Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1623–1650 | Cite as

Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting

  • Lila Lee
  • Susanne P. Lajoie
  • Eric G. Poitras
  • Miriam Nkangu
  • Tenzin Doleck
Article

Abstract

Learning to monitor and regulate one’s learning in an academic setting is a task that all students must engage in. Learning in “group” situations requires both self- and co-regulation. This research examines a case study of a small group of medical student interactions during an on-line problem based learning activity (PBL) where students learn to co-regulate their performance as they construct their understanding of how best to communicate bad news to patients. This paper introduces an approach for analyzing the group discourse to understand how collective knowledge building facilitates co-regulation. A mixed method analysis was used to analyze the case study data. A qualitative data analysis of verbal interactions was conducted to examine co-regulatory episodes. Collective knowledge building was examined by analyzing the group discourse for indicators of co-regulatory processes. The study follows two quantitative analyses: a frequency count analysis of types of questions asked by facilitators and students; and a sequential pattern mining for patterns of co-occurrences of learners’ discourse and co-regulation.

Keywords

Collaborative knowledge building Problem-based learning Self-regulated learning Co-regulation 

References

  1. Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New directions for teaching and learning, 1996(68), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  4. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1986). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work successfully with knowledge. In E. DeCorte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. V. Merrienboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55–68). Oxford England: Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.Google Scholar
  10. Buckman, R. (2005). Breaking bad news: The S-P-I-K-E-S strategy. Community Oncology, 2(2), 138–142.Google Scholar
  11. Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, C. K. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chi, M. T., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. D’Mello, S., Olney, A., & Person, N. (2010). Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  17. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. advances in learning and instruction series. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  18. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., Fischer, F., et al. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dilson, J. T. (1982). The multidisciplinary study of questioning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolmans, D. H., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.Google Scholar
  26. Hadwin, A. F., Wozney, L., & Pontin, O. (2005). Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher–student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Hmelo, C. E. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hmelo, C. E., & Lin, X. (2000). Becoming self-directed learners: Strategy development in problem-based learning. In D. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 227–250). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & DeSimone, C. (2013). Problem-based learning: An instructional model of collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 370–385). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and instruction, 21(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khosa, D. K. (2014). Processes of metacognitive regulation and knowledge co-construction in case-based collaborative learning at university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Murdoch University, Australia.Google Scholar
  38. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–117). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kinnebrew, J. S., Segedy, J. R., & Biswas, G. (2014). Analyzing the temporal evolution of students’ behaviors in open-ended learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laferrière, T., Montane, M., Gros, B., Alvarez, I., Bernaus, M., Breuleux, A., Allaire, S., Hamel, C., & Lamon, M. (2010). Partnerships for knowledge building: An emerging model. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 36(1).Google Scholar
  42. Lajoie, S. P., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: Does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine? Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lajoie, S. P., Hmelo-Silver, C., Wiseman, J., Chan, L. K., Lu, J., Khurana, C., Cruz-Panesso, I., Poitras, E., & Kazemitabar, M. (2014). Using online digital tools and video to support international problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2).Google Scholar
  44. Lajoie, S., Lee, L., Bassiri, M., Cruz-Panesso, I., Kazemitabar, M., Poitras, E., Hmelo-Silver, C., Wiseman, J., Chan, L., & Lu, J. (2015). The role of regulation in medical student learning in small groups: Regulating oneself and others’ learning and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Polman, J. L. (2004). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, D. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participating in a community of learners. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development (pp. 338–414). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: Influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  55. Schmidt, H. G., Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Hermans, H., ten Cate, T. J., Venekamp, R., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: Comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Academic Medicine, 71(6), 658–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children’s peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilkinson, L. & Friendly, M. (2009). The History of the Cluster Heat Map. The American Statistician, 63(2), 179–184.Google Scholar
  63. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Zimmermann, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lila Lee
    • 1
  • Susanne P. Lajoie
    • 1
  • Eric G. Poitras
    • 2
  • Miriam Nkangu
    • 3
  • Tenzin Doleck
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations