The effects on the student-teacher relationship in a one-to-one technology classroom
- 2.2k Downloads
This embedded case study explores the student-teacher relationship in a one-to-one technology environment. The actual change in relationship in a one-to-one classroom was examined. The study was guided by the self-system theory of motivation and its three characteristics of autonomy, relatedness, and competency as a theoretical framework. To explore this topic, the researchers considered the perspectives of four classroom teachers and 207 high school students at a suburban public high school in New Jersey. The case study research utilized teacher interviews, classroom observations, student surveys, and a student focus group. The findings revealed a notable change in the relationship between teachers and students within the one-to-one environment. The change existed in the connectivity between the teachers and their students beyond the classroom and school. The researchers concluded that the teachers and their students did have a positive relationship in a one-to-one environment and that relationship depended on the teacher’s ability to engage students using the one-to-one device. The researchers concluded that the one-to-one environment creates an autonomous learning environment for students; teachers and students have a relatedness that extends beyond the traditional boundaries of a school; and a higher level of competency in both teachers and students creates a more engaging classroom. As one-to-one technology environments are becoming more popular across the country, this study contributes to a better understanding of the expected changes in teacher-student relationships before issues of conflict occur.
KeywordsOne-to-one Educational technology Teacher-student relationships Classroom technology Self-system theory Student motivation Technology classroom environment
- Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system process. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: the Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 23). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ferlazzo, L. (2015). Strategies for helping students motivate themselves. Edutopia. Retrieved from www.edutopia.org/blog/strategies-helping-students-motivate-themselves-larry-ferlazzo.
- Foote, C. (2012). The evolution of a 1:1 iPad program. Internet@Schools. 15-18. Retrieved from: http://ajhs.auburn.cnyric.org/ajhs_library/01E90843-006ACFDF.0/The%20Evolution%20of%20a%201-1%20Ipad%20Program.pdf.
- Gehlbach, H., Brinkworth, M. E., & Harris, A. (2011). Social motivation in the secondary classroom: assessing teacher-student relationships and student outcomes. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 275–386). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Healy, J. M. (2011). Endangered minds: why children don’t think and what we can do about it. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Krathwohl, D. R., & Smith, N. L. (2005). How to prepare a dissertation proposal: suggestions for students in education and the social and behavioral sciences. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
- Mann, D. (2008). Documenting outcomes from Henrico county public school’s laptop computing initiative: 2005-06 Through 2007-08. Henrico County public schools Board of Education. Retrieved from http://www.hhenrico.k12.va.us/Pdf/DataReports/technicalreport 112408.pdf.
- Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Monroe Township. (2011). 21st century learning initiative. Retrieved from http://monroenj.schoolwires.com/monroenj/lib/monroenj/_shared/Monroe/The_Initiative.html.
- Ozdemir, M. (2015). Practices and attitudes of students and teachers using iPads in high school mathematics classes. Tablets in K-12 Education: Integrated Experiences and Implications, 262.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pinkham, C. A., & Johnson A. F. (2013). Spring 2013 teacher’s survey: MEPRI/MLTI middle and high school technology report. University of Southern Maine. Retrieved from http://usm.maine.edu/sites/default/files/cepare/Sprng2013SrvyBrief.pdf.
- Rockman, S., & Walker, L. (1997). Report of a laptop program pilot: a project for anytime anywhere learning by Microsoft Corporation, notebooks for schools by Toshiba America information systems. San Francisco: Rockman et al.Google Scholar
- Rockman, S., Chessler, M., & Walker, L. (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: second year study of the laptop program. San Francisco: Author.Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (Vol. 14). San Francisco: Sage.Google Scholar
- Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Silvernail, D. L., & Lane, D. M. M. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. Gorham: Maine Education Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, D. (2012). Writing the literature review (part one): step by step tutorial for graduate students. [vvideo file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyX3F_7gkLg.
- Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83 Retrieved from http://www.msuedtechsandbox.com/MAETELy2-2015/wp content/uploads/2015/07/the_flipped_classroom_article_2.pdf.Google Scholar
- Warschauer, M. (2005). Going one-to-one. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 34–38.Google Scholar
- Wellborn, J. G. (2013). Motivating unmotivated students: from theory to practice. Canadian School Counsellor, 39–42. Retrieved from candianschoolcounsellor.com.
- Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar