Information practices and user interfaces: Student use of an iOS application in special education
A framework connecting concepts from user interface design with those from information studies is applied in a study that integrated a location-aware mobile application into two special education classes at different schools; this application had two support modes (one general and one location specific). The five-month study revealed several information practices that emerged from student attempts to overcome barriers within the application and the curriculum. Students engaged in atypical and unintended practices when using the application. These practices appear to be consequences of the user interface and information processing challenges faced by students. Abandoning activities was a strategic choice and was an unanticipated information practice associated with the application’s integration into lessons. From an information processing perspective, it is likely that students reinterpreted information in the location mode as housing application content rather than being location specific and the information practice of taking photos emerged as an expressive use of the device when an instrumental task was absent. Based on these and other emergent practices, we recommend functionality that should be considered when developing or integrating these types of applications into special education settings and we seek to expand the traditional definition of information practice by including human-computer interaction principles.
KeywordsMobile learning Human information processing Mobile applications User interfaces Special education Cognitive support tools Usability
- Ally, M. (2009). Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training. Edmonton: AU Press.Google Scholar
- Aphasia Institute (2003). What Is Aphasia? | The Aphasia Institute. Aphasia Institute. http://www.aphasia.ca/aboutaphasia.html.
- AppBrain (2013). Number of Available Android Applications - AppBrain. AppBrain. http://www.appbrain.com/stats/number-of-android-apps.
- Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Carey, K., Evreinov, G., Hammarstrom, K., & Raskind, M. (2000). Information and Communication Technology in Special Education. Analytical survey. UNESCO. http://www.iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214585.doc, last viewed March 2015.
- Demmans Epp, C., Campigotto, R., Alexander L., & Baecker, R. (2011). MarcoPolo: Context-Sensitive Mobile Communication Support. In FICCDAT: RESNA/ICTA, (pp. 4). Toronto, Canada. http://web.resna.org/conference/proceedings/2011/RESNA_ICTA/demmans%20epp-69532.pdf.
- Du, J., Sansing, W. & Yu, C. (2004). The Impact of Technology Use on Low- Income and Minority Students’ Academic Achievements: Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002.Google Scholar
- Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Hirotomi, T. (2007). Multifaceted user interface to support people with special needs (In the Proceedings of The Second Iasted International Conference On Human Computer Interaction, pp. 87–92). Anaheim: ACTA Press.Google Scholar
- Ingraham, N. (2013). Apple Announces 1 Million Apps in the App Store, More than 1 Billion Songs Played on iTunes Radio. The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/22/4866302/apple-announces-1-million-apps-in-the-app-store.
- Jacob, R. J. K. (1994). New Human-Computer Interaction Techniques. Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design.Google Scholar
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Bull, S. (2009). Theory-based support for mobile language learning: noticing and recording. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) 3 (2). doi:10.3991/ijim.v3i2.740.
- McLeod, S. A. (2008). Working Memory - Simply Psychology. http://www.simplypsychology.org/working%20memory.html.
- Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Penaz, P., & Zagler, W. (Eds.). (2014). Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 14th International Conference Proceedings. Paris: ICCHP.Google Scholar
- Mose, N. (2013). SMS linguistic creativity in small screen technology. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(22), 114–121. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/9564.Google Scholar
- Nielson, J. (1994). Heuristic Evaluation. In J. Nielson & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods (pp. 25–62). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- TDSB (2013). Special education report: Toronto District School Board. Special Education and Sections Programs, Toronto, ON. http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/Elementary/docs/SpecED/SpecED_EducationReport.pdf, last viewed March 2015.
- Tufte, E. R. (1989). Visual Design of the User Interface: Information Resolution, Interaction of Design Elements, Color for the User Interface, Typogragphy and Icons, Design Quality. Armonk: IBM.Google Scholar
- Turnbull, A. P. (1995). Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools. Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–56.Google Scholar