Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 591–611 | Cite as

An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-determination theory

  • Yu-Chih Huang
  • Sheila J. Backman
  • Kenneth F. Backman
  • Francis A. McGuire
  • DeWayne Moore
Article
  • 186 Downloads

Abstract

With the development and evaluation of information technology, virtual reality technology provides opportunities to offer an immersive and interactive experience for supplementing traditional classroom lecture and creating innovative online learning in education curricula and professional training. Given that the arena of 3D entertainment-oriented virtual worlds is creative and quickly evolving, applying a theory-based motivational model to examine the properties of virtual world environments in the context of education remains relatively unexplored territory. Thus, the present study applies the research frameworks of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and hedonic theory to an understanding of how 3D virtual reality technology contexts satisfy or obstruct psychological needs and thus foster or undermine sustained engagement, affecting behavioral intentions. This study extends existing literature in the field by showing that psychological needs and hedonic experience are important components in understanding virtual reality technology and human interaction. The findings are important in explaining the value of 3D virtual reality technology in educational applications that contribute to the overall enhancement of the learner’s motivation and learning experience.

Keywords

Virtual reality technology Self-determination theory Hedonic theory Intrinsic motivation Virtual experience 

Notes

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice - a review and recommended 2-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.Google Scholar
  3. Andreas, K., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T., & Pomportsis, A. (2010). Fostering collaborative learning in second life: Metaphors and affordances. Computers & Education, 55(2), 603–615.Google Scholar
  4. Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., & Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 789–810.Google Scholar
  5. Antoniou, P. E., Athanasopoulou, C. A., Dafli, E., & Bamidis, P. D. (2014). Exploring design requirements for repurposing dental virtual patients from the web to second life: A focus group study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6), e151.Google Scholar
  6. Arnould, E., & Price, L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 24–45.Google Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1998). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, S. C., Wentz, R. K., & Woods, M. M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59–64.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, S. J. (2011). Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model. Information Management, 48(8), 313–319.Google Scholar
  10. Barr, P., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2007). Video game values: Human–computer interaction and games. Interacting with Computers, 19(2), 180–195.Google Scholar
  11. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for windows: User's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  12. Berns, A., Gonzalez-Pardo, A., & Camacho, D. (2013). Game-like language learning in 3-D virtual environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 210–220.Google Scholar
  13. Boellstorff, T. (2015). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Boulos, M. N. K., Hetherington, L., & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233–245.Google Scholar
  16. Bower, M., Lee, M. J., & Dalgarno, B. (2017). Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 407–430.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Bruwer, J., & Alant, K. (2009). The hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: An experiential view. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21(3), 235–257.Google Scholar
  19. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.Google Scholar
  20. Cheng, G. (2014). Exploring students' learning styles in relation to their acceptance and attitudes towards using second life in education: A case study in Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 70, 105–115.Google Scholar
  21. Cheong, D. (2010). The effects of practice teaching sessions in second life on the change in pre-service teachers’ teaching efficacy. Computers & Education, 55(2), 868–880.Google Scholar
  22. Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T. M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136–1144.Google Scholar
  23. Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2005). Predicting health behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, C. P. (2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357–369.Google Scholar
  25. De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on second life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220–233.Google Scholar
  26. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182.Google Scholar
  28. Dholakia, U. M. (2006). How customer self-determination influences relational marketing outcomes: Evidence from longitudinal field studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 109–120.Google Scholar
  29. Dreher, C., Reiners, T., Dreher, N., & Dreher, H. (2009). Virtual worlds as a context suited for information systems education: Discussion of pedagogical experience and curriculum design with reference to second life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 211.Google Scholar
  30. Enders, C. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322–337.Google Scholar
  31. Faiola, A., & Smyslova, O. (2009). Flow experience in second life: The impact of telepresence on human-computer interaction. Online communities and social computing. Proceedings Third International Conference, OCSC 2009. Held as Part of HCI International 2009.Google Scholar
  32. Fang, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, S. S. (2013). Development of an instrument for studying flow in computer game play. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(7), 456–470.Google Scholar
  33. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error - algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.Google Scholar
  34. Fullagar, C. J., & Mills, M. J. (2008). Motivation and flow: Toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students. Journal of Psychology, 142(5), 533–556.Google Scholar
  35. Gabisch, J. A., & Gwebu, K. L. (2011). Impact of virtual brand experience on purchase intentions: The role of multichannel congruence. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 302–319.Google Scholar
  36. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organization Behavior, 26, 331–362.Google Scholar
  37. Gallego, M. D., Bueno, S., & Noyes, J. (2016). Second life adoption in education: A motivational model based on uses and gratifications theory. Computers & Education, 100, 81–93.Google Scholar
  38. Girvan, C., Tangney, B., & Savage, T. (2013). SLurtles: Supporting constructionist learning in second life. Computers & Education, 61, 115–132.Google Scholar
  39. Govers, R., Go, F. M., & Kumar, K. (2007). Virtual destination image: A new measurement approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4), 977–997.Google Scholar
  40. Green, J., Wyllie, A., & Jackson, D. (2014). Virtual worlds: A new frontier for nurse education? Collegian, 21(2), 135–141.Google Scholar
  41. Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2011). Purchase behavior in virtual worlds: An empirical investigation in second life. Information Management, 48(7), 303–312.Google Scholar
  42. Guttentag, D. A. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management, 31(5), 637–651.Google Scholar
  43. Hagger, M., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2008). Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 79–103.Google Scholar
  44. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.Google Scholar
  45. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010). Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 353–362.Google Scholar
  46. Hassenzahl, M., Wiklund-Engblom, A., Bengs, A., Hägglund, S., & Diefenbach, S. (2015). Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: Psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 530–544.Google Scholar
  47. Hirschman, M. B., & Holbrook, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.Google Scholar
  48. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2012). Toward a deeper understanding of social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 69–70.Google Scholar
  49. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.Google Scholar
  50. Holsapple, C. W., & Wu, J. (2007). User acceptance of virtual worlds: The hedonic framework. ACM SIGMIS Database, 38(4), 86–89.Google Scholar
  51. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, 2.Google Scholar
  52. Hsiao, K. L., Lu, H. P., & Lan, W. C. (2013). The influence of the components of storytelling blogs on readers’ travel intentions. Internet Research, 23(2), 160–182.Google Scholar
  53. Hsiao, I. Y., Lan, Y. J., Kao, C. L., & Li, P. (2017). Visualization analytics for second language vocabulary learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 161–175.Google Scholar
  54. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
  55. Hua, G., & Haughton, D. (2009). Virtual worlds adoption: A research framework and empirical study. Online Information Review, 33(5), 889–900.Google Scholar
  56. Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in second life. Computers & Education, 53(1), 169–182.Google Scholar
  57. Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J. A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education, 107, 1–12.Google Scholar
  58. Johnson, C. M., Vorderstrasse, A., & Shaw, R. (2009). Virtual worlds in health case higher education. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(2).Google Scholar
  59. Jones, C. M., Scholes, L., Johnson, D., Katsikitis, M., & Carras, M. C. (2014). Gaming well: Links between videogames and flourishing mental health. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 260.Google Scholar
  60. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  61. Jung, Y. (2011). Understanding the role of sense of presence and perceived autonomy in users' continued use of social virtual worlds. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 492–510.Google Scholar
  62. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of second life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business Horizons, 52(6), 563–572.Google Scholar
  63. Kaplanidou, K., & Vogt, C. (2006). A structural analysis of destination travel intentions as a function of web site features. Journal of Travel Research, 45(2), 204–216.Google Scholar
  64. Karppinen, P. (2005). Meaningful learning with digital and online videos: Theoretical perspectives. AACE Journal, 13(3), 233–250.Google Scholar
  65. Kemp, J., & Livingstone, D. (2006, August). Putting a second life “metaverse” skin on learning management systems. In Proceedings of the Second Life education workshop at the Second Life community convention (Vol. 20). CA, San Francisco: The University of Paisley.Google Scholar
  66. Kennedy-Clark, S. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on using scenario-based virtual worlds in science education. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2224–2235.Google Scholar
  67. Klein, L. R. (1998). Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research, 41(3), 195–203.Google Scholar
  68. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: NY, Guilford Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Inc: Guilford Publications.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., & Stieger, D. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 773–788.Google Scholar
  71. Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), 355–368.Google Scholar
  72. Lange, F. W., & Elliot, S. (2012). Understanding the role of social media in destination marketing. Tourismos: An international multidisciplinary journal of tourism, 7(1), 193–211.Google Scholar
  73. Lee, A., & Berge, Z. L. (2011). Second life in healthcare education: Virtual environment's potential to improve patient safety. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 3(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  74. Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of advertising, 31(3), 43–57.Google Scholar
  75. Lin, C. P., Tsai, Y. H., & Chiu, C. K. (2009). Modeling customer loyalty from an integrative perspective of self-determination theory and expectation-confirmation theory. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 315–326.Google Scholar
  76. López, I., & Ruiz, S. (2011). Explaining website effectiveness: The hedonic–utilitarian dual mediation hypothesis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
  77. MacKenzie, K., Buckby, S., & Irvine, H. (2013). Business research in virtual worlds: Possibilities and practicalities. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(3), 352–373.Google Scholar
  78. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41–62.Google Scholar
  79. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.Google Scholar
  80. Mannell, R. C., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1987). Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 14(3), 314–331.Google Scholar
  81. Mäntymäki, M., & Salo, J. (2011). Teenagers in social virtual worlds: Continuous use and purchasing behavior in Habbo hotel. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2088–2097.Google Scholar
  82. Mäntymäkia, M. Y., & Salo, J. (2013). Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo hotel. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 282–290.Google Scholar
  83. Martens, R., Gulikers, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 368–376.Google Scholar
  84. McBrien, J. L., Jones, P., & Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
  85. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.Google Scholar
  86. Meng, X. L., & Rubin, D. B. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework. Biometrika, 80(2), 267–278.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. Menzel, N., Willson, L. H., & Doolen, J. (2014). Effectiveness of a poverty simulation in second life®: Changing nursing student attitudes toward poor people. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 11(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
  88. Mørch, A. I., Hartley, M. D., & Caruso, V. (2015, July). Teaching interpersonal problem solving skills using roleplay in a 3D virtual world for special education: A case study in second life. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on (pp. 464-468). IEEE.Google Scholar
  89. Muir, T., Allen, J., Rayner, C., & Cleland, B. (2013). Preparing pre-service teachers for classroom practice in a virtual world: A pilot study using second life. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), p.Art. 3.  https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-03.
  90. Mummalaneni, V. (2005). An empirical investigation of web site characteristics, consumer emotional states and on-line shopping behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 526–532.Google Scholar
  91. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 42–62.Google Scholar
  92. Nambisan, S., & Nambisan, P. (2008). How to profit from a better “virtual customer environment”. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(3), 53–61.Google Scholar
  93. Neys, J. L. D., Jansz, J., & Tan, E. S. H. (2010). To persevere is to save the world: Exploring expertise in gaming. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on fun and games (fun and games ‘10). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  94. O’Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78–92.Google Scholar
  95. Oulasvirta, A., & Blom, J. (2007). Motivations in personalization behavior. Interacting with Computers, 20, 1–16.Google Scholar
  96. Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157–170.Google Scholar
  97. Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2015). On the value of second life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the higher education in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 445–466.Google Scholar
  98. Peng, W., Lin, J.-H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self- determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175–196.Google Scholar
  99. Perlusz, S. (2004). Emotions and Technology Acceptance: Development and Validation of a Technology Affect Scale. 2004 IEEE international engineering management conference.Google Scholar
  100. Petrakou, A. (2010). Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1020–1027.Google Scholar
  101. Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327.Google Scholar
  102. Proulx, J. N., Romero, M., & Arnab, S. (2017). Learning mechanics and game mechanics under the perspective of self-determination theory to foster motivation in digital game based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 48(1), 81–97.Google Scholar
  103. Przybylski, A. K., Weinstein, N., Ryan, R. M., & Rigby, C. S. (2009a). Having to versus wanting to play: Background and consequences of harmonious versus obsessive engagement in video games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 485–492.Google Scholar
  104. Przybylski, A., Ryan, R., & Rigby, C. (2009b). The motivating role of violence in video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(2), 243–259.Google Scholar
  105. Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B. (1994). Development and validation of a brief measure of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation: The AFS scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 506–515.Google Scholar
  106. Reinhard, C. D. (2010). Interviews within experimental frameworks: How to make sense of sense-making in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 3 (1). Retrieved from <https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/812/885>
  107. Richard, M. O., & Chandra, R. (2005). A model of consumer web navigational behavior: Conceptual development and application. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1019–1029.Google Scholar
  108. Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585–1604.Google Scholar
  109. Rogers, L. (2011). Developing simulations in multi-user virtual environments to enhance healthcare education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 608–615.Google Scholar
  110. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar
  111. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 344–360.Google Scholar
  112. Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 98–109.Google Scholar
  113. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.Google Scholar
  114. Schoonheim, M., Heyden, R., & Wiecha, J. M. (2014). Use of a virtual world computer environment for international distance education: Lessons from a pilot project using second life. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 36.Google Scholar
  115. Sheldon, K. M., & Filak, V. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 267–283.Google Scholar
  116. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1319–1331.Google Scholar
  117. Shin, D. H. (2009). The evaluation of user experience of the virtual world in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(6), 530–553.Google Scholar
  118. Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53, 1177–1187.Google Scholar
  119. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  120. Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777.Google Scholar
  121. Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Bowman, N. D., Reinecke, L., Lewis, R. J., & Eden, A. (2011). Media enjoyment as need satisfaction: The contribution of hedonic and nonhedonic needs. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1025–1042.Google Scholar
  122. Thomson, M. (2006). Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers' strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 104–119.Google Scholar
  123. Thornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J. M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121.Google Scholar
  124. Tokel, S. T., & İsler, V. (2015). Acceptance of virtual worlds as learning space. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(3), 254–264.Google Scholar
  125. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication – Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19(5), 539–573.Google Scholar
  126. Vella, K., Johnson, D., & Hides, L. (2015). Playing alone, playing with others: Differences in player experience and indicators of wellbeing. Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 3-12). ACM.Google Scholar
  127. Vrellis, I., Avouris, N., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2016). Learning outcome, presence and satisfaction from a science activity in second life. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1).Google Scholar
  128. Vriens, M., & Melton, E. (2002). Managing missing data. Marketing Research, 14, 12–17.Google Scholar
  129. Wang, F., & Burton, J. K. (2013). Second life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 357–371.Google Scholar
  130. Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tourism Management, 25, 709–722.Google Scholar
  131. Wankel, C. (2009). Management education using social media. Organization Management Journal, 6(4), 251–262.Google Scholar
  132. Warburton, S. (2009). Second life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414–426.Google Scholar
  133. Ward, T., Falconer, L., Frutos-Perez, M., Williams, B., Johns, J., & Harold, S. (2016). Using virtual online simulations in second life® to engage undergraduate psychology students with employability issues. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 918–931.Google Scholar
  134. Wehner, A. K., Gump, A. W., & Downey, S. (2011). The effects of second life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 277–289.Google Scholar
  135. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., & Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2274–2291.Google Scholar
  136. White, C. J., & Thompson, M. (2009). Self determination theory and the wine club attribute formation process. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(4), 561–586.Google Scholar
  137. Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management., 31(2), 179–188.Google Scholar
  138. Yuan, K. H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G. A., & Bentler, P. M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(3), 319–330.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  139. Zhou, Z., Jin, X. L., Vogel, D. R., Fang, Y., & Chen, X. (2011). Individual motivations and demographic differences in social virtual world uses: An exploratory investigation in second life. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 261–271.Google Scholar
  140. Zydney, J. M., & Seo, K. J. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 58(1), 77–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Chih Huang
    • 1
  • Sheila J. Backman
    • 2
  • Kenneth F. Backman
    • 2
  • Francis A. McGuire
    • 2
  • DeWayne Moore
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Tourism Leisure and Hospitality ManagementNational Chi Nan UniversityNantou CountyTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism ManagementClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations