Investigational New Drugs

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1575–1584 | Cite as

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib and cetuximab in patients with advanced solid malignancies

  • Athanassios Argiris
  • Trevor M. Feinstein
  • Lin Wang
  • Tianbing Yang
  • Shruti Agrawal
  • Leonard J. Appleman
  • Ronald G. Stoller
  • Jennifer R. Grandis
  • Ann Marie Egloff


Background Combined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Src family kinases (SFK) may lead to improved therapeutic effects. We evaluated the combination of dasatinib, an inhibitor of SFK and other kinases, and cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. Patients and methods Patients with advanced solid malignancies received cetuximab intravenously on a standard weekly schedule and dasatinib orally, once daily at 3 dose levels: (1) 100 mg, (2) 150 mg, (3) 200 mg. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of dasatinib were performed prior to starting cetuximab and following 14 days of treatment. Results Twenty-five patients (3 dose level 1; 19 dose level 2; 3 dose level 3) were initially treated. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicities: 1 at dose level 2 (headache) and 2 at dose level 3 (headache, nausea). Grade 3–4 toxicities in more than 2 patients included: dyspnea (4), vomiting (4), nausea (3), hypersensitivity reactions (3), headache (3) and anemia (3). Twenty-one patients developed headache (8 grade 1; 10 grade 2), which occurred after the loading of cetuximab and lasted 1–3 days. Six additional patients were treated with dasatinib starting 3 days after the loading dose of cetuximab; none developed headache after dasatinib. Dasatinib pharmacokinetics and a transient decrease in SFK PY416 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were not altered by cetuximab. Patients with higher plasma TGF-alpha levels had worse progression-free survival. Conclusions Dasatinib 150 mg once daily plus weekly cetuximab is recommended for phase II studies. Early-onset headache was ameliorated by starting dasatinib after cetuximab.


Dasatinib Cetuximab Src Epidermal growth factor receptor Phase I Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic 



Supported in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb, and the Head and Neck SPORE Grant No. P50 CA097190-06 from the National Cancer Institute

Role of funding sources

BMS provided drug and support for the study costs and pharmacokinetics; the Head and Neck Cancer SPORE provided support for the conduct of the correlative studies.

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Argiris, Grandis and Egloff have received research funding from BMS

Supplementary material

10637_2011_9732_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (136 kb)
Figure S1 (PPT 136 kb)
10637_2011_9732_MOESM2_ESM.ppt (136 kb)
Figure S2 (PPT 135 kb)
10637_2011_9732_MOESM3_ESM.xls (34 kb)
ESM 1 (XLS 34 kb)


  1. 1.
    Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, Koralewski P, Diaz-Rubio E, Rolland F et al (2007) Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy.[see comment]. J Clin Oncol 25(16):2171–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, Needle MN, Kopit J, Mayer RJ (2004) Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor.[see comment]. J Clin Oncol 22(7):1201–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au H-J et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. New Engl J Med 357(20):2040–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tice DA, Biscardi JS, Nickles AL, Parsons SJ (1999) Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(4):1415–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maa MC, Leu TH, McCarley DJ, Schatzman RC, Parsons SJ (1995) Potentiation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated oncogenesis by c-Src: implications for the etiology of multiple human cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(15):6981–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishizawar R, Parsons SJ (2004) c-Src and cooperating partners in human cancer. Cancer Cell 6:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egloff AM, Grandis JR (2009) Improving response rates to EGFR-targeted therapies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: candidate predictive biomarkers and combination treatment with Src inhibitors. J Oncol 2009:896407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Summy JM, Gallick GE (2003) Src family kinases in tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22(4):337–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Q, Thomas SM, Xi S, Smithgall TE, Siegfried JM, Kamens J et al (2004) SRC family kinases mediate epidermal growth factor receptor ligand cleavage, proliferation, and invasion of head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res 64(17):6166–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koppikar P, Choi SH, Egloff AM, Cai Q, Suzuki S, Freilino M et al (2008) Combined inhibition of c-Src and epidermal growth factor receptor abrogates growth and invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 14(13):4284–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leung EL-H, Tam IY-S, Tin VP-C, Chua DT-T, Sihoe AD-L, Cheng L-C et al (2009) SRC promotes survival and invasion of lung cancers with epidermal growth factor receptor abnormalities and is a potential candidate for molecular-targeted therapy. MolCancer Res: MCR 7(6):923–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lombardo LJ, Lee FY, Chen P, Norris D, Barrish JC, Behnia K et al (2004) Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl- phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4- ylamino)thiazole-5-carboxamide (BMS-354825), a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. J Med Chem 47(27):6658–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang XD, Reeves K, Luo FR, Xu LA, Lee F, Clark E et al (2007) Identification of candidate predictive and surrogate molecular markers for dasatinib in prostate cancer: rationale for patient selection and efficacy monitoring. Genome Biol 8(11):R255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li J, Rix U, Fang B, Bai Y, Edwards A, Colinge J et al (2010) A chemical and phosphoproteomic characterization of dasatinib action in lung cancer. Nat Chem Biol 6(4):291–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kantarjian H, Cortes J, Kim DW, Dorlhiac-Llacer P, Pasquini R, DiPersio J et al (2009) Phase 3 study of dasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib: 15-month median follow-up. Blood 113(25):6322–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson FM, Saigal B, Talpaz M, Donato NJ (2005) Dasatinib (BMS-354825) tyrosine kinase inhibitor suppresses invasion and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 11(19 Pt 1):6924–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wheeler DL, Iida M, Kruser TJ, Nechrebecki MM, Dunn EF, Armstrong EA, et al (2009) Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with Src family kinases in acquired resistance to cetuximab. Cancer Biol Ther 8(8)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson FM, Bekele BN, Feng L, Wistuba I, Tang XM, Tran HT et al (2010) Phase II study of dasatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(30):4609–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooks HD, Glisson B, Lu C, Sabichi A, Johnson F, Ginsberg L et al (2009) Phase II study of dasatinib in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J Clin Oncol 27(15s):abstr 6022Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haura EB, Tanvetyanon T, Chiappori A, Williams C, Simon G, Antonia S et al (2010) Phase I/II study of the Src inhibitor dasatinib in combination with erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(8):1387–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luo FR, Barrett Y, Ji P, Holly P, McCann E, Rhyne P et al (2006) Dasatinib (BMS-354825) pharmacokinetics correlate with pSRC pharmacodynamics in phase I studies of patients with cancer: Results from CA180003. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 3046 2006Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mutsaers AJ, Francia G, Man S, Lee CR, Ebos JM, Wu Y et al (2009) Dose-dependent increases in circulating TGF-alpha and other EGFR ligands act as pharmacodynamic markers for optimal biological dosing of cetuximab and are tumor independent. Clin Cancer Res 15(7):2397–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Athanassios Argiris
    • 1
    • 5
  • Trevor M. Feinstein
    • 1
  • Lin Wang
    • 2
  • Tianbing Yang
    • 3
  • Shruti Agrawal
    • 4
  • Leonard J. Appleman
    • 1
  • Ronald G. Stoller
    • 1
  • Jennifer R. Grandis
    • 3
  • Ann Marie Egloff
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Bristol-Myers SquibbNew York CityUSA
  5. 5.Division of Hematology/OncologyUT Health Science Center at San Antonio Cancer Therapy & Research CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations