Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 399–415 | Cite as

The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues

  • Frances V. O’CallaghanEmail author
  • David L. Neumann
  • Liz Jones
  • Peter A. Creed


Web-based lecture technologies are being used increasingly in higher education. One widely-used method is the recording of lectures delivered during face-to-face teaching of on-campus courses. The recordings are subsequently made available to students on-line and have been variously referred to as lecture capture, video podcasts, and Lectopia. We examined the literature on lecture recordings for on-campus courses from the perspective of students, lecturers, and the institution. Literature was drawn from major international electronic databases of Elsevier ScienceDirect, PsycInfo, SAGE Journals, SpringerLink, ERIC and Google Scholar. Searches were conducted using key terms of lecture capture, podcasts, vodcasts, video podcasts, video streaming, screencast, webcasts, and online video. The reference sections of each article were also searched and a citation search was conducted. Institutions receive pressure from a range of sources to implement web-based technologies, including from students and financial imperatives, but the selection of appropriate technologies must reflect the vision the institution holds. Students are positive about the availability of lecture recordings. They make significant use of the recordings, and the recordings have some demonstrated benefits to student learning outcomes. Lecturers recognise the benefits of lecture recordings for students and themselves, but also perceive several potential disadvantages, such as its negative effect on attendance and engagement, and restricting the style and structure of lectures. It is concluded that the positives of lecture recordings outweigh the negatives and its continued use in higher education is recommended. However, further research is needed to evaluate lecture recordings in different contexts and to develop approaches that enhance its effectiveness.


Lecture recordings Lecture capture Podcasts Learning outcomes Attendance Engagement 



We are grateful to Mitchell Shepherd and Miriam Emad for database literature searches and/or manuscript formatting. This project was supported by strategic funding to the Teaching in Psychology Research Group, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University.


  1. Apple (2010). Why podcasting matters. Accessed 18 August 2014.
  2. Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (2001). Key statistics on higher education. Accessed 20 August 2014.
  3. Bassili, J. N. (2008). Media richness and social norms in the choice to attend lectures or to watch them online. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17, 453–475.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, T. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Behr, A. L. (1988). Exploring the lecture method: An empirical study. Studies in Higher Education, 13, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bligh, D. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Boezerooy, P. (2006). E-learning strategies of higher education institutions. Accessed 10 October 2014.
  8. Brotherton, J. A., & Abowd, G. D. (2004). Lessons learned from eClass: Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11, 121–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnett, B. M., & Meadmore, P. J. (2002) Streaming lectures: Enhanced pedagogy or simply “bells and whistles”? In P. L. Jeffery (Ed.), Australian Association for Research in Education 2002, Brisbane. Accessed 18 October 2014.
  10. Chang, S., (2007). Academic perceptions of the use of Lectopia: A University of Melbourne example. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of Ascilite, Singapore 2007. 6/1/08. Accessed 10 August 2014.
  11. Chester, A., Buntine, A., Hammond, K., & Atkinson, L. (2011). Podcasting in education: Student attitudes, behaviour and self-efficacy. Educational Technology and Society, 14, 236–247.Google Scholar
  12. Chu, K. C. (1999). What are the benefits of virtual laboratory on student learning? HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Collis, B. A., & Gommer, E. M. (2001). Stretching the mold, or a new economy? Part 1: Scenarios for the university in 2005. Educational Technology, 41, 5–18.Google Scholar
  14. Collis, B. A., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. Londen, UK: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  15. Collis, B. A., & van der Wende, M. C. (Eds.). (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education: An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in Higher Education. Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
  16. Cooke, M., Watson, B., Blacklock, E., & Manash, M. (2012). Lecture capture: First year nurses’ experiences of a web-based lecture technology. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 14–21.Google Scholar
  17. Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: Production and evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Couperthwaite, J., Hinrichsen, J., Shields, C. (2010). Modelling institutional approaches to web-based lecture technologies. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology and transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings of Ascilite, Sydney 2010 (pp. 236–239). -poster.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2014.
  19. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 355–366.Google Scholar
  22. DeAngelis, K. (2009). Lecture capture: Student opinion and implementation strategies. Teaching tip sheet UNC Charlotte Center for teaching and learning. Retrieved from
  23. Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2001). Higher education students: Time series tables, 2000: Department of Education, Science and Training. Accessed 18 August 2014.
  24. Donnan, P., Kiley, M., McCormack, C. (2004). Lecture streaming: Getting the pedagogy right. In OLT 2004 (pp. 44–52). Queenland, Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Fardon, M. (2003). Internet streaming of lectures: A matter of style. In Proceedings of Educause in Australasia, Adelaide, SA, 2009. Accessed 14 May 2014.
  26. Fulton, O. (2003). Managerialism in UK universities: Unstable hybridity and the complications of implementation. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 275–296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeill, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G., Woo, K. (2008). The impact of web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching. Accessed 20 June 2014.
  28. Heilesen, S. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting? Computers & Education, 55, 1063–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horvath, Z., O’Donnell, J. A., Johnson, L. A., Karimbux, N. Y., Shuler, C. F., & Spallek, H. (2013). Use of lecture recordings in dental education: Assessment of status quo and recommendations. Journal of Dental Education, 77, 1431–1442.Google Scholar
  30. Hove, M., & Corcoran, K. (2008). If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. James, R., Bexley, E., Devlin, M., Marginson, S. (2006). Australian university student finances 2006. Accessed 14 September 2014.
  32. Joy, M., Foss, J., King, E., Sinclair, J., Sitthiworachart, J., & Davis, R. (2014). Incorporating technologies into a flexible teaching space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 272–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 820–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kolowich, S. (2009). Fans and fears of lecture capture. Accessed 10 June 2014.
  35. Leadbeater, W., Shutterworth,T., Couperthwaite , J., & Nightingale, K. (2013). Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. Computers & Education, 61, 185–192.Google Scholar
  36. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mather, C., Caesar, L., Chin, C., & Fei, J. (2015). Class attendance and use of Echo360 in Australia: A comparison between undergraduate nursing and maritime disciplines. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2839–2845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.Google Scholar
  39. Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (2011). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynor, L. M., Barrickman, A. L., Stamatakis, M. K., Elliott, D. P. (2013). Student and faculty perceptions of lecture recording in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, Article 165.Google Scholar
  42. McClure, A. (2008). Lecture capture: A fresh look. Accessed 11 May 2014.
  43. McCombs, S., & Liu, Y. (2007). The efficacy of podcasting technology in instructional delivery. International Journal of Teachnology in Teaching and Learning, 3, 123–134.Google Scholar
  44. McCredden, J., & Baldock, T. (2009). More than one pathway to success: Lecture attendance, Lectopia viewing and exam performance in large Engineering classes. Proceedings from the 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Adelaide. SA, 2009. Google Scholar
  45. McCunn, P., & Newton, G. (2015). Student perception of topic difficulty: Lecture capture in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 252–262.Google Scholar
  46. McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGrath, D. (2015). Questions about lecture recording. Brisbane: Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation.Google Scholar
  48. McKinney, A. A., & Page, K. (2009). Podcasts and videostreaming: Useful tools to facilitate learning of pathophysiology in undergraduate nurse education? Nurse Education in Practice, 9, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Michela, J. L., & Burke, W. W. (2000). Organizational culture and climate in transformations for quality and innovation. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 117–129). London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Middlehurst, R. (2003). Cooperation, competition and ICT: Challenges and choices for higher education institutions. In M. C. Wende & M. van der Ven (Eds.), The use of ICT in higher education: A mirror of Europe (pp. 253–275). Utrecht: Lemma.Google Scholar
  51. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in five. Designing effective organisations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., Neumann, M. M. (2009). Statistics? You must be joking: The application and evaluation of humor when teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17. Accessed 1 May, 2014.
  54. Neumann, D. L., Neumann, M. M., Hood, M. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey that makes use of student data to teach statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 18. Accessed 1 May 2014.
  55. Neumann, D. L., Neumann, M. M., & Hood, M. (2011). Evaluating computer-based simulations, multimedia and animations that help integrate blended learning with lectures in first year statistics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., & Neumann, M. M. (2013). Using real-life data when teaching statistics: An evaluation of its impact on student engagement and learning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 12, 59–70.Google Scholar
  57. O’Hearn, J. (2000). Challenges for service leaders: Setting the agenda for the virtual learning organization. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. OECD. (2005). E-learning in tertiary education: Where do we stand? Paris, FR: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. Owston, R., Lupshenyuk, D., & Wideman, H. (2011). Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: Student perceptions and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paulo Kushnir, L., Berry, K., Wyman, J., Salajan, F. (2011). Lecture capture: Good student learning or good bedtime story? An interdisciplinary assessment of the use of podcasts in higher education. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 3168–3178).Google Scholar
  61. Phillips, R. (2005). Challenging the primacy of lectures: The dissonance between theory and practice in university teaching. Accessed 3 May 2014.
  62. Pons, D., Walker, L., Hollis, J., & Thomas, H. (2013). Evaluation of student engagement with a lecture capture system. Journal of Adult Learning, 40, 79–91.Google Scholar
  63. Sadik, A. (2015). Students’ preferences for types of video lectures: Lecture capture vs. screencasting recordings. International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salmon, G., & Angood, R. (2013). Sleeping with the enemy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 916–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Secker, J., & Bond, S. (2010). Lecture capture: Rich and strange, or a dark art? ALT-C 2010, University of Nottingham, London: September 06–09. Accessed 10 May, 2014.
  66. Secker, J., Bond, S., & Grussendorf, S. (2010). Lecture capture: Rich and strange, or a dark art? ALT-C 2010, 17th International Conference, Nottingham, UK, September 2010.Google Scholar
  67. Shelton, C. (2014). “Virtually mandatory”: A survey of how discipline and institutional commitment shape university lecturers’ perceptions of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 748–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Singh, G., O’Donoghue, J., Worton, H. (2005). A study into the effects of e-learning on higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2. Accessed 10 May 2014.
  69. Smith, J. (2005). From flowers to palms: Forty years of policy for online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 13, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sugar, W., Crawley, F., & Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7, 201–213.Google Scholar
  71. Taplin, R. H., Kerr, R., & Brown, A. M. (2014). Opportunity costs associated with the provision of student services: A case study of web-based lecture technology. Higher Education, 68, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toppin, I. N. (2010). Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student versus faculty perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 383–393.Google Scholar
  73. Toppin, I. N. (2011). Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student versus faculty perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Traphagan, T., Kusera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vajoczki, S., Watt, S., Marquis, N., & Holshausen, K. (2010). Podcasts: Are they an effective tool to enhance student learning? A case study from McMasters University, Hamilton Canada. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19, 349–352.Google Scholar
  76. Von Konsky, R. B., Ivins, J., & Gribble, J. S. (2009). Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 581–595.Google Scholar
  77. Walls, S. M., Kucsera, J. V., Walker, J. D., Acee, T. W., McVaugh, N. K., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Podcasting in education: Are students as ready and eager as we think they are? Computers & Education, 54, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Webster, J., & Trevino, L. (1995). Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1544–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, A., Birch, E., & Hancock, P. (2012). The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Young, J. R. (2008). The lectures are recorded, so why go to class? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accessed 20 May 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances V. O’Callaghan
    • 1
    Email author
  • David L. Neumann
    • 1
  • Liz Jones
    • 1
  • Peter A. Creed
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations