Purpose Navicixizumab (OMP-305B83) is a bispecific antibody that inhibits delta-like ligand 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor. This Phase 1a trial assessed escalating doses of navicixizumab in refractory solid tumors patients. Design A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used followed by the treatment of additional patients in an expansion cohort. Study objectives were determination of the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and efficacy. Results Sixty-six patients were treated once every 3 weeks in 8 dose-escalation cohorts (0.5, 1, 2.5, 3.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 mg/kg) and an expansion cohort (7.5 mg/kg). The median age was 60 years and 68% of the patients were female. The most commonly enrolled tumor types were ovarian (12), colorectal (11) and breast, pancreatic, uterine and endometrial (4 each) cancers. As only 1 dose limiting toxicity occurred, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, but 7.5 mg/kg was chosen as the dose for the expansion cohort. The treatment related adverse events (≥15% of patients) were hypertension (57.6%), headache (28.8%), fatigue (25.8%), and pulmonary hypertension (18.2%). Pulmonary hypertension was mostly asymptomatic at doses ≤5 mg/kg (6 Gr1, 1 Gr2), but was more severe at higher doses (4 Gr2, 1 Gr3). Navicixizumab’s half-life was 11.4 days and there was a moderate (29%) incidence of anti-drug antibody formation. Four patients (3 ovarian cancer, 1 uterine carcinosarcoma) had a partial response and 17 patients had stable disease. Nineteen patients had a reduction in the size of their target lesions including 7/11 patients with ovarian cancer. Four patients remained on study for >300 days and 2 of these patients were on study for >500 days. Conclusions Navicixizumab can be safely administered with manageable toxicities and these data showed preliminary signs of antitumor activity in multiple tumor types, but was most promising in ovarian cancer. As a result these data justify its continued development in combination Phase 1b clinical trials.
Navicixizumab OMP-305B83 VEGF DLL4 pathway
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was supported by OncoMed Pharmaceuticals through research grants to the author’s Institutions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts were disclosed by any of the authors not affiliated with OncoMed. AMK, LX, and RS are employees of OncoMed, the study sponsor.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Clarke MF, Fuller M (2006) Stem cells and cancer: two faces of eve. Cell 124(6):1111–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainaud P, Contreres JO, Villemain A, Liu LX, Plouet J, Tobelem G et al (2006) The role of the vascular endothelial growth factor-Delta-like 4 ligand/Notch4-ephrin B2 cascade in tumor vessel remodeling and endothelial cell functions. Cancer Res 66(17):8501–8510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobov IB, Renard RA, Papadopoulos N, Gale NW, Thurston G, Yancopoulos GD, Wiegand SJ (2007) Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4) is induced by VEGF as a negative regulator of angiogenic sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(9):3219–3224CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Ridgway J, Zhang G, Wu Y, Stawicki S, Liang WC, Chanthery Y et al (2006) Inhibition of Dll4 signalling inhibits tumour growth by deregulating angiogenesis. Nature 444(7122):1083–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguera-Troise I, Daly C, Papadopoulos NJ, Coetzee S, Boland P, Gale NW et al (2006) Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature 444(7122):1032–1037CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Fischer M, Yen WC, Kapoun AM, Wang M, O'Young G, Lewicki J et al (2011) Anti-DLL4 inhibits growth and reduces tumor-initiating cell frequency in colorectal tumors with oncogenic KRAS mutations. Cancer Res 71(5):1520–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen WC, Fischer MM, Hynes M, Wu J, Kim E, Beviglia L et al (2012) Anti-DLL4 has broad spectrum activity in pancreatic cancer dependent on targeting DLL4-notch signaling in both tumor and vasculature cells. Clin Cancer Res 18(19):5374–5386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey T, Yen WC, Axelrod F, Basi J, Donigian L, Dylla S et al (2009) DLL4 blockade inhibits tumor growth and reduces tumor-initiating cell frequency. Cell Stem Cell 5(2):168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiorean EG, LoRusso P, Strother RM, Diamond JR, Younger A, Messersmith WA et al (2015) A phase I first-in-human study of Enoticumab (REGN421), a fully Human Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4) monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 21(12):2695–2703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith DC, Eisenberg PD, Manikhas G, Chugh R, Gubens MA, Stagg RJ et al (2014) A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of the anticancer stem cell agent demcizumab (anti-DLL4) in patients with previously treated solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 20(24):6295–6303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W (2004) Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(5):391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthy A, Jimeno A (2017) Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: a review. Pharmacol TherGoogle Scholar
Stransky N, Egloff AM, Tward AD, Kostic AD, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A et al (2011) The mutational landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Science 333(6046):1157–1160CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Coleman RL, Brady MF, Herzog TJ, Sabbatini P, Armstrong DK, Walker JL et al (2017) Bevacizumab and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(6):779–791CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Bamias A, Gibbs E, Khoon Lee C, Davies L, Dimopoulos M, Zagouri F et al (2017) Bevacizumab with or after chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: exploratory analyses of the AURELIA trial. Ann Oncol 28(8):1842–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck A, Wurch T, Bailly C, Corvaia N (2010) Strategies and challenges for the next generation of therapeutic antibodies. Nat Rev Immunol 10(5):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar