Advertisement

Augmented reality instructional tool in enhancing geography learners academic performance and retention in Osun state Nigeria

  • Nafisat A. Adedokun-Shittu
  • Adedeji Hammed AjaniEmail author
  • Kehinde Muritala Nuhu
  • AbdulJaleel Kehinde Shittu
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The emergence of new technological innovations in classroom has brought about greater changes in pedagogy especially in concepts related to abstraction such as Geography. Geography teaching and learning particularly elements of physical Geography, is mostly approached in a conventional pedagogical manner even as the concept consist abstractions. Physical Geography comprise abstractions leading to students’ conceptual difficulties, leading to poor academic performance and low retention. On this basis, this study engaged a visualisation technology; Augmented Reality Instructional Tool (ARIT) to examine Geography learners’ performance and retention when they are exposed to its’ use in learning Physical Geography concepts. Four research questions were answered, while, one hypothesis was tested at 0.05 level of significance. A mixed method research approach of an experimental and survey designs was adopted. A multistage sampled intact class served as the participants. Three test instruments: an open-sourced AR mobile application (ARSJA); an adopted performance and retention test on physical geography (PRTPG); and a validated 7-Item questionnaire with a reliability value of 0.82 were employed as the research instrument. A retention rubric adopted based on Brown-Peterson Task of Memory was used as the qualitative content analysis tool. The major finding of the study was that ARIT enhances learners’ performance and retention, and equally embrace gender equality. The study concluded, that the teaching and learning of Geography can be enhanced with the use of ARIT.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Instructional Tool Geography Academic Retention Performance Reaction Brown Peterson Scale 

Notes

References

  1. Abanikannda, M. O. (2017). Towards enhancing quality learning among undergraduate students in Nigeria's universities: The place of social media networking. Proceedings of the 2017 Association for Innovative Technology Integration in Education Conference; That All May Integrate Technology for Instruction, (pp. 13-21).Google Scholar
  2. Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., Mohammed, A.-A., & Abdu, D. (2017a). The impact of technology integration on senior secondary school Students' performance in biology in Gombe state, Nigeria. Proceedings of the 2017 Association for Innovative Technology Integration in education Conference; That All May Integrate Technology for Instruction, (pp. 169-174).Google Scholar
  3. Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., Olasehinde-Williams, F. A., Obielodan, O. O., & Salawu, M. O. (2017b). TechTeaching? The good, the bad, and the ugly. Proceedings of the 2017 Association for Innovative Technology Integration in Education Conference; That All May Integrate Technology for Instruction, (pp. 197-204).Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad, Y. (2014). Effects of Field-Trip on Retention and Academic Achievement in Ecology among Secondary School Students in Zaria, Nigeria. Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation. Zaria: Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Ahmadu Bello University. Zaria. Nigeria.Google Scholar
  5. Ajani, H. A. (2018). Effect of ARIT on Students' performance and retention in selected geography concepts in Osun state, Nigeria. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis. Ilorin: Department of Educational Technology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  6. Annetta, L., Burton, E. P., Frazier, W., Cheng, R., & Chmiel, M. (2012). Augmented reality games: Using technology on a budget. Science Scope., 36(3), 54–60.Google Scholar
  7. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149 Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/9.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Bakar, N. A., Zulkifli, A. N., & Mohamed, N. F. (2011). The use of multimedia, Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Environment (VE) in enhancing children’s understanding of road safety. 2011 IEEE conference on open systems (pp. 149-154). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOS.2011.6079288.
  9. Chen, C. H., & Su, C. C. (2011). Developing an augmented painting interface for enhancing children painting experience. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 5(1), 319–327 Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.09954545610&partnerID=40&md5=ea66d36aae30afec6111b88dc86d0346.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90, 1073–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dzever, L. T. (2015). The impact of home environment factors on academic performance of secondary school students in Garki area district, Abuja, Nigeria. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 66-92.Google Scholar
  13. EDUCAUSE. (2005). 7 things you should know about augmented reality. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/eli.
  14. Federal Republic of Nigeria. FRN, (2013). National policy on education. 6th Lagos: NERDC.Google Scholar
  15. Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013). An augmented reality environment for astronomy learning in elementary grades. An Exploratory Study.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2534903.2534907.
  16. Hay, K. E., Marlino, M., & Hosehuh, D. R. (2000). The virtual Exploratorium: Foundational research and theory on the integration of 5-D and visualization in undergraduate geoscience education. International Conferences of the Learning Science (pp. 214-220). University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  17. Ibáñez, M., Delgado, C., Leony, D., García, J. J., & Maroto, D. (2011). Learning a foreign language in a mixed-reality environment. IEEE Internet Computing, 15(6), 44–47 Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5892930&tag=1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Irawati, S., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2008). 3D edutainment environment: learning physics through VR/AR experiences. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, (pp. 21-121). Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1510000/1501755/p21-irawati.pdf.
  19. Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). Simple Augmented Reality. The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  20. Kamat, V. R., & El-Tawil, S. (2005). Evaluation of augmented reality for rapid assessment of earthquake-induced building damage. Computing in Civil Engineering, 21(5), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufmann, H., & Papp, M. (2017). Learning objects for education with augmented reality. Austria: Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Austria.Google Scholar
  22. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Selje, S., & Woolard, A. (2017). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. London: IDEAs Lab, Department of Informatics.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, K. (2013). Augmented reality in education and training (Vol. 56). Fort Collins: University of Northern Colorado & KOSHA.Google Scholar
  24. Lin, H. C., Hsieh, M. C., Wang, C. H., Sie, Z. Y., & Chang, S. H. (2011). Establishment and usability evaluation of an interactive AR learning system on conservation of fish. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 181–187.Google Scholar
  25. Marques, D. C. (2017). The Visitor Experience Using Augmented Reality on Mobile Devices in Museum Exhibitions. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
  26. Matsutomo, S., Miyauchi, T., Noguchi, S., & Yamashita, H. (2012). Real-time visualization system of magnetic field utilizing augmented reality Technology for Education. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2174208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nor, F. S., Noor, D. A., & Noraffandy, Y. (2015). A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications. International Education Studies, 8(13), 1–8.Google Scholar
  28. Osman, K., Haji-Iksan, Z., & Halim, L. (2007). Sikap terhadap Sains dan Sikap Saintifik di kalangan pelajar Sains. Journal Pendidikan, 32, 39–60.Google Scholar
  29. Pérez-López, D., & Contero, M. (2013). Delivering educational multimedia contents through augmented reality application: A case study on its impact on knowledge acquisition and retention. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 20–28.Google Scholar
  30. Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533–1543.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts, G. W., Evans, A., Dodson, A., Denby, B., Cooper, S., & Hollands, R. (2002). The Use of Augmented Reality, GPS, and INS for Subsurface Data Visualization. In Proceedings of FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. The First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop (pp. 1-8). Darmstadt, Germany: IEEE.Google Scholar
  33. Tijani, O. (2009). Impact of 2 ICT Presentation Modes on Students ‘Learning Outcomes in S.S.C.E Economics in Oyo state, Nigeria. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis, Ibadan: Teacher education department, University of Ibadan, Nig.Google Scholar
  34. Tsai, C.-H., & Yen, J.-C. (2014). The augmented reality application of multimedia Technology in Aquatic Organisms Instruction. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 7, 745–755.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2014.79069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, X. (2012). Augmented reality: A new way of augmented learning (Vol. 10). eLearn.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2380716.2380717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. West African Examinations Council, WAEC. (2016-2019). Chief examiners’ report. Lagos: West African Examinations Council.Google Scholar
  37. Wu, H. K., Krajnick, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yasak, Z., Yamhari, S., & Esa, A. (2010). Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Mengajar Sains di Sekolah Rendah.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Technology DepartmentUniversity of IlorinIlorinNigeria
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentFountain UniversityOsogboNigeria

Personalised recommendations