Teenagers connected to digital environments – what happens when they get to school? Commonalities, similarities and differences from their perspective
- 21 Downloads
In light of the many major changes in teenagers’ lives of due to digital applications and the significant role they play in their lives, and since school is a place where they spend many hours, this study examined their perspective of how the digital environment is integrated into their school life. Participating in this mixed-method study were 233 Israeli teenagers who completed a questionnaire and of whom 45 were interviewed. Findings show that what they have in common is extensive use of their smartphones and computers for study-related matters, they use many apps and social networks and belong to a variety of study-related groups. Similarities are that they have learned to need information and to obtain relevant information to solve problems or satisfy their curiosity. Differences lie in their comparison of the digital environments of their smartphone and home computer and those used in school, and to some participants the school environment seems outdated, slow, and scholastically and technologically unchallenging.
KeywordsInformation and communication technology (ICT) Digital literacy Equal opportunity Computer Smartphone Teenagers
Compliance with ethical standards
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The study received approval from the institutional review board (IRB) of Achva Academic College.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
- ACMA. (2007). Media and communication in Australian families. Sydney: ACMA Available at http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310893. Accessed Jan 2019.
- Alexander, A., & Hanson, J. (2003). Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in mass media and society. Guilford: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.Google Scholar
- Ashburn, E. A., & Floden, R. E. (2006). Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Atwal, K., Millwood Hargrave, A., Sancho, J., Agyeman, L., & Karet, N. (2003). What children watch: Analysis of children’s programming provisions between 1997–2001. London: BSC/ITC.Google Scholar
- Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators online, 7(1), 1–30 Retrieved from: http://www.thejeo.com/Archives/Volume7Number1/BakerPaper.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019.
- Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don 't trust anyone under 30). New York: Penguin Tarcher.Google Scholar
- Billings, D., & Halstead, J. (2009). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (3rd ed.). Saunders/Elsevier: St. Louis.Google Scholar
- Byron, T. (2008). Safer children in a digital world: The report of the Byron Review. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DCSF-00334-2008.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019.
- Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248–253 https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss1/13. Accessedn Jan 2019.
- Christensen, C., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disruptive class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Cole, J.E., & Kritzer J.B. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36-40. https://search.proquest.com/openview/a5278523c40042a6555aa670df1cecd0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=26876
- Coleman, A. M. (2001). Dictionary of psychology. Oxford Reference Online: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (2007). Media and the American child. San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Durish, P. (Ed.). (2013). Information technologe programs: Successes and challenges. Birmingham: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Engstrom, M., Santo, S., & Yost, R. (2008). Knowledge building in an online cohort. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 151–167.Google Scholar
- Fowles, J. (2003). Is television harmful for children? No. In A. Alexander & J. Hanson (Eds.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in mass media and society (pp. 47–53). McGraw-Hill/Dushkin: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Gatfield, L., & Millwood-Hargrave, A. (2003). Dramatic Licence – Fact or fiction? London: Broadcasting Standards Commission.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, J., & Sankey, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A sphere of influence enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. Paper presented at Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference 2008. Retrieved from http://eprints.suq.edu.au/42681/Lawrence_Sankey_ANZCA2008.pdf.
- Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. (2007). Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perceptions of building learning communities in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. ZER: Journal of Communication Studies, 18, 13–28.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Görzig, A. (Eds.). (2012). Children, risk and safety on the Internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective. Bristol: Marston Books, Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children's online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU children Online and Net Children Go Mobile. LSE, London: EU Children Online.Google Scholar
- Matareese, A. (2011). Online learning: Experts say digital literacy is about thinking — not gadgets. Medill News Service, April 30th.Google Scholar
- McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ofcom - Office of Communications (2010). UK adults' media literacy report. Retrieved 17 May from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/adults-media-literacy.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019.
- Pelz, B. (2004). Three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(3), 33–46.Google Scholar
- Salman, E. (2006). Taxonomy of collaborative e-learning. Cincinnati: Union Institute & University.Google Scholar
- Salyers, V., Carter, L., Carter, A., Myers, S., & Barrett, P. (2014). The search for meaningful e-learning at Canadian universities: A multi-institutional research study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning – IRRODL, 15(6).Google Scholar
- Sharan, Y. (2014). Learning to cooperate for cooperative learning. Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 802–807.Google Scholar
- Snyder, M. M. (2009). Instructional-design theory to guide the creation of online learning communities for adults. TechTrends, 53(1), 48–56.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..Google Scholar
- Taylor, P., & Kitter, S. (Eds.). (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Retrieved from http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf. Accessed Jan 2019.
- Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. Van der veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Young, S., & Bruce, M. A. (2011). Classroom community and student engagement in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(2) http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/young_0611.htm.
- Zilka, C.G. (2014). Empowering educators & mentors in the social media age – the three element way. Butan-Galim. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
- Zilka, C. G. (2016b). Do online friendships contribute to the social development of children and teenagers? The bright side of the picture. International journal of Humanities and Social Science (IJHSS), 6(7).Google Scholar
- Zilka, C. G. (2017a). Awareness of eSafety and potential online dangers amongst children and teenagers. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 319–338 https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3864. Accessed Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zilka, C. G. (2017b). Awareness of ICT capabilities, digital literacy, and use of reflective processes in children who received their first home computer. Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 80–98 http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijtel. Accessed Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zilka, C.G. (2018). Аlways with them: Smartphone use by children, adolescents, and young adults – Characteristics, habits of use, sharing, and satisfaction of needs. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-11. (UAIS). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0635-3.
- Zilka, C. G. (2019). The use of Mobile technologies by immigrant adolescents in coping with the new language and with their formal studies. In A. Forkosh-Baruch & H. Meishar-Tal (Eds.), Mobile technologies in educational organizations (Chapter 10 pp. 192–210).https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/the-use-of-mobile-technologies-by-immigrant-adolescents-in-coping-with-the-new-language-and-with-their-formal-studies/227229 https://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=227229&ptid=214497&t=The%20Use%20of%20Mobile%20Technologies%20by%20Immigrant%20Adolescents%20in%20Coping%20With%20the%20New%20Language%20and%20With%20Their%20Formal%20Studies&isxn=9781522581062