Many educational institutions, especially higher education institutions, are considering to embrace smartphones as part of learning aids in classes as most students (in many cases all students) not only own them but also are also attached to them. The main question is whether embracing smartphones in classroom teaching enhances the learning or perhaps an interference. This paper presents the finding of our study on embracing smartphone in classroom teaching. The study was carried out through a survey and interview/discussion with a focus group of students. We found that they use their smartphones to access teaching materials or supporting information, which are normally accessible through the Internet. Students use smartphones as learning aids due many reasons such as they provide convenience, portability, comprehensive learning experiences, multi sources and multitasks, and environmentally friendly. They also use smartphones to interact with teachers outside classes and using smartphones to manage their group assignments. However, integrating smartphones in a classroom-teaching environment is a challenging task. Lecturers may need to incorporate smartphones in teaching and learning to create attractive teaching and optimum interaction with students in classes while mitigating or at least minimising distractions that can be created. Some of the challenges are distraction, dependency, lacking hands on skills, and the reduce quality of face-to-face interaction. To avoid any disturbances in using smartphones within a classroom environment, proper rules of using smartphones in class should be established before teaching, and students need to abide to these rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abeele, M. M. V. (2016). Mobile lifestyles: Conceptualizing heterogeneity in mobile youth culture. New Media & Society, 18(6), 908–926.
Achterkamp, R., Hermens, H. J., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R. (2016). The influence of vicarious experience provided through mobile technology on self-efficacy when learning new tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 327–332.
Ali, H. A. H., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Technology integration in the context of Brunei primary schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, July Special Issue 2 for INTE 2015, 558–568. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2456.5924.
Almunawar, M. N., Anshari, M., Susanto, H., & Chen, C. K. (2015). Revealing customer behavior on smartphones. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 6(2), 33–49.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Etgar, S. (2016). Intimacy and smartphone multitasking--a new oxymoron? Psychological Reports, 119(3), 826.
Anshari, M., & Alas, Y. (2015). Smartphones habits, necessities, and big data challenges. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 26(2), 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2015.09.005.
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2015a). Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, Springer, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9407-3.
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2015b). Pervasive Knowledge, Social Networks, and Cloud Computing: E-Learning 2.0. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 909–921. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1360a.
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Yunus, N. M., Sabtu, N. I., & Hamid, M. S. (2016). Online learning: trends, issues, and challenges in big data era. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(1), 121–134.
Au, M., Lam, J., & Chan, R. (2015). Social media education: Barriers and critical issues. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology (pp. 199–205). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Boyle, A. M., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2016). Staying connected: Computer-mediated and face-to-face communication in college students’ dating relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(5), 299–307.
Buchholz, A., Perry, B., Weiss, L. B., & Cooley, D. (2016). Smartphone use and perceptions among medical students and practicing physicians. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 5(1), 27–32.
Carlson, D., & Schrader, A. (2012). Dynamix: An open plug-and-play context framework for android. In Internet of Things (IOT), 2012 3rd International Conference on the (pp. 151–158). IEEE.
Cooper, C. (2015). Too much exposure to smartphone screens ruins your sleep, study shows. Retrieved January 3, 2017 from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/too-much-exposure-to-smartphone-screens-ruins-your-sleep-study-shows-10019185.html
Countrymeters (2015). Brunei Darussalam Population. Retreived June 05, 2015 from http://countrymeters.info/en/Brunei_Darussalam
CourseSmart (2011). Digital Dependence of Today’s College Students Revealed in New Study from Coursesmart. Retrieved April 16, 2015 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/01/idUS141122 01-Jun-2011 PRN20110601.
Cribbs, J. D., & Linder, S. M. (2015). Bridging environments in the elementary classroom. Childhood Education, 91(1), 41–45.
Davies, Z. (2015). Definition of:Smartphone. USA: PCMag Digital Group. Retrieved on April 16, 2015 from http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/51537/smartphone
Delello, J. A., Reichard, C. A., & Mokhtari, K. (2016). Multitasking among college students: are freshmen more distracted? International journal of cyber behavior. Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 6(4), 1–12.
Demb, A., Erikson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The notebook alternative: Student’s reactions and strategic implications. Computers & Education, 43, 383–401.
Evans, M. (2009). Mobility, games, and education. Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education (pp. 96–110). New York: NIG Publishing.
Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the oppressed (p. 51). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914.
García-Ormaechea, I., González, I., Duplá, M., Andres, E., & Pueyo, V. (2014). Validation of the preverbal visual assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire. Early human development, 90(10), 635–638.
Gerlich, R. N., Browning, L., & Westermann, L. (2010). The social media affinity scale: implications for education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(11), 35–42.
Grinols, A. B., & Rajesh, R. (2014). Multitasking with smartphones in the college classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 89–95.
Hiebert, M., Bowen, W. R., & Siemens, R. (2015). Implementing a social knowledge creation environment. Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(3), 9.
IPsmarx Technology Inc. (2015). Why Smartphone Use Is Growing in Southeast Asia and What It Means for ITSPs. Retrieved April 16, 2015 from http://www.ipsmarx.com/blog/why-smartphone-use-is-growing-in-southeast-asia-and-what-it-means-for-itsps/.
Katz, N. (2012) Teens and Smartphones: The Good The Bad and The Ugly. Retrieved April 16, 2015 from http://www.socialmoms.com/tech/teens-and-smartphones-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.
Kosnik, C., & Dharamshi, P. (2016). Intertwining Digital Technology and Literacy Methods Courses. In Building Bridges (pp. 163–177). SensePublishers.
Low, K. C. P., & Anshari, M. (2013). Incorporating social customer relationship management in negotiation. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 7(3/4), 239–252.
Matussin, H. S. H. H., Abdullah, N. A., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Integrating ICT and learning study in teaching conversion of travel graphs. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(4), 25–39.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298.
Nakamura, H., Hanamitsu, N., & Minamizawa, K. (2015). A (touch) ment: a smartphone extension for instantly sharing visual and tactile experience. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference (pp. 223–224). ACM.
Roblyer, M. D. (2002). Educational technology in context: the big picture. MD Roblyer, Integrating educational technology into teaching.
Rohani (2014). Kadar pengguna telefon bimbit, ‘smartphone’ meningkat. Brunei: Pelita Brunei. Retrieved April 16, 2015 from http://www.pelitabrunei.gov.bn/nasional/item/9737-kadar-pengguna-telefon-bimbit-smartphone-meningkat
Rouse, M. (2015). Smartphones. Massachusetts: TechTarget. Retrieved on April 16, 2015, from http://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/definition/smartphone
Shen, K. J., (2014). Brunei up to 45th place in Network Readiness Index. Retrieved June 23rd 2015 from http://www.bt.com.bn/news-national/2014/04/26/brunei-45th-place-network-readiness-index
Stephens, B. R. (2005). Notebook in psychology: conducting flexible In-class research and writing laboratories. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 101, 15–26.
Wang, Y. C. (2016). Exploring the Causes of Smartphone Dependency and Purchasing Behavior. In Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on (pp. 745–748). IEEE.
Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x.
Williams, A. J., & Pence, H. E. (2011). Smart phones, a powerful tool in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 683–686.
About this article
Cite this article
Anshari, M., Almunawar, M.N., Shahrill, M. et al. Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?. Educ Inf Technol 22, 3063–3079 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
- Education technology
- Education & Technology
- Learning aid
- Learning interference