. Frankel, J. P. Hoehn, R. Krumm, E. Mensah and V. K. Smith (1986a), Valuation of Reductions in Human Health Symptoms and Risks. University of Chicago. Final Report for the USEPA.Google Scholar
  91. Toley, G. S., A. Randall, G. Bloomquist, R. Fabian, G. Fishelson, A. Frankel, J. P. Hoehn, R. Krumm, E. Mensah and V. K. Smith (1986b) Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in Eastern United States. Prepared for the USEPA.Google Scholar
  92. USEPA (1997a), The Benefits and Cost of Clean Air Act, 1970–1990. Office of Air and Radiation.Google Scholar
  93. USEPA (1997b), Regulatory Impact Analyses for Ozone and Particulates. Office of Air and Radiation (http://www.airimpacts.org/documents/local/coveretc.pdf).Google Scholar
  94. USEPA (1999), The Benefits and Cost of Clean Air Act, 1970–1990. Office of Air and Radiation (http://www.epa.gov/air/sect812/copy99.html).Google Scholar
  95. Waddel, T. E. 1974The Economic Damages of Air PollutionUSEPAWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  96. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel DataThe MIT PressCambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  97. Viscusi, W.K. 1978‘Labor Market Valuation of Life and Limb: Empirical Estimates and Policy Implications’Public Policy26359386Google Scholar
  98. Viscusi, W. K. 1979Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market PerformanceHarvard University PressCambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  99. Viscusi, W. K. 1992Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for RiskOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  100. Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., Huber, J. 1991‘Pricing Environmental Health Risks: Survey Assessments of Risk-Risk and Risk-dollar Tradeoffs’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management203251Google Scholar
  101. Zeger, S. L., Liang, K. Y., Albert, P. A. 1988‘Models for Longitudinal Data: a Generalized Estimating Equations Approach’Biometrics865319Google Scholar
  102. Zylicz, T. 1994‘Environmental Policy Reform in Poland’, in TKluwer Academic PublishersSterner ed., Economic Policies for Sustainable Development. Dovdvecht, Hingham, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  103. Zylicz, T. 2000Costing Nature in a Transition Economy: Case Studies in PolandEdward ElgarCheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  104. Zylicz, T., I. Bateman, S. Georgiou, A. Markowska, D. Dziegielewska, R. K. Turner, A. Graham, I. Langford (1995), ‘The Baltic Drainage Basin Project: Contingent Valuation of Eutrophication Damage in the Baltic Sea Region’, CSERGE, Working Paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominika Anna Parry Dziegielewska
    • 1
  • Robert Mendelsohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNew Haven

Personalised recommendations