Designing a professional development program for mathematics teachers for effective use of technology in teaching

  • Seyum Tekeher GetenetEmail author


The present study demonstrated the importance and procedures of learners and learning context analysis to design a context-driven professional development program to effectively use of technology in mathematics classrooms. The study was conducted at departments of mathematics in two Colleges of Teacher Education using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. The data were collected from 16 mathematics teacher educators through a questionnaire, interviews, classroom observations and focus group discussions. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics of quantitative data and theme grouping of the qualitative data. The study showed that analyses of the learning context and teacher educators’ context were essential to design a context-driven professional development program containing relevant examples, contents, and scenarios for teachers. The findings of this study can provide a more practical approach and a model that could be adopted for studies aimed at designing a context-driven professional development program and influencing practices.


Context analysis Mathematics teacher educators Professional development Teacher education Technology in teaching 



  1. Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2011). Determining teachers’ TPACK through observations and self-report data. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011, Nashville, TN, USA.
  2. Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2007). Teaching in context: Some implications for elearning design. In R. J. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. K. A. Soong, & C. Cheers (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 61–70). Singapore: Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
  3. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. Scholar
  4. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 435–455. Scholar
  5. Conklin, N. L., Hook, L. L., Kelbaugh, B. J., & Nieto, R. D. (2002). Examining a professional development system: A comprehensive needs assessment approach. Journal of Extension, 40(5), 1–9 Retrieved from Scholar
  6. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. Scholar
  7. Getenet, S. T., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2016). Professionalizing in- service teachers’ focus on technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 19-34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Getenet, S. T. (2017). Adapting technological pedagogical content knowledge framework to teach mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2629-2644. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta, K. (2007). A practical guide to needs assessment (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer/Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 1–8 Scholar
  11. Hassler, B., Hennessy, S., Cross, A., Chileshe, E., & Machiko, B. (2015). School-based professional development in a developing context: Lessons learned from a case study in Zambia. Professional Development in Education, 41(5), 806–825. Scholar
  12. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. Scholar
  13. Kabakci, I., Ferhan Odabasi, H., & Kilicer, K. (2010). Transformative learning-based mentoring for professional development of teacher educators in information and communication technologies: An approach for an emerging country. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 263–273. Scholar
  14. Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). Training with ICT for ICT from the trainee’s perspective: A local ICT teacher training experience. Education and Information Technologies, 15(1), 3–17. Scholar
  15. Karagiorgi, Y., & Nicolaidou, M. (2013). Professional development of teacher educators: Voices from the Greek-Cypriot context. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 784–798. Scholar
  16. Keong, C., Horani, S., & Daniel, J. (2005). A study on the use of ICT in mathematics teaching. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(3), 43–51 Scholar
  17. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70 Retrieved from Scholar
  18. Kraemer, K. L., Dedrick, J., & Sharma, P. (2011). One laptop per child (OLPC): A novel computerization movement? In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on System Sciences-2011, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Adoption of ICT in science education: A case study of communication channels in a teachers’ professional development project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 103–118. Scholar
  20. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. Scholar
  21. Lee, H. (2007). Developing an effective professional development model to enhance teachers’ conceptual understanding and pedagogical strategies in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 125–144 Scholar
  22. Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In E. Jan & L. Jan (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 138–169). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Masuda, A. M., Ebersole, M. M., & Barrett, D. (2013). A qualitative inquiry: Teachers’ attitudes and willingness to engage in professional development at different career stages. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79(2), 6–14 Scholar
  24. McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., Eberhardt, J., Koehler, M. J., & Lundeberg, M. A. (2013). Virtual professional learning communities: Teachers’ perceptions of virtual versus face-to-face professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 267–277. Scholar
  25. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2012). Education statistics annual abstract. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054 Retrieved from Scholar
  27. Morrison, G. R. E. D., Kemp, J. E., & Ross, S. M. (2004). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. Scholar
  29. Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 83–95 Retrieved from Scholar
  30. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. Scholar
  31. Sangani, H. R., & Stelma, J. (2012). Reflective practice in developing world contexts: A general review of literature and a specific consideration of an Iranian experience. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 113–129. Scholar
  32. Schibeci, R., MacCallum, J., Cumming-Potvin, W., Durrant, C., Kissane, B., & Miller, E. J. (2008). Teachers’ journeys towards critical use of ICT. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 313–327. Scholar
  33. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. Scholar
  34. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Scholar
  35. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413–424. Scholar
  37. Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85–115. Scholar
  38. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. Scholar
  40. Wermke, W. (2011). Continuing professional development in context: Teachers’ continuing professional development culture in Germany and Sweden. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 665–683. Scholar
  41. Yusuf, M. O. (2005). Information and communication technology and education: Analysing the Nigerian national policy for information technology. International Education Journal, 6(3), 316–321 Retrieved from Scholar
  42. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5–32. Scholar
  43. Zein, M. S. (2016). Professional development needs of primary EFL teachers: Perspectives of teachers and teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 1–21. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of Southern QueenslandSpringfield CentralAustralia

Personalised recommendations