Advertisement

The effect of the serious game Tempoly on learning arithmetic polynomial operations

  • Cândida BarrosEmail author
  • Ana Amélia Carvalho
  • António Salgueiro
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Research on learning through serious games has been gaining importance in recent years. We develop the serious game Tempoly, concerning the learning of the four arithmetic operations on polynomials. A quasi-experimental study was carried out with 95 students of 8th grade, to evaluate the reactions of the students to the game, the effects of the use of the game in the students’ learning, and the use of the game through time. According to data collected through a questionnaire, we may conclude that students liked to play the game, considered that the game helped them learning the polynomial operations and that what they learned in class was useful to play the game. It was concluded that students who played the game simultaneously with the classes improved their results in a pre/post-test more than the students who did not play the game and through a Mann-Whitney test, the results showed statistical differences. The study revealed that the students that had more time to play the game did play more out of the class.

Keywords

Serious games Tempoly Mathematics education Learning 

Notes

Funding

This work is partially funded by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Programme and by National Funds through FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the project number PTDC/CPE-CED/118337/2010.

References

  1. Aliefenedic, J. (2013). The correlation between the time spent playing video games and students’ performance on standardized mathematics tests by fifth-grade students. Phd. Thesis, Texas A&M University-Commerce.Google Scholar
  2. Bai, H., Pan, W., Hirumi, A., & Kebritchi, M. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-D instructional game on improving mathematics achievement and motivation of middle school students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 993–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beserra, V., Nussbaum, M., & Oteo, M. (2018). On-task and off-task behavior in the classroom: a study on mathematics learning with educational video games. Journal of Educational Computing Research in print.Google Scholar
  4. Booth, L. (1984). Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors, a report of the strategies and errors in the secondary school project. London: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, M., Evans, M. A., Kim, S., Norton, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Samur, Y. (2016). The effects of an educational video game on mathematical engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1283–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiang, F.-k., & Qin, L. (2018). A pilot study to assess the impacts of game-based construction learning, using scratch, on students’ multi-step equation-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments in print.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D. B., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Paper commissioned for the National Research Council workshop on gaming and simulations (pp. 1–71). Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  8. Common Sense (2015). The Common Sense Census: Media Use By Tweens and Teens. Common Sense.Google Scholar
  9. Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., & Hainey, T. (2009). Towards the development of a games-based learning evaluation framework. In T. Connolly, M. Stansfield, & L. Boyle (Eds.), Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices (pp. 251–273). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  11. Corder, G., & Foreman, D. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  13. Ennemoser, M. (2009). Evaluating the potential of serious games: What can we learn from previous research on media effects and educational intervention? In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.). Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 344–373). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The Design of Games-Based Learning Environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guzmán, M. (1990). The role of games and puzzles in the popularization of mathematics. L'Enseignement Mathématique, 36, 359–368.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51, 1609–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klopfer, E. (2016). Resonant Games - Designing educational games that resonate in the lives of students, teachers and schools. In A. A. Carvalho, S. Cruz, C. G. Marques, A. Moura, I. Santos, & N. Zagalo (Orgs.), Proceedings of the 3rd EJML (pp. 313–320). Coimbra: FPCE, University of Coimbra.Google Scholar
  20. Kyriakides, A., Meletiou-Mavrotheri, M., & Prodromou, T. (2016). Mobile technologies in the service of students’ learning of mathematics: The example of game application a.L.E.X. in the context of a primary school in Cyprus. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manginas, G., & Nikolantonakis, C. (2018). The contribution of mathematics online games to qualitative differentiation and intrinsic motivation f students with mild intellectual disabilities. European Journal of Special Education Research, 3(1), 58–81.Google Scholar
  22. McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games. Cambridge: Teem.Google Scholar
  23. Mozelius, P. (2014). Game based learning – A way to stimulate intrinsic motivation. In T. Yanez, P. Griffiths, & O. Rodriguez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on e-learning (pp. 272–278). Valparaiso: Academic Conferences Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  25. Parsons, D., & Adhikari, J. (2016). Bring your own device to secondary school: The perceptions of teachers, students and parents. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 66–80.Google Scholar
  26. Poll, H. (2015). Pearson student Mobile device survey 2015. National Report: Students in Grades 4–12. Pearson.Google Scholar
  27. Pope, H., & Mangram, C. (2015). Wuzzit trouble: The influence of a digital math game on student number Sense. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Jaakkola, T., Pongsakdi, N., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Brezovszky, B., & Lehtinen, E. (2018). The development of situational interest during a digital mathematics game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning in print.Google Scholar
  30. Sharek, D., & Wiebe, E. (2011). Using flow theory to design video games as experimental stimuli. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 55th annual meeting (pp. 1520–1524). Las Vegas: SAGE.Google Scholar
  31. Shin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2006). Effects of handheld games on students learning in mathematics. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), ICLS '06 proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 702–708). Bloomington: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  32. Shute, V., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth assessment. Measuring and supporting learning in video games. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siew, N., Geofrey, J., & Lee, B. (2016). Students’ algebraic thinking and attitudes towards algebra: The effects of game-based learning using Dragonbox 12 + app. The Research Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 5(1), 66–79.Google Scholar
  34. Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning - teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  35. Squire, K. (2013). Video game based learning: An emerging paradigm for instruction. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(1), 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sternig, C., Spitzer, M., & Ebner, M. (2018). Learning in a virtual environment: Implementation and evaluation of a VR math-game. In Information resources management association (Ed.), Virtual and augmented reality: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1288–1312). Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  37. Ulicsak, M., & Williamson, B. (2010). Computer games and learning: A handbook. London: Futurelab.Google Scholar
  38. van der Ven, F., Segers, E., Takashima, A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Effects of a tablet game intervention on simple addition and subtraction fluency in first graders. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 200–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cândida Barros
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Amélia Carvalho
    • 1
  • António Salgueiro
    • 2
  1. 1.LabTE, Faculty of Psychology and Education SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations