Advertisement

Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 863–886 | Cite as

Technology and adolescents: Perspectives on the things to come

  • Raul L. KatzEmail author
  • Max Felix
  • Madlen Gubernick
Article

Abstract

Assuming that, given the processes of technology diffusion, adolescent behavior forecasts future consumption of digital information, it would seem pertinent to study the characteristics of teenager technology use. This research asks: What are the key patterns regarding the use of technology platforms by teenagers? Is technology usage among teenagers shaped by schools' disparate teaching philosophies and cultures? How is technology usage impacting the consumption of traditional print media? A survey designed to determine how high school students use technology was administered at a private boarding school in New Hampshire and a public school in New York. The research concluded that individuals' residing environment and context shape ICT adoption. School culture and geographic context drive behavioral technology usage patterns. Furthermore, consumption of information appears to be guided by a principle of complementarity. However, technology substitution should not be discarded. Finally, school culture incorporating and promoting technology use may contribute positively to knowledge acquisition, although technology adoption without controls could negatively impact the teaching experience. While directionally valid, the study results need to be validated by statistical research and case studies.

Keywords

Information technology Adolescent usage Learning environment Social media 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by Mr. Peter J. Karp, Principal at the Institute for Collaborative Education in New York, and Mr. Thomas Bazos, Dean of Students at the St. Paul’s School. in Concord, NH. Additionally, the authors would like to acknowledge research support by Taylor Berry, from the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, as well as the feedback of three anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Chen, M. (1990). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(3), 1–1. Web. April 4, 2013.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report (2011). Rep. OFCOM. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391. Sage Publications. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyle, C. L., & Vaughn, H. (2008). Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution? Bell Labs Technical Journal, 13, 13–17. Web. 1 Aug. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C. (2008). The network in the garden: An empirical analysis of social media in rural life. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1603–1612. Web. 31 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday. Print.Google Scholar
  7. Greenhow, C., Walker, J. D., & Kim, S. (2009). Millennial learners and net savvy teens? Examining internet use among low income students. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2). Web. 1 Aug. 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649. Web. 30 Jul. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hampton, K., Goulet, L., Rainie, L., Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Rep. Pew Research Center. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Hepp, A. (2011). Mediatization and the ‘molding force’ of the media. The International Communications Associations 2011 Virtual Conference. Web. 3 Apr. 2013Google Scholar
  11. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29.2, 105–134. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Kaiser, H. J. (2010). Daily media use among children and teens up dramatically from five years ago. Menlo Park: Henry J Kaiser Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Koprowski, G.J. (2006). Digital divide separates rural, urban Internet users. Tech News World. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Socialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  15. Lampe, C. (2009). Trends in the facebook use amongst college students. Presentation at Columbia Institute for Tele-Information conference. April 17, 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Macgill, A. R., & Arafeh, S. (2010a). Writing, technology and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Research Publications. Web. 2 Aug. 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Lenhart, A., Kling, R., Campbell, S. (2010b) Teens and mobile use. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Web. 2 Aug. 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Livingstone, S. (2003). Children’s use of the internet: Reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media & Society, 5(2), 147–166. LSE Research Online. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Gasser, U., Cortesi, S. (2013). Teens & technology 2013. Retrieved April 04, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-and-Tech.aspx.
  20. Mazman, Y. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. Hacettepe University 10(2). Web. 31 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  21. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. New York: Random House. Print.Google Scholar
  22. Murphy, S. (2011). Minority, low-income teens likely to use phones to get online. Tech News Daily. Web. 31 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  23. Offerman, S. (2012) 2012 adobe digital video advertising report. Web. 30 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  24. Piskorski, M. (2009). Networks as covers: Evidence from business and social on-line networks. Harvard Business School Working Paper OMT 10624Google Scholar
  25. Rideout, V., Saphir, M. (2012). Social media, social life: How teens view their digital lives. Common Sense Media Research Study Web. 30 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Schiano, D.J., Chen, C.P., Ginsberg, J., Gretarsdottir, U., Isaacs, E., Huddleston, M. (2002). Teen use of messaging media. Web. 30 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidbauer, M., & Löhr, P. M. (1999). Young people online. In P. M. Löhr & M. Meyer (Eds.), Children, television, and the new media: A reader of research and documentation in Germany. Luton: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101. Sage Journals. Web. 3 Apr. 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seal-Wanner, C. (2007). Teens and technology: The perfect storm? Web. 1 Aug.Google Scholar
  30. Stanger, J. D., & Gridina, N. (1999). Media in the home, 1999: The Fourth Annual Survey of Parents and Children. Washington, D.C: Annenberg Public Policy Center. Web. 4 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  31. Thurlow, C., & McKay, S. (2003). Profiling “new” communication technologies in adolescence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(1), 94–103. Web. April 4, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vahlberg, V. (2012). A survey of three studies about youth media usage. Web. 30 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Vann, M. (2012). Video games cut into teens’ reading, studying. ABC News. Web. 31 Jul. 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Finance and Economics, Business Strategy Research, Columbia Institute for Tele-InformationColumbia Business School, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.St. Paul’s SchoolConcordUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Collaborative EducationNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations