Education and Information Technologies

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 277–287

Technology’s Non-Neutrality: Past Lessons Can Help Guide Today’s Classrooms

  • Paula F. Furr
  • Ronald Ragsdale
  • Steven G. Horton
Article

Abstract

The benefits of classroom computers and associated technologies seem to be an accepted truism with those who question the benefits often dismissed as intractable Luddites. Educational technology has become big business both commercially and academically for today’s increasingly high-tech classrooms. Clearly, computers mark changes—permanent changes—in the way everyone lives, learns, works, and interacts globally. Ellul, Norman, and Postman, among others, have focused on the application of a technology and not on the “box” itself. All three have warned that although educators’ focus should be on the application, it is the characteristic of technology itself that shapes the future. History is replete with lessons and voices that support these warnings and provide a foundation for reasoned discussions of any technology’s Faustian bargains and its often unanticipated uses and consequences. The topic and open debate could not be more crucial or timeless, for how young minds, mental habits, and values are shaped in classrooms around the world affects everyone.

Keywords

social context research changing roles conditions for learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alliance for Childhood (2001) Fool’s gold: A critical look at computers and childhood. http://www.allianceforchildhood.net/projects/computers/computers_reports_fools_gold_6.htm
  2. Apps, J. W. (1978) Study Skills for those Adults Returning to School. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. (1998) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods 3rd edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Bolter, J. D. (1991) Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers; Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Bolter, J. (online) Writing spaces: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Retrieved March 8, 2004 http://www.ga3d.net/bolter/book.htm#
  6. Cuban, L. (1986) Teachers and Machines: The Classroom use of Technology since 1920. Teachers College Press, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Cuban, L. (2001) Oversold & Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Cuffaro, H. (1984) Microcomputers in education: Why is earlier better? Teachers College Record, 85(4), 559–568.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education. Collier Books, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenstein, E. (1993) The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Ellul, J. (1964) The Technological Society. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Ellul, J. (1981) Perspectives on our age. In W. H. Vandenberg (ed.). Canadian Broadcasting Corp, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  13. Ellul, J. (1990) The Technological Bluff. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapides, MI.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrmann, S. (1998, June) What outcomes assessment misses. Speech delivered at the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference. [On-line]. Available: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/outcomes.html
  15. Furr, P. (2002) The occurrence of incidental learning in higher education desktop video conferencing courses: An ethnographic study. Northwestern State University, Natchitoches, LA unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. Guernsey, L. (May 31, 2001) PowerPoint Invades the Classroom. The New York Times http://bama.ua.edu/~miner001/pptlink.htm
  17. Hellman, B. (February 27, 2003) Teachers fear impact of proposed budget cuts.Andover Townsman and Town Crossings http://www.andovertownsman.com/news/20030227/ED_001.html
  18. Hugo, V. (1955) Notre-Dame de Paris. The Heritage Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Kleiner, A. and Farris, E. (2002) Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2001. Education Statistics Quarterly, 4(4) http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/quarterly/winter/q3_1.asp
  20. McKenzie, J. (September, 2002) Scoring Power Points. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, (10)1. http://optin.iserver.net/fromnow/sept00/powerpoints.html
  21. Moore, G. A. (1991) Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. HarperBusiness, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, R. (March 28, 2004) Residents anticipate session. The Town Talk. Alexandria, LA.Google Scholar
  23. Neal, E. (1998, June) Does using technology in instruction enhance learning? or The artless state of comparative research. Horizon. [On-line] Available: http://horizon.unc.edu/ts/commentary/1998-06.asp
  24. Norman, D. A. (1993) Things that make us Smart. Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Norman, D. A. (1998) The Invisible Computer. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M. C. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2nd edition. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  27. Perkins, D. (1992) Smart Schools. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Postman, N. (1993) Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Postman, N. (1996) The End of Education. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Ragsdale, R. (1988) Permissible Computing in Education: Values, Assumptions, and Needs. Prager, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Ragsdale, R. (1997, March) Surprised by Technology: Unanticipated Outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  32. Ragsdale, R. and Durell, B. (1994) Final Report: Happy Valley Computer Project. Rural County Board of Education, Toronto.Google Scholar
  33. Scriven, M. (1974) Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation. In Evaluation in Education, W.J. Popham (ed.). Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. PP. 34–47.Google Scholar
  34. Scriven, M. (1991) Evaluation Thesaurus 4th edition. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  35. Tufte, E. (2003) The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, D. (2001) Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies 6(4), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula F. Furr
    • 1
  • Ronald Ragsdale
    • 2
  • Steven G. Horton
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Journalism and College of Education Graduate FacultyNorthwestern State UniversityNatchitochesUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationNorthwestern State UniversityNatchitochesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Journalism and College of Education Graduate FacultyNorthwestern State UniversityNatchitochesUSA

Personalised recommendations