Support options provided and required for modeling with DynaLearn—A case study
- 283 Downloads
Science educators strongly advocate the importance of scientific modeling within science education. Although widely advocated for students, modeling is a complex task involving integration of topics, “languages” and abstraction levels. Thus support for the modeling task and for developing modeling skills is required. The goal of our study was to explore how novice modelers use several support options while performing modeling assignments with DynaLearn—an intelligent learning environment for qualitative modeling. The support options differ by the type of support, the presentation of the support, the relation to previous support, the adaptation to the learner and timing. Findings are expected to influence modifications and further development of support methods as well as providing guidelines for effective teaching using DynaLearn. Additional contributions of the study are insights on how novice modelers approach a modeling task, what type of support they are looking for, how they use each of the different support types, and what kind of instructional interventions might be required.
KeywordsQualitative modeling Science education Scaffolding Intelligent support Transfer
The work presented in this paper is co-funded by the EC within the 7th FP, Project no. 231526, and Website: http://www.DynaLearn.eu.
- Beek, W., & Bredeweg, B. (2011). Diagnosis and assessment. DynaLearn, EC FP7 STREP project 231526, Deliverable D3.4.Google Scholar
- Beek, W., Bredeweg, B., & Latour, S. (2011). Context-dependent help for the DynaLearn modelling and simulation workbench. In G. Biswas, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15th International Conference, AIED 2011, Auckland, New Zealand, June 28–July 2011, pp. 420–422, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Bredeweg, B., & Struss, P. (2003). Current topics in qualitative reasoning (editorial introduction). AI Magazine, 24(4), 13–16.Google Scholar
- Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Beek, W., Salles, P., & Linnebank, F. (2010). Learning spaces as representational scaffolds for learning conceptual knowledge of system behaviour. In M. Wolpers, P.A. Kirschner, M. Scheffel, S. Lindstaedt, & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6383, 2010, Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2010, p47–61, Barcelona, Spain, September 28–October 1, 2010.Google Scholar
- Forbus, K. D., Carney, K., Sherin, B. L., & Ureel, L. C. (2005). VModel: a visual qualitative modeling environment for middle-school students. AI Magazine, 26(3), 63–72.Google Scholar
- Gracia, J., Liem, J., Lozano, E., Corcho, O., Trna, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., et al. (2010). Semantic Techniques for Enabling Knowledge Reuse in Conceptual Modelling. Proc. of 9th International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai (China), Springer, volume 6414, November 2010.Google Scholar
- Hammersley, M., & Gomm, R. (2000). Introduction. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method (pp. 1–16). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lozano, E., Gracia, J., Liem, J., Gómez-Pérez, A., & Bredeweg, B. (2011). Semantic feedback for the enrichment of conceptual models. K-CAP’11, June 26–29, 2011, Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
- Mehlmann, G., Häring, M., Bühling, R., Wißner, M., & André, E. (2010). Multiple agent roles in an adaptive virtual classroom environment. In Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 250–256). Springer.Google Scholar
- Muldner, K., & Conati, C. (2010). Scaffolding meta-cognitive skills for effective analogical problem solving via tailored example selection. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20(2), 99–136.Google Scholar
- Wißner, M., Bühling, R., Linnebank, F., Beek, W., & André, E. (2011). Integrated characters with dialogue and tutorial strategies. DynaLearn, EC FP7 STREP project 231526, Deliverable D5.4.Google Scholar