Advertisement

Virtual educational environment: interactive communication using LMS Moodle

  • Nurassyl KerimbayevEmail author
  • Nurdaulet Nurym
  • Аliya Akramova
  • Saule Abdykarimova
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

The study considers the problems relating to vocational training of specialists in the virtual educational environment of a higher education institution. The use of advanced information and communication systems (electronic mail, electronic teleconferences, electronic and information resources including text, visual, audio and video information) and virtual technology (Daydream, Vive VR, technology of virtual games) in the educational process of a higher education institution enables to realize an interactive communication of the participants of this process. The article presents the experience on introduction of the virtual educational environment using LMS Moodle, and the authors consider the influence of such environment on the interactive engagement of the students and teachers from the universities in Kazakhstan and Slovakia. We have tried to demonstrate how the LMS Moodle platform helps arrange e-learning, conduct lessons in electronic classrooms, take online courses, and conduct synchronous and asynchronous learning. The developed online tasks allowed for the monitoring of the students’ progress in all the educational activities. The results of the experiment helped guide the choice of follow-up study in this area.

Keywords

Virtual educational environment Interactive communication E-learning LMS ICT Virtual learning 

Notes

References

  1. Achuthan, K., Kolil, V. K., & Diwakar, S. (2018). Using virtual laboratories in chemistry classrooms as interactive tools towards modifying alternate conceptions in molecular symmetry. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2499–2515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9727-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco, M., & Ginovart, M. (2012). On how Moodle quizzes can contribute to the formative e-assessment of first-year engineering students in mathematics courses. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 9, 354.  https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i1.1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogdanov, E., Ullrich, C., Isaksson, E., Palmér, M., & Gillet, D. (2012, September). From LMS to PLE: A step forward through opensocial apps in moodle. International Conference on Web-Based Learning, 69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33642-3_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borba, M. C., Chiari, A. S., & de Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning environments: New roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98, 269–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9812-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Echeverria, L., Cobos, R., & Morales, M. (2013). Designing and evaluating collaborative learning scenarios in Moodle LMS courses. In International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering (pp. 61–66). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El Mawas, N., Oubahssi, L., & Laforcade, P. (2016). A method for making explicit LMS instructional design languages. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 10(3).Google Scholar
  8. Genci, J. (2013). Methods to ensure higher variability of knowledge tests in the moodle LMS environment. Emerging Trends in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, and Engineering, 447–453.Google Scholar
  9. Herrador-Alcaide, T.C., Hernández-Solís, M. & Sanguino Galván, R. (2019) Feelings of satisfaction in mature students of financial accounting in a virtual learning environment: an experience of measurement in higher education International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16: 20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0148-z, Feelings of satisfaction in mature students of financial accounting in a virtual learning environment: an experience of measurement in higher education, 19.
  10. Kerimbayev, N. (2019). Formats of virtual learning. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies. Cham , Formation Technologies: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_201-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerimbayev, N., Akramova, A., & Suleimenova, J. (2016). E-learning for ungraded schools of Kazakhstan: Experience, implementation, and innovation. Education and Information Technologies, 21(2), 443–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9331-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kerimbayev, N., Kultan, J., Abdykarimova, S., & Akramova, A. (2017). LMS Moodle: Distance international education in cooperation of higher education institutions of different countries. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2125–2139.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9534-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Konstantinidis, A., Tsiatsos, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2009). Collaborative virtual learning environments: Design and evaluation. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 44, 279–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0289-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyashenko, M. S., & Frolova, N. H. (2014). LMS projects: A platform for intergenerational e-learning collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 19(3), 495–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9333-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mavengere, N., & Ruohonen, M. (2018). Context and user needs in virtual learning in pursuit of qualities of learning. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1607–1620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9681-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mpungose, C. B. (2019). Is Moodle or WhatsApp the preferred e-learning platform at a South African university? First-year students’ experiences. Education and information technologies, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10005-5.
  17. Nurakun Kyzy, Z., Ismailova, R., & Dündar, H. (2018). Learning management system implementation: A case study in the Kyrgyz Republic. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1010–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oh, E. G., Huang, W. H. D., Mehdiabadi, A. H., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: Comparison between peer-and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shang, H. F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stahre Wästberg, B., Eriksson, T., Karlsson, G., Sunnerstam, M., Axelsson, M., & Billger, M. (2019). Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2059–2080.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09857-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nurassyl Kerimbayev
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nurdaulet Nurym
    • 1
  • Аliya Akramova
    • 2
  • Saule Abdykarimova
    • 3
  1. 1.al-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Almaty UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  3. 3.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations