The online learning process and scaffolding in student teachers’ personal learning environments
Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) enable lifelong learning and make competences visible in education and professional life. This paper illuminates how to design an online learning process that enables deep learning through PLEs based upon our study of a scaffolding process supported by Web 2.0 tools. Professional student teachers developed their own blogs as PLEs, and we collected data from five student teacher groups. We employed the DIANA pedagogical model to design a dialogical, collaborative, and authentic learning process before comparing its activities against the activities of the five-stage model for scaffolding designed for online learning processes. The results indicate that the DIANA model includes the elements of the five-stage model, and it appears that teacher scaffolding is particularly important in student PLEs. These findings provide insights to other practitioners seeking to design and implement online learning processes that are based on collaborative knowledge construction utilizing students’ Personal Learning Environments.
KeywordsOnline learning Personal learning environment Scaffolding Pedagogy Web 2.0 tools
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aarnio, H. (2006). Oppijalähtöisyyttä ja yhteisöllisyyttä tietoverkkoja ja verkostoja hyödyntävään oppimiseen – Tutkimustuloksia DIANA-klinikalta [Enhancing learner-centredness and collaboration in learning online and in networks – results from DIANA clinic]. Saarijärvi: Saarijärven Offset Oy.Google Scholar
- Aarnio, H., & Enqvist, J. (2004). Kohti tiedon yhdessä luomista verkossa: DIANA-projekti [towards collaborative knowledge creation online: DIANA-project 2002–2003]. Saarijärvi: Saarijärven Offset Oy.Google Scholar
- Aarnio, H., & Enqvist, J. (2016). DIANA-mallistako kehys digiajan oppimiselle [DIANA model – A framework for learning in the digital age]. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 18(3).Google Scholar
- Abram, S. (2007). Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and Librarian 2.0: Preparing for the 2.0 World. In S. Ricketts & C. Birdie & E. Isaksson (Eds.), Library and Information Services in Astronomy V: Common Challenges, Uncommon Solutions (pp. 161–166). Massachusetts: ASP Conference Series.Google Scholar
- Agostinho, S., Bennet, S., Lockyer, L., Jones, J., & Harper, B. (2013). Learning Designs as a Stimulus and Support for Teachers’ Design Practices. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age (pp. 119–132). New York: Roudledge.Google Scholar
- Aramo-Immonen, H., Ammirato, S. & Jussila, J. (2016). Blogging as a virtual co-learning environment in international course context in L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.). Barcelona: 8 th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Edulearn16 conference, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments – The future of learning?, eLearning Papers 2(1). http://www.informelleslernen.de/fileadmin/dateien/Informelles_Lernen/Buecher_Dokumente/Attwell_2007-ple.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2017.
- Bassani, P., & Barbosa, D. (2018). Experiences with web 2.0 in school settings: A framework to foster educational practices based on a personal learning environment perspective. Educacao em Revista, 34. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698162010.
- Beetham, H. (2013). Designing for learning in an uncertain future. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 258–281). New York: Roudledge.Google Scholar
- Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1992). . Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Disessa, A., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. American Educational Research Assosiation, 32(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
- Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–56). Norwood: Albex.Google Scholar
- Fiedler, S. (2013). Emancipating and Developing Learning Activity: Systemic Intervention and Re-Instrumentation in Higher Education. Doctoral dissertation. University of Turku. Centre of learning research. http://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/77017. Accessed 12 March 2017.
- Fiedler, S. & Väljataga, T. (2013). Personal learning environments: a conceptual landscape revisited. eLearning Papers 35. https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/sites/default/files/legacy_files/asset/In-depth_35_2_1.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2017.
- Fishman, B., Penuel, W., Allen, A.-R., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging mode for transforming the relationship of research and practice. In J. Fishman, B. Penuel, A.-R. Allen, & B. Cheng (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods and exemplars (pp. 136–156). New York: National Society for Study of Education.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marsick, V., Watkins, K., Callahan, M. & Volpe, M. (2006). Reviewing theory and research on informal and incidental learning. Retrieved from ERIC on 2017-11-29 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492754.pdf
- Mayes, t., & de Freitas, S. (2013). Review of learning theories, frameworks and models. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.Google Scholar
- Özkan, B. & McKenzie, B. (2008). Social Networking Tools for Teacher Education. In: K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 2772–2776). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Rahimi, E., van den Berg, J. & Veen, W. (2012). Designing and Implementing PLEs in a Secondary School Using Web 2.0 Tools. In The Personal Learning Envrionment (PLE) Conference Melbourne 2012.Google Scholar
- Ruhalahti, S., Korhonen, A.-M., & Ruokamo, H. (2016). The dialogical authentic Netlearning activity (DIANA) model for collaborative knowledge construction in mOOC. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(2), 58–67 http://www.tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdel-volume04-i02.pdf. Accessed 12 March, 2017.Google Scholar
- Salmon, G. (2003). Emoderating the key to teaching & learning online. Oxon: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd..Google Scholar
- Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Teräs, H. (2016). Design principles of an authentic online professional development program for multicultural faculty. Academic dissertation. University of Tampere, School of Education. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
- van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wheeler, S. (2015). Learning with’e’s Educational theory and practice in the digital age. Llandysul: Gomer Press.Google Scholar