Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 757–775 | Cite as

Is the flipped classroom model for all? Correspondence analysis from trainee instructional media designers

  • Nikolaos PellasEmail author
Article

Abstract

The educational potentials and challenges of “flipping” a classroom are today well-documented. However, taking into account the contradictory results, literature on the benefits in using the flipped model as a socially inclusive technology-supported instructional design model is still in its infancy. This study seeks to investigate the perceptions of twenty-six (n = 26) trainee instructional media designers based on the access and use of a flipped instructional model, following an exploratory mixed method research with quantitative and qualitative data that was framed by learning concepts. Findings indicate that the flipped model supported really well exercises facilitating trainees’ participation, particularly those with specific reference to gender, age and web-based open educational resources (OER) level of frequency use. Regular recordings of difficulty with long-time content lectures were perceived as the most effective for flipped instructional model use showing that course design matters for knowledge gain. The study results also confirmed the view of flipped classroom as facilitating model for learning activities with trainees to be actively participated and not being passive receivers of the main instructor’s information or observers of other colleagues’ practices and experiments. In this context, which is defined by severe resource constraints and fear of using web-based transactions or sources among lecturers and trainees, the simplicity and accessibility of a flipped model promises a successful adoption for instructional media technology in Higher education.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Instructional media design courses Video lecturing Students’ socio-cognitive background 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Zahrani, A. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asef-Vaziri, A. (2015). The Flipped classroom of operations management: A Not-for-cost-reduction platform. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf.
  5. Bishop, J. L., & Vergeler, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Paper ID #6219). Retrieved August 27, 2013, from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/ papers/6219/view.
  6. Broderick, C. L. (2001). What is instructional design? Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from http://www.geocities.com/ok_bcurt/whatisID.htm.
  7. Butts, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, L., Chen, T., & Chen, N. (2015a). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6).Google Scholar
  9. Chen, S., Yang, S. & Hsiao, C. (2015b). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12278.
  10. Clinton, G., & Hokanson, B. (2011). Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: The Design/Creativity Loops model. Education Technology & Research Development. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9216-3.
  11. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLozier, S. & Rhodes, M. (2016). Flipped Classrooms: A Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9.
  14. Dove, A. (2013). Students’ Perceptions of Learning in a Flipped Statistics Class. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 393–398). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  15. Ferreri, S., & O'Connor, C. (2013). Instructional design and assessment. Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferriman, J. (2013). 9 Essential Instructional Designer Skills. Retrieved 10 May 2016 from https://www.learndash.com/9-essential-instructional-designer-skills/.
  17. Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using Lean in the Flipped Classroom for at Risk Students. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 356–366.Google Scholar
  18. Gilakjani, A., Sabouri, A., & Zabihniaemran, A. (2015). What Are the Barriers in the Use of Computer Technology in EFL Instruction? Review of European Studies, 7(11), 213–221.Google Scholar
  19. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hung, H. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.967701.
  21. Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124–131.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, L., Becker, SA., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). Horizon Report. Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  23. Kanuka, H. (2006). Instructional design and e-learning: A discussion of pedagogical content knowledge as a missing construct. The e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(2). [online]. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/docs/vol9_no2/papers/full_papers/kanuka.htm.
  24. Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students' learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lanham, J., Howard, Y., Drew, B., & Johns, D. (2013). STEM@1000mph: developing open educational resources in a live engineering project. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013, (3 Art. 19). Summer Issue.Google Scholar
  26. Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). Too much teaching, not enough learning; what is the solution? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(2), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, S., Farnan, J., & Arora, V. (2013). FUTURE: New strategies for hospitalists to overcome challenges in teaching and today's wards. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 8(7), 409–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mossley, D. (2013). Open educational resources and open education. Heslington, United Kingdom: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls690_109/Readings/Mossely2013- OERandOpenEducation.pdf.
  31. Nguyen, S., & Coryell, J. (2015). Flipping the Script in Study Abroad Participation: The Influence of Popular Culture and Social Networks. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  32. Nielsen, L. (2012). Five reasons I'm not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technology & Learning, 32(10), 46–56.Google Scholar
  33. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The Use of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Scoping Review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25(5), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OPAL Report (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to Open Educational Practices. Retrieved 23 August from: http://www.ucp.pt/site/resources/documents/CEPCEP/OPALReport2011-Beyond-OER.pdf.
  35. Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2014). Online and hybrid university-level courses with the utilization of Second Life: Investigating the factors that predict student choice in Second Life supported online and hybrid university-level courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 40(2), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porcaro, P. et al. (2016). Curriculum Design of a Flipped Classroom to Enhance Haematology Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9599-8.
  37. Reisser, R. (2016). Eight Trends Affecting the Field of Instructional Design and Technology: Opportunities and Challenges Learning and Knowledge Analytics in Open Education (pp. 139–147). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Rolfe, V., Alcocer, M., Bentley, E., Milne, D., & Meyer-Sahling, J. (2008). Academic staff attitudes towards electronic learning in Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 24 of February 2017 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?keyword=e-learning&article=204&article=313.
  39. Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: a case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152.Google Scholar
  40. Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339.Google Scholar
  41. Shields, P., & Rangarjan, N. (2013). A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater: New Forums Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60(2), 514–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toprak, E. & Genc-Kumtepe, E. (2014). Cross-Cultural Communication and Collaboration: Case of an International eLearning Project. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning. Retrieved 12 of August 2016 from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2014&halfyear=1& article=618.
  44. Yu, Z., & Wang, G. (2016). Academic Achievements and Satisfaction of the Clicker-Aided Flipped Business English Writing Class. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 298–312.Google Scholar
  45. Zhang, Y., Dang, Y. & Amer, B. (2016). A Large-Scale Blended and Flipped Class: Class Design and Investigation of Factors Influencing Students’ Intention to Learn. IEEE Transactions on Education. doi: 10.1109/TE.2016.2535205.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product and Systems Design EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanErmoupoliGreece

Personalised recommendations