Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 345–359 | Cite as

Personality and learning styles surrounded by W3 software: The Macao Portuguese school case

  • João NegreirosEmail author
  • Zelia Baptista
  • Leanda Lee


One of the purposes of this study is to evaluate how the choice of teaching method can be assisted by knowledge of a student’s personality type and learning style. The present research is undertaken in the context of Web 2.0 tools use within the Portuguese literature subject at Escola Portuguesa de Macao (EPM). The Felder-Soloman index of learning style (ILS) and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) based upon Jung’s theory of psychological nature were used as measures of learning style and personality type with 8th grade EPM students. Descriptive and chi-squared correlation statistical results of the associations between personality and learners types are presented. These results are discussed positing that the knowledge of student’s personality traits and learning styles together may have a notable implication for teaching methods.


Felder and Soloman ILS Myers and Briggs MBTI Web 2.0 Escola Portuguesa de Macao (EPM) 



The authors would like to express our gratitude to all students of the 8th grade of EPM (Escola Portuguesa de Macau) for following all our instructions and participating in this study by using all the provided materials and answering the former questionnaires and quizzes necessary to pursue this research. To all of them, thank you very much. As well, the present authors would like to offer our sincerest gratitude to FDCT (The Science and Technology Development Fund) of Macao, China, for supporting this research through the project number 060/2010/A.


  1. Advanogy (2012). Overview of learning styles. Retrieved from
  2. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. EDUCASA Review, 41(2), 32–44. EDUCASE: Boulder, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In The theory and practice on online learning, 2nd edition, Terry Anderson (Edt), Athabasca University Press, ISBN 978-1-897425-08-4, 441 p.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education, JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from in April 2012.
  5. Carvalho, A. (2007). Rentabilizar an Internet no ensino básico e secundário: dos recursos e ferramentas online aos LMS. Revista Sísifo, 3, 25–40.Google Scholar
  6. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). A Systematic review of learning styles models in learning styles and pedagogy. Post-16 learning – a systematic and critical review. learning and skills research centre, ISSN 1 85338 918 8, pp. 7-13.Google Scholar
  7. Felder, R., & Soloman, B. (1988). Learning and teaching styles. Engineering education, 78, 674–681.Google Scholar
  8. Felder, R., & Soloman, B. (1993). Reaching the second tier: learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, L. (2004). Journey toward the caring classroom – using adventure to create communities. Wood N Barnes publishing & distribution, ISBN 1-885473-60-5, USA, 291 p.Google Scholar
  10. Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammer, A. (1996). MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ivanova, M. (2008). Multichannel self-organized learning and research in Web 2.0: TSSOL 2008 Tecnhnology. Proceedings Salzburg, Austria. Retrieved from in May 2012.
  13. Kuri, N. (2004). Tipos de personalidade e estilos de aprendizagem: Preposicoes para o ensino de engenharia. Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Tese de doutoramento, 324 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, G. (1982). People types & tiger stripes. A practical guide for learning styles (2nd ed.). Gainsville: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.Google Scholar
  15. Levin, J, Fox, J., & Forde, D. (2009). Elementary statistics in social research. Allyn & bacon, 11th Edition, ISBN 020-5570-690, 554 p.Google Scholar
  16. Martins, A. (2012). Jornal Público. Retrieved from in March 23, 2012.
  17. MBTI Foundation (2012). Retrieved from
  18. Mccaulley, M. (1990). The Myers-Briggs type indicator: A measure for individuals. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 22(4), 181. Academic Search Premier database.Google Scholar
  19. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from in May 2012.
  20. Ozturk, H., & Spurlin, J. (2003). Use of personality profiles in forming laboratory groups in two electrical and computer engineering courses. Nashville: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, R., & Peters, M. (1999). Targeting rural students with distance learning courses: a comparative study of determinant attributes and satisfaction levels. The Journal of Education for Business, 74(6), 351–356.Google Scholar
  22. Pittenger, D. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Salter, D., Evans, N., & Forney, D. (2012). A longitudinal study of learning style preferences on the Myers-Briggs type indicator and learning style inventory. Project Suse, 47(2), 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Scott, T., & Parsons, J. (2002). Use of Meyers-Briggs type indicator of the University of Tennesse engage - Freashman engineering program. Montreal: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
  25. Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. University of Manitoba. 61 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Souza, R. (2005). Uma proposta construtivista para a utilização de tecnologias na educação. Educação, aprendizagem e tecnologia – um paradigma para professores do século XXI. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.Google Scholar
  27. Stilwell, N., Wallick, M., Thal, S., & Burleson, J. (1998). Myers-Briggs type and medical specialty choice: a new look at an old question. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(1), 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-063361, 320 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Team Consonants (2009). Retrieved from
  30. Thorne, A., & Gough, H. (1999). Portraits of type: An MBTI research compendium (2nd ed.). Gainesville: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Waterloo University (2012). Understanding your learning style: the Soloman-Felder index of learning styles (Retrieved from
  32. Wikipedia (2012). Retrieved from
  33. William Smith College (2012). Retrieved from
  34. Zelia, B., & Negreiros, J. (2012). The Portuguese school of Macao, China: a traditional/Web 2.0 assessment facing different learning styles. Handbook of research on enterprise 2.0: technological, social and organizational dimensions. In M. Cunha, F. Moreira, J. Varajao (Eds.). Hershey, PA: Information science reference (in press).Google Scholar
  35. Zibran, M. (2012). Chi-Squared test of independence. University of Calgary, Canada. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Saint JosephMacaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Management, Faculty of BusinessMonash UniversityCaulfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations