Predicting educators’ use of Twitter for professional learning and development
- 19 Downloads
This paper proposes and tests a conceptual model of educators’ Twitter adoption for professional learning and development based on technology adoption model and related literature. To understand the factors that may affect educators’ adoption of Twitter for professional learning and development, a questionnaire was designed and administered to 305 participants with the majority (88.5%) being 31 or older, and a structural equation model was constructed to examine the relationships among the factors that affect this adoption process. The results suggest that the research framework integrating multiple perspectives provides a comprehensive understanding of educators’ intention and actual use of Twitter for professional learning and development. Specifically, educators’ attitude of adoption and the purpose of Twitter usage had a significant direct effect on educators’ intention and actual use of Twitter for professional learning and development. The study suggests, to encourage educators to adopt Twitter for professional learning and development, we need to help them understand the usefulness of Twitter, whether its usage fits with their learning tasks, as well as for what purposes they are going to use it.
KeywordsProfessional development Social media Technology adoption Structural equation model Lifelong learning
Compliance with ethical standards
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This research involves human participants.
Informed consent was obtained from all who participated in the study. A consent form was signed electronically by the subjects before the data was collected to make the subjects eligible for participation. The data collected are kept confidential. The data do not identify the subjects from which it was collected, other than to the two investigators. Electronic data are stored in password protected files on a secure computer accessible only by the investigators.
- Bledsoe, T. S., Harmeyer, D., & Wu, S. F. (2014). Utilizing Twitter and #hashtags toward enhancing student learning in an online course environment. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 12(3), 75–83.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2016). Participatory learning through social media: How and why social studies educators use Twitter. Contemporary Issues In Technology & Teacher Education, 16(1), 38–59.Google Scholar
- Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J.-H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x.Google Scholar
- Chu, T.-H., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2016). With good we become good: Understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92(Supplement C), 37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.Google Scholar
- Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Horton hears a tweet. The EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4).Google Scholar
- Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: a structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192–199.Google Scholar
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.Google Scholar
- Gao, F. & Li, L. (2017). Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology. 48(2), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12384.
- Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.Google Scholar
- Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Hennessy, C. M., Kirkpatrick, E., Smith, C. F., & Border, S. (2016). Social media and anatomy education: Using twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy: Use of Twitter in anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(6), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1610.Google Scholar
- Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2016). Education scholars’ evolving uses of Twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 445–464.Google Scholar
- Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Participatory learning through social media: How and why social studies educators use Twitter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 38–59.Google Scholar
- Noble, A., McQuillan, P., & Littenberg-Tobias, J. (2016). "A lifelong classroom": Social studies educators' engagement with professional learning networks on Twitter. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 187–213.Google Scholar
- Roberts, M. J., Perera, M., Lawrentschuk, N., Romanic, D., Papa, N., & Bolton, D. (2015). Globalization of continuing professional development by journal clubs via microblogging: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(4), e103–e103. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4194.Google Scholar
- Rodesiler, L., & Pace, B. G. (2015). English teachers' online participation as professional development: A narrative study. English Education, 47(4), 347.Google Scholar
- Shang, R. A., Chen, Y. C., & Chen, C. M. (2007). Why people blog? An empirical investigations of the task technology fit model. PACIS 2007 Proceedings, 212–225.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.Google Scholar