Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 385–406 | Cite as

Teachers’ perceptions of out-of-class communication, teacher-student relationship, and classroom environment

  • Amir Abd Elhay
  • Arnon Hershkovitz
Article
  • 222 Downloads

Abstract

Communication between students and teachers is usually extended beyond the classroom’s time and space. This communication, referred to as out-of-class communication (OCC), may impact students’ academic, social, and emotional development. Today, OCC is facilitated via social media and instant messaging services, which may affect its nature. This quantitative study (N = 155) aims to analyze the impact of WhatsApp™-based OCC between middle- and high-school teachers and their students on two variables that are key to learning and teaching: Teacher-student relationship and classroom environment. The data was collected through teachers’ self-reported questionnaires. Overall, we find that despite manifested somewhat differently from traditional OCC, teachers’ use of WhatsApp for OCC is also associated with better relationship with students and with better classroom environment.

Keywords

Out-of-class communication Teacher-student relationship Classroom environment Instant messaging Online social networks 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Upon acceptance of this manuscript, the authors will make efforts to share the data collected in this research. Data will be shared via an open-access platform of our institution.

Informed consent

All data was collected without any identifying details of the participants. Being adults (i.e., over 18y/o), participants have read and signed an informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest that might have affected data collection and/or reporting.

Supplementary material

10639_2018_9782_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

References

  1. Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160–186.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, R. (2005). Development and validation of the teacher-student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.1.55-74.Google Scholar
  3. Asterhan, C. S. C., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2015.02.003.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Gosen, N. (2015). Different role perceptions and student-teacher relationship characteristics, among high school homeroom educators and subject teachers’ – Results from a qualitative research. Studia Edukacyjne, 36, 381–400.Google Scholar
  5. Bills, L. (2000). Politeness in teacher-student dialogue in mathematics: A socio-linguistic analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 40–47.Google Scholar
  6. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher–child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 934–946.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934.Google Scholar
  7. Black, L. W. (2005). Dialogue in the lecture hall: Teacher-student communication and students' perceptions of their learning. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 6(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
  8. Bolkan, S., & Holmgren, J. L. (2012). “You are such a great teacher and I hate to bother you but…”: Instructors’ perceptions of students and their use of email messages with varying politeness strategies. Communication Education, 61(3), 253–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.667135.Google Scholar
  9. Boren, R., Callahan, C., & Peugh, J. (2011). Out with the old, in with the new: Factor analyses of a classroom environment measure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(3), 214–224.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910383191.Google Scholar
  10. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231.Google Scholar
  11. Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1978). Context variables in teaching. Educational Psychologist, 12(3), 310–316.Google Scholar
  12. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337.Google Scholar
  13. Costine, J. (2017). Facebook messenger day hits 70M daily users as the app reaches 1.3B monthlies [Blog post]. Retreived from https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/14/facebook-messenger-1-3-billion/. Accessed 28 July 2018.
  14. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.  https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2.Google Scholar
  16. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2013.04.028.Google Scholar
  17. DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehleer, M., & Francis, A. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2009, pp. 329336). VA: Chesapeake.Google Scholar
  18. Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370193.Google Scholar
  19. Doering, A., Lewis, C., Veletsianos, G., & Nichols-Besel, K. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of instant messaging in two educational contexts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  20. Dorman, J. P. (2003). Relationship between school and classroom environment and teacher burnout: A LISREL analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 6(2), 107–127.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023296126723.Google Scholar
  21. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Buckley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management, and emotional environments. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 4(2), 131–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522449doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522449.Google Scholar
  23. Farley-Lucas, B. S., & Sargent, M. M. (2011). Enhancing out-of-class communication. To Improve the Academy, 30(1), 71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2011.tb00649.x.Google Scholar
  24. Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2014). Teacher-student relationship in the Facebook-era. In P. Isaías, P. Kommers, T. Issa (Eds.), The Evolution of the Internet in the Business Sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145–172). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  25. Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2018). Broadening communication yet holding back: Teachers’ perceptions of their relationship with students in the SNS-era. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 725–740.Google Scholar
  26. Forkosh-Baruch, A., Hershkovitz, A., & Ang, R. P. (2015). Teacher-student relationship and SNS mediated communication: Perceptions of both role-players. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 11, 273–289.Google Scholar
  27. Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–27). Elmsford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–34.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731.Google Scholar
  29. Golden, R. (2017, June 9). Poll: 43% of employees use instant messaging tools on the job. Available at https://www.hrdive.com/news/poll-43-of-employees-use-instant-messaging-tools-on-the-job/444599.
  30. Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2016). A meta-analytical review of students’ out-of-class communication and learning effects. Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 476–493.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103293.Google Scholar
  31. Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 623–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9446-9.Google Scholar
  32. Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 405–427.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258859.Google Scholar
  33. Gross, L. (2015). An examination of the relationship between the communication methods used in out-of-class student-faculty interactions and the content and frequency of those interactions (unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation). Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  34. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301.Google Scholar
  35. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Mink (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v09n01_12.Google Scholar
  36. Harfitt, G. J. (2014). Brokering dialogue between secondary students and teachres to co-construct appropriate pedagogy in reduced-size classes. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 212–228.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, P., Weibelzahl, S., & Hall, T. (2013). Text messaging for out-of-class communication: Impact on affective learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning. International Association for Development of the Information Society (pp. 5966).Google Scholar
  38. Helvie-Mason, L. (2011). Facebook, “friending,” and faculty–student communication. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Teaching arts and science with the new social media (cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, volume 3) (pp. 61–87). Bincley: Emerald Group Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000003007.Google Scholar
  39. Hershkovitz, A., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship and SNS-mediated communication: student perceptions. Comunicar, 53(4), 91–100.Google Scholar
  40. Hershkovitz, A., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Ang R. (2014). ‘I Miss My Students’: Characterizing Teachers Seeking Connection with Their Students via Social Networking Sites. In Media Conference, Tampere University, Finland, June. 2014.Google Scholar
  41. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48(1), 41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379151.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, K. a. (2011). The effect of twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 21–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798.Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2009.09.003.Google Scholar
  44. Khan, S., Shah, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). The role of out-of-class communication in instructor’s verbal/non-verbal behavior, trust, and student motivation. Business & Economic Review, 7(1), 81–100.Google Scholar
  45. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2011.01.005.Google Scholar
  46. Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54.  https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52.Google Scholar
  47. Kinchin, I. M. (2003). Effective teacher ↔ student dialogue: A model from biological education. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 110–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655864org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655864.Google Scholar
  48. Kio, S. I. (2016). Extending social networking into the secondary education sector. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 721–733.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12259.
  49. Knapp, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2002). Out-of-class communication: The development and testing of a measure. In The meeting of the Eastern Communication Association. New York.Google Scholar
  50. Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment? Child Development, 72(5), 1579–1601.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3654405.Google Scholar
  51. Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 175–185.Google Scholar
  52. MacAulay, D. J. (1990). Classroom environment: A literature review. Educational Psychology, 10(3), 239–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341900100305.Google Scholar
  53. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social media in academic practices. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2015.12.004.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2006). Students’ communication traits and their out-of-class communication with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 23(4), 283–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090600962599.Google Scholar
  55. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710.Google Scholar
  56. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923655.Google Scholar
  57. Ministry of Education. (2011). Ethics and protectedness on the internet (in Hebrew). Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  58. Ministry of Education. (2013). Using online social networks and collaborative communities in the education system (in Hebrew). Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  59. Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. (1974). Classroom environment scale manual. Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  60. Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17(2), 129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210409389382.Google Scholar
  61. Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 929–937.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290904.Google Scholar
  62. Myers, S. A., & Claus, C. J. (2012). The relationship between students’ motives to communicate with their instructors and classroom environment. Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 386–402.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688672.
  63. Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24(2), 241–261.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. Odewumi, O. M., Bamigboye, F. B., Olawuyi, O. F., & Bamigboye, O. O. (2017). Perceptions of undergraduate students on social media for learning: A case study of university of Ibadan. Journal of Communication, 8(2), 120–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0976691X.2017.1336269.Google Scholar
  65. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 73–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653025.Google Scholar
  66. Pawlowska, D. K., Westerman, J. W., Bergman, S. M., & Huelsman, T. J. (2014). Student personality, classroom environment, and student outcomes: A person–environment fit analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2014.10.005.Google Scholar
  67. Pianta, R. C. (1992). The student-teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  68. Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519.Google Scholar
  69. Poulou, M. (2014). The effects on students' emotional and behavioural difficulties of teacher–student interactions, students' social skills and classroom context. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 986–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3131.
  70. Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L., Breitmeyer, S., Keßler, S., Herrmann, E., & Regner, N. (2016). Students' perception of "good" and "bad" teachers – Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 31–44.Google Scholar
  71. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2010.03.002.Google Scholar
  72. Rönkkö, K., Urinboyev, R., Svensson, M., Svensson, L., & Carlsson, H. (2017). Literature review of social media in professional organisations 2000–2015: Work, stress, power relations, leadership, librarians, teachers, and social workers. Kristianstad University.Google Scholar
  73. Rosenberg, H., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2017). What’s app, sir? Teachers and students in WhatsApp groups (in Hebrew). In B. Shwartz, H. Rosenberg, & C. Asterhan (Eds.), Breaking down barriers? Teachers, students and social network sites (pp. 77–101). Tel Aviv, Israel: MOFET Books.Google Scholar
  74. Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437.Google Scholar
  75. Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262.Google Scholar
  76. Schwartz, J. (2016). The most popular messaging app in every country. Retrieved January 23, 2018, from https://www.similarweb.com/blog/worldwide-messaging-apps
  77. Sheer, V. C., & Fung, T. K. (2007). Can email communication enhance professor-student relationship and student evaluation of professor?: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(3), 289–306.  https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.d.Google Scholar
  78. Sidelinger, R. J., Bolen, D. M., McMullen, A. L., & Nyeste, M. C. (2015). Academic and social integration in the basic communication course: Predictors of students’ out-of-class communication and academic learning. Communication Studies, 66(1), 63–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.856807.Google Scholar
  79. Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2014.02.002.Google Scholar
  80. Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034823.Google Scholar
  81. Trickett, E. J., Qninlan, D. M., & Trickett, E. J. (1979). Three domains of classroom environment: Factor analysis of the classroom environment scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
  82. Tsuria, R., & Yadlin-Segal, A. (2017). Israel. In L. M. Steckman & M. J. Andrews (Eds.), Online around the world: A geographic encyclopedia of the internet, social media, and mobile apps (pp. 144–148). Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar
  83. van der Sijde, P. C., & Tomic, W. (1992). The influence of a teacher training program on student perception of classroom climate. Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(3), 287–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747920180306.Google Scholar
  84. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438.Google Scholar
  85. Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Motivating students to behave in socially competent ways. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 319–326.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1477395.Google Scholar
  86. Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–763.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131948.Google Scholar
  87. WhatsApp. (2017). Connecting one billion users every day (blog post). Retrieved from https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000631/Connecting-One-Billion-Users-Every-Day
  88. Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationship in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations