Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 1035–1055 | Cite as

Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and direct learning environment on sophomores’ academic achievement in electronic and computer fundamentals

  • Jimoh Bakare
  • Chibueze Tobias OrjiEmail author
Article
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Some of the factors that influence students’ academic achievement, and retention of learning include teacher’s mode of teaching, his/her experiences and personality, workload, ability to make use of the available resource materials for teaching and learning. However, literature and some researchers have made it known that adopting students’ driven teaching approach like reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) has a strong and positive impact on students’ achievement. The study aimed at determining the effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and direct learning environment on sophomores’ academic achievement in electronic and computer fundamentals in Nigeria. The study adopted a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent groups of intact classes. The participants for the study were 107 s year Degree students made up of 76 males and 31 females drawn from the two public universities in the State. The instruments used for data collection were Electronic and Computer Fundamentals Achievement Test (ECFAT) and Electronic and Computer Fundamentals Interest Inventory (ECFII). The internal consistency of the ECFII was also determined using the Cronbach alpha reliability method. The test scores generated from the pre-test and post-test using ECFAT was analyzed using Mean and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to test the three null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. It was found that Reciprocal Peer Tutoring (RPT) is more effective than the direct learning in improving sophomores’ achievement in electronic and computer fundamentals. There was a significant effect of gender on students’ achievement, interest and retention of learning in electronic and computer fundamentals. Students learn faster and master skills better when they are allowed to participate actively in the class by interacting freely with the lecturers and their peers, work in groups and perform practical projects together. The adoption of the reciprocal peer tutoring generally improves the academic achievement of students in electronic and computer fundamentals.

Keywords

Reciprocal peer tutoring Direct instruction environment Achievement Interest and retention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The researchers are grateful to the Management of the University of Lagos and Yaba College of Technology for allowing their students to partake in this study. The researchers also appreciate the lecturers and students of technical/vocational education in the two institutions who agreed to be part of the study.

Authors’ contributions

Bakare and Orji conceived the idea that gave rise to the title, wrote the introduction and collected data for the study.

Bakare wrote the methodology.

Orji carried out the data analysis and discussion and still corresponding for the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

I confirm that I have read Springer Open’s guidance on competing interests and have included a statement indicating that none of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

References

  1. Access Center (2017). Using Peer Tutoring to Facilitate Access. http://www.readingrockets.org/article/using-peer-tutoring-facilitate-access
  2. Adio, T.A. (2016). Effect of web-based instructional package on academic achievement of general metalwork students in science and technical colleges in federal colleges in federal capital territory, Nigeria. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  3. Aina, O. (2000). Nigeria technical and vocational education in the near future. In Federal Ministry of Education (2001), The national master plan for technical and vocational development in Nigeria in the 21st century with the blue print for the decade 2010. Abuja FME.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Faki, I. M., & Khamis, A. H. A. (2014). Difficulties facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in their classes. American International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 136–158.Google Scholar
  5. Ali, A. (2006). Conducting research in education and the social sciences. Enugu: Tashiwa Netwoness Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Anaele, E. (2005). Electronic skills needed by technical college students for self – Employment. Journal of Vocational and Adult Education, 4, 27–35.Google Scholar
  7. Anene, M. (2005). Measurement and assessment in education. Lagos: Bolabay Publication.Google Scholar
  8. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). New York: Thompson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  9. Bakare, J. (2009). Effect of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement of electrical/electronic technology students in technical colleges in Ekiti state. University of Nigeria: Unpublished M.ed thesis.Google Scholar
  10. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2006). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 54(2), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell and Campbell (1999). Multiple intelligence and students achievement; success, stories from six schools. Retrieved on July 15th, 2008 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/199274.aspx.
  12. Chukwu, A. (2002). Promoting students’ interest in mathematics using local games. International journal of art and technology education, 2(1), 54–56.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, E. G. (1997). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. In E. Dubinsky, D. Mathews, & B. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Readings in cooperative learning for undergraduate mathematics (pp. 135–156). Washington: Mathematics Association of America.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of peer tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. College Board (2008). Electronic Technology. Retrieved August 7, 2008, from www.collegeboard.com
  16. Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. C. (1985). Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education, 19, 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dagoli, A. T. (1999). Effect of guided inquiry teaching method on students’ achievement in geometry. University of Nigeria: Unpublished M.Ed project.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Education, United State of America. (2004). Ideas that work. Retrieved on September 20, 2018 from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/index.html.
  19. Department of Vocational Teacher Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. (2015). Student’s Handbook. Nsukka: Ndudim Press.Google Scholar
  20. Egbochuku E.O., & Obiunu, J.J. (2006). The effects of reciprocal peer counselling in the enhancement of self-concept among adolescents. Education Project Innovation Inc., 126 (3).Google Scholar
  21. Ekpo, J. (2006). Tips on teaching difficult concepts in senior secondary school chemistry. Review of Education, 17(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Emmanuel, A.S. (2015). Performance of students in electronic and computer fundamentals: A great concern of TVET Educators in Nigeria. A paper presented at the annual national conference of Nigerian vocational association held at Yaba College of Technology, Yaba Lagos State Nigeria.Google Scholar
  23. Englert, C. S. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esteve, B. M. (2005). Reciprocal peer tutoring and treatment integrity of elementary school students. An M. A Thesis, Louisiana State University. Retrieved June 10, 2007, From http://etd.isu.edu/docs/available/etd-11142005-151539/unrestricted/Estevethesispdf.
  25. Ezeudu, S. A., & Ezeh, O. (2008). Effect of the use of scale models on academic achievement of students in map work. In B. G. Nworgu (Ed.), Educational reforms and the attainment of the millennium development goals (MDGs): The Nigeria experience (pp. 179–183). Nsukka: University Trust Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Fantuzzo, J. W., Dimeff, L. A., & Fox, S. L. (1989). Reciprocal peer tutoring: A multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students. Teaching of Psychology Journal, 16, 133–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fantuzzo, JW, & Rohrbeck, CA (1992). Self-management approaches into classroom systems. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 255–263.Google Scholar
  28. Federal Ministry of Education. (2010). Technical and vocational education development in Nigeria in the 21 st century with the blue-print for the decade 2001–2010. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  29. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for sustaining research-based practice in the schools: A case study. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1–44.Google Scholar
  30. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies for high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gazulaa, S., McKennab, L., Cooperd, S. & Paliadelic, P. (2016). A systematic review of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring within tertiary health profession educational programs. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301116300712 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.12.001).
  32. Great Schools Partnership, (2013). Direct Instruction. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/direct-instruction/. July 4, 2017.
  33. Griffin, B. W., & Griffin, M. M. (1997). The effect of reciprocal peer tutoring on graduate students’ achievement, test anxiety, and academic self – Efficacy. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harbor-Peters, V. F. A. (2002). Generating and sustaining interest in mathematics classroom. In A. O. E. Anmalu & V. F. A. Harbor-Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop for re-training mathematics teachers at the University of Nigeria Secondary School (9th – 11th December). Enugu: Snaap Press.Google Scholar
  35. Henson, L. D., Hagos, L. C., & Villapando, R. A. (2009). The effectiveness of reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT) on the academic performance of students in mathematics. INTI Journal: Special Issue on Teaching and Learning, 94–103.Google Scholar
  36. Hsiao-Chen H (2003). A research on career self-concept and its relevant factors of high school students from single-parent families.Google Scholar
  37. Jarvis, P. (1998). The practitioner researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, D. W., Marujama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Kim, T., & Axelrod, S. (2005). Direct instruction: An educators’ guide and a Plea for action. The Behavior Analyst Today, 6(2), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. (2007). Different patterns of student-faculty interaction in research universities: An analysis by student gender, race, SES, and first-generation status. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  42. Kourea, L., Cartledge, G., & Musti-Rao, S. (2007). Improving the reading skills of urban elementary students through total class peer tutoring. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 95–107.Google Scholar
  43. Kurumeh, M. S. C. (2004). Effects of ethnomathematics approach on students’ achievement and interest in geometry and mensuration. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  44. Ladyshewsky R. (2001). Reciprocal peer coaching: A strategy for training and development in professional discipline. Jamison, ACT, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia Inc. Google Scholar
  45. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison -Wesley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Maheady, L. (2001). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions and students with mild disabilities. Journal of Remedial and Special Education, 22, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. Sam Francisco: Jossey – bass publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Mickelson, W. T., Yetter, G., Lemberger, M., Hovater, S., & Ayers, R. (2003). Reciprocal peer tutoring: An embedded assessment technique to improve students’ learning and achievement. Chicago: American Education Research Association.Google Scholar
  49. National Population Commission. (1991). Census Report. Abuja: NPC.Google Scholar
  50. Nazzal, A. (2002). Peer-tutoring and at-risk students: An exploratory study. Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nekang, F. N. (2004). Effect of concept mapping on students achievement and interest in elementary probability in basic division of Cameroon. Unpublished M.Ed project University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  52. Newsweek Magazine Report. (2008). Interactive whiteboards enhance classroom instruction and learning. Accessed September 6, 2016, from https://m.neamb.com/professional-resources/benefits-of interactive-whiteboards.htm.
  53. Obiunu, J. J. (2008). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on the enhancement of career decision making process among secondary school adolescents. Educational Research and Review, 3(7), 236–241.Google Scholar
  54. Oczkus, L. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Nemark, D. E: International Reading Association. Retrieved April 29 from http://project.coe.uga.edu/epttt/index.php?title.ReciprocalTeaching .
  55. Odikwe, J. S. (2002). Gender difference in solving chemical problems among Nigerian students. Research in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 77–85.Google Scholar
  56. Ogwo, B. A., & Oranu, R. N. (2006). Methodology in formal and non – Formal technical / vocational education. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ojo, A. (2014). Analysis of students’ performance in core vocational/technical education courses in selected universities in south West Nigeria. A paper presented at the annual national conference of Nigerian vocational association held at University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  58. Okebukola, P.A. (1996). Learning with concepts and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Retrieved from http://pok.sagebpub.com/cgi/contentl76/4/414.
  59. Okoro, O. M. (2002). Measurement and evaluation in education. Anambra: Pacific Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  60. Olelewe, C. J., & Agomuo, E. E. (2016). Effects of B-learning and F2F learning environments on students’ achievement in QBASIC programming. Computer & Education, 103, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olorundare, S. (2007). Utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) in curriculum development implementation and evaluation. In D. N. Eze & N. Onyegegbu (Eds.), Information communication technology in the service of education (pp. 11–33). Enugu: TIMEX.Google Scholar
  62. Oluikpe, E. N. (2004). Effects of English for academic purpose (EAP) method for the achievement of University of Nigeria education students in expository writing. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  63. Orji, T. C., & Ogbuanya, T. C. (2018). Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based and lecture-based learning environments on students’ achievements in electronic works. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 0(0), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720918773983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ozoagu, F. O. (2007). Effect of recorded videotape instructional strategy on the academic achievement of electrical technology students of Enugu state technical colleges. M.ed thesis, Department of Vocational Teacher Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  65. Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 508e520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Poisson, C. (2000). Educational Theory. Retrieved on October 11, 2008, from http://www.bgu.ac.II/af/aloc/leartyheor:HTML.
  67. Rebar, M. (2007). Academic acceleration in first grade using the Direct Instruction model. Cheney: Eastern Washington University.Google Scholar
  68. Rittschof, K. A., & Griffin, B. W. (2001). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Re-examining the value of a co-operative learning technique to college students and instructors. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self – Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well – Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ryder, R. J., Burton, J. L., & Silberg, A. (2006). A longitudinal study of direct instruction effects from first through third grade. Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2008). Classroom-based use of two educational technologies: A sociocultural perspective. Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 394–406 Available from: http://www.citejournal.org/articles/v8i4currentpractice2.pdf.Google Scholar
  72. Sekaran, S. (2003). Measurement: Scaling, reliability, validity. In In research methods for business: A skill building approach. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  74. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning in post-secondary education: Implications from social psychology for active learning experiences. A Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.Google Scholar
  75. Sonola, O. (2007). Current teaching methods discourage Creativity. The Punch (7 December): 36.Google Scholar
  76. Sraha, E.C. (2016). Applied electricity and electronic. Ghana: pedaddo ventures.Google Scholar
  77. Stanford, P. (2003). Multiple intelligence for every classroom. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(2), 80e85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Suha, A.M.A. (2003). Reciprocal peer tutoring effect on high-frequency sight word learning, retention, and generalization of first- and second grade urban elementary school students. A PhD Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the Ohio State University, United States of America.Google Scholar
  79. Theraja, B. L., & Theraja, A. K. (2010). Electrical technology. New Delhi: S. Chand and Company Limited.Google Scholar
  80. Theraja, B. L., & Theraja, A. K. (2013). Electrical technology. New Delhi: S. Chand and Company Limited.Google Scholar
  81. Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Umoh, U. C. (2001). Effect of Games on the achievement and interest of junior secondary school students in Igbo-grammar. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
  83. Umunadi, K. E. (2009). A relational study of students’ academic achievement of television technology in technical colleges in Delta State of Nigeria. Retrieved January 1, 2017, from http://www.scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v46n3/umunadi.html
  84. UNESCO and ILO. (2002). Technical and vocational education and training for twenty 1st century recommendations. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  85. US Department of Education (2003-2017). What is direct instruction? Retrieved from http://study.com/academy/lesson/direct-instruction-teaching-method-definition-examples-strategies.html.
  86. Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods, methodological brief, impact evaluation 8. Florence: Unicef office of research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Technical Education, Faculty of Vocational and Technical EducationUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations