Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1807–1819 | Cite as

Examining middle school students’ views on text bullying

  • Ali SemerciEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to examine middle school students’ views on text bullying in regard to gender, grade level, reactions to bullying and frequency of internet use. The participating 872 students were selected through simple random sampling method among 525 schools located in central Ankara. The data were collected via a questionnaire and a survey ‘Middle School StudentsViews on Safe Internet Use Survey’. The current study utilized the data drawn from the use of mobile phone dimension of the survey. Frequency, percentage and chi-square analyses were employed. The research findings illustrated that male students are significantly more likely to become victims of text bullying compared with female students. Yet, surprisingly female students displayed bullying behaviours more often than male students. Regarding the reactions of students to bullying, there was no significant relation by gender. The findings revealed that the victims informed their parents about the case of text bullying they experienced. Compared with the 6th and the 7th grades, the 8th grades were less likely to be bullied; in contrast, they were more likely to bully the other grades. The results also illustrated that the frequency of internet use is negatively associated with the frequency of text bullying. Another salient finding of the study indicated the majority of victims eventually became bullies by responding the text messages they had received.

Keywords

Text bullying Cyber bullying Bully Victim Middle school students 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the advice and support offered by Prof. Dr. Hafize KESER. The author would also like to thank M. Kemal AYDIN for his support and contribution on this manuscript.

References

  1. Agatston, W. P., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Students’ perspective on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akyürek, S. (2011). Çocuklarda iletişim araçları bağımlılığı: anket çalışması teknik raporu. Ankara: Bilge Adamlar Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi.Google Scholar
  3. Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Sarıbeyoglu, S., Cıplak, S., Yılmaz, N., et al. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aydoğan, D., Dilmaç, B., & Deniz, M. E. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde sosyal destek ve siber zorbalığın incelenmesi. 18. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 1–3 Ekim, İzmir.Google Scholar
  5. Bal, E. (2013). Teknoloji çağında cep telefonu kullanım alışkanlıkları ve motivasyonlar: Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine bir inceleme. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  6. Besley, B. (2008). Cyberbullying: an emerging threat to the “always on” generation. Canadian Teacher Magazine, 18–20.Google Scholar
  7. Brunker, M. (2009). ‘Sexting’ surprise: teens face child porn charges. MSNBC. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28679588/. Accessed 24 December 2014.
  8. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: an old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cellular News. (2005). Teens prefer mobiles to the internet. http://www.cellular-news.com/story/13286.php. Accessed 28 December 2014.
  10. Ceyhan, E. (2008). Ergen ruh sağlığı açısından bir risk faktörü: İnternet bağımlılığı. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 15(2), 109–116.Google Scholar
  11. Chadwick, S. (2014). Impacts of cyberbullying, building social and emotional resilience in schools. Springer Briefs in Education. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04031-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. M. (2013). Top child health concerns: obesity, drug abuse and smoking. http://mottnpch.org/sites/default/files/documents/081913Top10.pdf. Accessed 22 December 2014.
  14. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drennan, J., Brown, M. R., & Mort, G. S. (2011). Phone bullying: impact on self-esteem and well-being. Young Consumers, 12(4), 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2011). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erdur-Baker, Ö., & Kavşut, F. (2007). A new face of peer bullying: cyber bullying. Journal of Euroasian Educational Research, 27, 31–42.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, M. C. (2010). “Principals’ perceptions of cyberbullying policies in selected Florida middle schools” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Florida: University of Central Florida, College of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Griezel, L., Finger, L. R., Bodkin-Andrews, G. H., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2012). Uncovering the structure of and gender and developmental differences in cyber bullying. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, W. (2010). Cyberbullying: identification, prevention and response. Cyberbullying research center. http://www.cyberbullying.us/Cyberbullying_Identification_Response_Fact_Sheet. Accessed 16 December 2014.
  21. Houck, C. D., Barker, D., Rizzo, C., Hannock, E., Norton, A., & Brown, L. (2014). Sexting and sexual behaviour in at-risk adolescents. Pediatrics, 133, (2).Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M. E., & Warden, D. (2004). Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer aggression and bullying: the influence of school-stage, gender, victimization, appraisal, and emotion. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Gómez-Vela, M., González-Gil, F., & Caballo, C. (2007). Problematic internet and cell-phone use: psychological, behavioural, and health correlates. Addiction Research and Theory, 15(3), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kavuk, M. (2011). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sanal zorba ve sanal kurban olma durumlarının incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  26. Keser, H., & Kavuk, M. (2015). Okulda siber zorbalık farkındalık anketinin geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
  27. Kocatürk, M. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı ile siber zorbalık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  28. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leitgeb, N. (2008). Mobile phones: are children at higher risk? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 158, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: the cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Mariek, V. A., & Rozane, C. (2013). Cyberbullying by mobile phone among adolescents: the role of gender and peer group status. Communications: The European Journal of Communication, 38(1), 107–118.Google Scholar
  32. Mark, K., Longinaker, N., Collinetti, E., Lowe, S., Husman, C., & Terplan, M. (2014). Gender differences in sexting behaviours among Chlamydia positive adolescents and young adult. Poster Presentations, 54, 34–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.117.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, L., McGee, R., Nada-Raja, S., & Williams, S. (2010). Brief report: text bullying and traditional bullying among New Zealand secondary school students. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClatchy, L. R. (2011). Mobile phones are school bullying tool. Tribune business news. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.ulb.ac.be/docview/840669128?accountid=17194. Accessed 1 January 2015.
  35. Mortazavi, S. M. J., Atefi, M., & Kholghi, F. (2011). The pattern of mobile phone use and prevalence of self-reported symptoms in elementary and junior high school students in Shiraz. Iran Journal of Medecine and Science, 36–2.Google Scholar
  36. NCH. (2005). Putting U in the picture. Mobile bullying survey. http://www.avaproject.org.uk/media/28482/mobile_bullying_report.pdf 28.12.2014. Accessed 08 January 2015.
  37. NCPC. (2014). What is cyberbullying? http://www.ncpc.org/topics/cyberbullying/what-is-cyberbullying. Accessed 24 December 2014.
  38. Netsafe. (2005). The text generation: mobile phones and New Zealand youth: a report of result from the internet Safety Group’s survey of teenage mobile phone use.Google Scholar
  39. O’Brien, M. (2010). Consuming talk: youth culture and the mobile phone. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Sociology, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Faculty of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  40. Oshima, N., Nishida, A., Shimodera, S., Tochigi, M., Ando, S., Yamasaki, S., Okazaki, Y., & Sasaki, T. (2012). The suicidal feelings, self-injury, and mobile phone use after lights out in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37(9), 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Özata, Z. F. (2009). İleri teknoloji yeniliği olarak akıllı telefonların genç tüketiciler tarafından benimsenmesinde etkili olan faktörler. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  42. Özcan, Y. Z., & Koçak, A. (2003). Research note: a need or status symbol? European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Özdemir, M., & Akar, F. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin siber zorbalığa ilişkin görüşlerinin bazı değişkenler bakımından incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(4), 605–626.Google Scholar
  44. Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raskauskas, J. (2007). Text-bullying among early adolescents. Kairaranga, 8(1), 17–21.Google Scholar
  46. Raskouskas, J. (2010). Text-bullying: associations with traditional bullying and depression among New Zealand adolescent. Journal of School Violence, 9(1), 74–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 643–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rolland, E. (2002). Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Educational Research, 44(1), 55–67.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Samkange-Zeeb, F., & Blettner, M. (2009). Emerging aspects of mobile phone use. Emerging Health Threats Journal. doi: 10.3134/ehtj.09.005.Google Scholar
  50. Schuz, J. (2005). Mobile phone use and exposures in children. Bioelectromagnetics, 7, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Serin, H. (2012). Ergenlerde siber zorbalık/ siber mağduriyet yaşantıları ve bu davranışlara ilişkin öğretmen ve eğitim yöneticilerinin görüşleri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  52. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., & Tippett, N. (2006). An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying. http://www.antibullyingalliance.org/ResearchandEvaluationTeamResearchReport.htm Accessed 23 October 2014.
  54. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Srivastava, L. (2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour. Behaviour and Information Technology, 24(2), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tamer, N., & Vatanartıran, S. (2014). Ergenlerin teknolojik zorbalık algıları. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying, 1(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  57. Text Bullying. (2014). http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/content/text-bullying.html Accessed 04 January 2015.
  58. Tochigi, M, Nishida, A, Shimodera, S, Oshima, N, Inoue, K, et al. (2012). Irregular bedtime and nocturnal cellular phone usage as risk factors for being involved in bullying: a cross-sectional survey of Japanese adolescents. PLoS ONE, 7 (9).Google Scholar
  59. Yaman, E., Eroğlu, Y., & Peker, A. (2011). Başa çıkma stratejileriyle okul zorbalığı ve siber zorbalık. İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.Google Scholar
  60. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yılmaz, H. (2011). Cyberbullying in Turkish middle schools: an exploratory study. School Psychology International, 32(6), 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations