Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 297–315 | Cite as

Considering learning styles and context-awareness for mobile adaptive learning

  • Richard A. W. Tortorella
  • Sabine Graf
Article

Abstract

Mobile devices are becoming ubiquitous in our society and more so with school aged children. In order to get the most out of the portable computing power present at students' fingertips, this paper proposes an approach for providing mobile, personalized course content tailored to each individual’s learning style while incorporating adaptive context awareness. The respective approach has been implemented as an iOS application and the results of an evaluation with 45 students show that students were able to improve their comprehension of a subject matter by 23 % after using the application. The evaluation further demonstrated that not only is personalized mobile adaptive learning a successful method of instruction, but it is also very popular with the students who have used it.

Keywords

Intelligent context-aware learning system Mobile learning Ubiquitous learning Context awareness Adaptivity and personalization Learning styles 

References

  1. 1.
    Ako-Nai, F., Qing, T., Pivot, F., Kinshuk. The 5R adaptive learning content generation platform for mobile learning, 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 132–137.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J., Tailoring assessment to study student learning styles. In: American Association for Higher Education, 53.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briggs Myers, I. (1962). Manual: the myers-briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carver, C. A., & Howard, R. A. (1999). R.A., lane, W.D. Addressing different learning styles through course hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen-Chung, L. 2008. Beyond the ownership of handheld devices: active learning with ubiquitous learning minds, in: fifth IEEE international conference on wireless, mobile, and ubiquitous technology in education, (WMUTE 2008) 11–19.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fang, H., Liu, J., Huang, R., Li, Y. 2009. Research on adaptive mobile learning resources platform based on learning object model, in: international conference on application of information and communication technologies (AICT 2009) 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674–681.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felder, R.M., Soloman, B.A. Index of learning styles, Retrieved November 20, 2014. http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ILS.pdf.
  9. 9.
    Felder, R.M., Soloman, B.A. Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (1997). Retrieved November 20, 2014. http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
  10. 10.
    Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. Int. J. on Engineering Education, 21, 103–112.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graf, S., Lan, C.H., Liu, T.C., 2009. Kinshuk, investigations about the effects and effectiveness of adaptivity for students with different learning styles, in: proceedings of the IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT 2009) 415–419.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1982). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jung, H., Park, S., & Chung, K. S. (2006). An architecture for adaptive mobile learning. 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 219–223.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuljis, J., & Liu, F. (2005). Acomparison of learning style theories on the suitability for elearning. In M. H. Hamza (Ed.), Proc. of the IASTED conference on web technologies, applications, and services (pp. 191–197). Calgary: ACTAPress.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Livesay, G.A., Dee, K.C., Nauman, E.A., Hites, L.S., Engineering student learning styles: a statistical analysis using Felder’s Index of Learning Styles, in: Proc. of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (Montreal, Canada, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNutt, L., Brennan, M. 2005. Work in progress - Learning styles and elearning, what is the connection?, in: Frontiers in Education Conference (2005. FIE), F1H.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miso, S., Hornos, M.J., Rodriguez, M.L., 2012. Highly adaptive and context-aware intelligent system of urban events for mobile devices, 8th international conference on intelligent environments (IE 2012) 122–129.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen, V.A., Pham, V.C., Ho, S.D. 2010. A context - aware mobile learning adaptive system for supporting foreigner learning English, computing and communication technologies, research, innovation, and vision for the future (RIVF 2010) 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a web-based educational system: an experimental study, in: journal of computer assisted learning. Vol., 26, 243–257.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Razek, M.A., Bardesi, H.J. 2011. Towards Adaptive Mobile Learning System, in: 11th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2011), 493–498.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2014). To be or not to be in situ outdoors, and other implications for design and implementation, in geolocated mobile learning. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 14, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., Cheng, J. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). The development of mobile learning system for local history and geography of Taiwan, 2nd international Asia conference on informatics in control. Automation and Robotics, 3, 295–298.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tan, Q. (2009). Kinshuk, Kuo, Y.H., jeng, Y.L., Wu, P.H., huang, Y.M., Liu, T.C., chang, M., location-based adaptive mobile learning research framework and topics, in: international conference on computational science and. Engineering, 1, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tseng, J. C. R., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information, in: computers & education. Vol., 51, 776–786.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vinu, P. V., Sherimon, P. C., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Towards pervasive mobile learning – the vision of 21st century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3067–3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Virvou, M., & Alepis, E. (2004). Mobile versus desktop facilities for an e-learning system: users' perspective. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol., 1, 48–52.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yau, J., Joy, M. 2007. A context-aware and adaptive learning ScheduleFramework for supporting learners' daily routines, in: second international conference on systems (ICONS '07) 31.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zamzuri, N.H., Kassim, E.S., Shahrom, M. 2010. The role of cognitive styles in investigating E-learning usability, in: international conference on e-education, e-business, e-management, and e-learning, (IC4E '10) 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zywno, M. S. (2003). A contribution to validation of score meaning for felder–soloman’s index of learning styles, in: proceedings of the annual conference of the American society for engineering education. USA: Nashville.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.School of Computing and Information SystemsAthabasca UniversityEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations