Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy


Although rapid advances in technology has allowed for the growth of collaborative e-learning experiences unconstrained by time and space, technology has not been heavily infused in the activities of teaching and learning. This article examines the theory of constructivism as well as the design of e-learning activities using constructivist principles. The manner in which constructivist theory supports e-Learning is explored, and extrapolating from this pedagogical theory, some implications are provided to model effective practices of the characteristics and capacities of this powerful learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adair-Hauck, B. (1996). Practical whole language strategies for secondary and university level FL students. Foreign Language Annals, 29(2), 253–270.

  2. Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

  3. Anderson, R., & Becker, J. (2001). School investments in instructional technology. Teaching, learning, and computing report, report 8. Retrieved from,

  4. Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (2001). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. New York: Prentice Hall.

  5. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  6. Cheese, P. (2003). What keeps universities from embracing e-learning? Retrieved from

  7. Collison, G., Elbaum, Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning. Effective strategies for moderators. Madison: Atwood Publishing.

  8. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  9. Downes, S. (2005). Some principles of effective e-learning. Retrieved from

  10. E-learning Centre. (2006). Retrieved from

  11. Gallant, G. (2000). Professional development for web-based teaching: overcoming innocence and resistance. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 88, 69–78.

  12. Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

  13. Gruber, H. E., & Voneche, J. J. (1977). The essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.

  14. Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41–61.

  15. Jonassen, H. D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

  16. Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–72.

  17. Kelly, A.E., (Ed.). (2003). Theme issue: the role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1).

  18. Lems, K. (1995). Whole language and the ESL/EFL classroom. (Report No. FL 022904). (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED384210).

  19. Miller, M. T., & Lu, M.-Y. (2003). Serving non-traditional students in e-learning environments: building successful communities in the virtual campus. Education Media International, 40(1–2), 163–169.

  20. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  21. Pantazis, C. (2002). Maximizing e-learning to train the 21st century workforce. Public Personnel Management, 31(1), 21–26.

  22. Pflaum, W. (2004). The technology fix: The promise and reality of computers in our schools. Alexandria: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  23. Reil, M., & Becker, H. (2000). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. New Orleans: AERA presentation. Retrieved from

  24. Reschny, S. (2003). E-learning: Benefits and challenges. Retrieved from

  25. Rogers, A. (1999). The origins of a global learning network. Retrieved from

  26. Sharp, V. (2006). Computer education for teachers: Integrating technology into classroom teaching (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  27. Shrum, J., & Glisan, E. (2000). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

  28. Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing Science Journal, 8, 263–279.

  29. Stokes, J. P. (2000). How e-learning will transform education. Retrieved from

  30. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). E-learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Retrieved from

  31. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  32. Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 127–132.

  33. Zeidman, B. (2003). Guidelines for effective e-learning. Retrieved from

  34. Zisow, M. (2000). Teaching style and technology. TechTrends, 44(4), 36–38.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jared Keengwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G. & Agamba, J. Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy. Educ Inf Technol 19, 887–898 (2014).

Download citation


  • e-Learning
  • Constructivism
  • Pedagogy
  • Technology
  • English language learners