Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 1337–1350 | Cite as

Flipping a college mathematics classroom: An action research project

  • Raoul AmstelveenEmail author


In this action research study, a flipped and non-flipped college-level mathematics classroom were compared. Participants in the flipped classroom watched video lessons outside of class and engaged in classwork problems during class. The non-flipped classroom consisted of a lecture then assigned classwork problems during class. Descriptive statistics revealed that learners preferred a flipped classroom to a non-flipped classroom and that the video lectures helped them learn the course material. A one-way ANCOVA on posttest showed no difference between learners in the flipped classroom and non-flipped classroom with pre-test scores as a covariate. Although independent samples t-test did not reveal statistically significant differences on several in-class examinations between the two groups, small positive effects showed in the flipped classroom students’ performance. Course evaluation of the two groups showed a small to large-size effect on five items, pertaining to this study. Learners in the flipped classroom perceived that the video lectures helped them to learn more mathematics compared to learners in the non-flipped classroom who did not use video lectures (p = .039).


Flipped learning Flipped classroom Course evaluation College algebra College mathematics 



  1. Barkley, A. (2015). Flipping the college classroom for enhanced student learning. NACTA Journal, 59(3), 240–244.Google Scholar
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, J., & Verlegen, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Atlanta: Proceedings of the 120 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition paper ID #6219.Google Scholar
  4. Cargile, L., & Harkness, S. (2015). Flip or flop: Are math teachers using khan academy as environed by Sal khan? Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 59(6), 21–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Arujo, Z., Otten, S., & Birisci, S. (2017). Conceptualizing "homework" in flipped mathematics classes. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 248–260.Google Scholar
  6. Frydenberg, M. (2012). Flipping excel. New Orleans: Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference.Google Scholar
  7. Fulton, K. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graziano, K. J., & Hall, J. D. (2017). Flipping math in a secondary classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 36(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  9. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled A review of flipped learning. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  10. Ichinose, C., & Clinkenbeard, J. (2016). Flipping college algebra: Effects on student engagement and achievement. Learning Assistance Review, 21(1), 115–129.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jungić, V., Kaur, H., Mulholland, J., & Xin, C. (2015). On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 508–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirvan, R., Rakes, C., & Zamora, R. (2015). Flipping an algebra classroom: Analyzing, modeling, and solving systems of linear equations. Computers in the Schools, 32(3–4), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGivney-Burelle, J., & Xue, F. (2013). Flipping calculus. Primus, 23(5), 477–486. Scholar
  15. Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152.Google Scholar
  16. Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16–20.Google Scholar
  17. Saunders, J. M. (2014). The flipped classroom: Its effect on student academic achievement and critical thinking skills in high school mathematics (UMI 3645482). Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 76(03), 128.Google Scholar
  18. Selingo, J. (2013). College (un)bound: The future of higher education and what it means for students. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  19. Shafique, M., & Irwin-Robinson, H. (2015). A study on the effectiveness of flipped teaching in college math classroom. International Journal of Education and Information Technology, 1(2), 29–33.Google Scholar
  20. Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 15(2), 171–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swart, W., & Wuensch, K. (2016). Flipping quantitative classes: A triple win. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(1), 67–89. Scholar
  22. Van Sickle, J. (2016). Discrepancies between student perception and achievement of learning outcomes in a flipped classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 29–29. Scholar
  23. Zack, L., Fuselier, J., Graham-Squire, A., Lamb, R., & O'Hara, K. (2015). Flipping freshman mathematics. Primus, 25(9–10), 803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Arts & SciencesJohnson & Wales UniversityNorth MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations