Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 139, Issue 3, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Two cases of unilateral cone-rod dysfunction with negative electroretinograms

  • Kenji OzawaEmail author
  • Shunsuke Takahashi
  • Kiyofumi Mochizuki
  • Yozo Miyake
Clinical Case Report



To report the findings in two patients with unilateral cone-rod dysfunction with the a-wave larger than the b-wave, i.e., negative-type, full-field electroretinogram (ERG).


Standard ophthalmological examinations were performed including the medical history, measurements of the best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressures, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and perimetry. ERG examinations were carried out with the ISCEV standard. Immunoblot analysis using the patient’s sera was performed to determine the presence of the recoverin1 antibody.


The common findings in these two patients were: unilateral, male sex, sudden onset of photophobia or a reduction in the vision at an advanced age, preserved visual acuity, no complaint of night blindness, normal fundus appearance, negative-type dark-adapted 3.0 ERGs with reduced a-wave amplitudes, absent light-adapted 3.0 ERGs, and very reduced but recordable dark-adapted 0.01 ERGs. In addition, the multifocal ERGs in all areas except that in a hexagonal area within a 2.5° radius of the fovea were very reduced. Patients with similar findings have been reported earlier, but the subnormal a-wave of the dark-adapted 3.0 ERGs and extensive morphological alterations of the retina in the posterior pole in the OCT images were different from those of the reported patients. The OCT images showed an indistinct interdigitation zone and discontinuous ellipsoid zone. Anti-recoverin antibodies were not detected.


Negative ERGs with severely reduced cone and rod components suggest that both the cone and rod bipolar cell visual pathways may be disturbed. Slightly decreased a-wave suggests minor abnormality of photoreceptors. It is important to determine whether these patients represent a new clinical entity or a phenotypic variation of an already described retinal disorder.


Cone-rod dysfunction Negative ERG Subnormal a-wave Normal fundus Normal visual acuity Unilateral 



We thank Professor Emeritus Duco Hamasaki of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute of the University of Miami, FL, for discussions and editing the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in these studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Miyake Y, Yagasaki K, Horiguchi M, Kawase Y, Kanda T (1986) Congenital stationary night blindness with negative electroretinogram. A new classification. Arch Ophthalmol 104(7):1013–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koh AH, Hogg CR, Holder GE (2001) The incidence of negative ERG in clinical practice. Doc Ophthalmol 102(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kido A, Ogino K, Miyake Y, Yanagida K, Kikuchi T, Yoshimura N (2016) Unilateral negative electroretinogram presenting as photophobia. Doc Ophthalmol 133(1):71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Audo I, Robson AG, Holder GE, Moore AT (2008) The negative ERG: clinical phenotypes and disease mechanisms of inner retinal dysfunction. Surv Ophthalmol 53(1):16–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen H, Warburg M, Sjö O, Schwartz M (1995) Duchenne muscular dystrophy: negative electroretinograms and normal dark adaptation. Reappraisal of assignment of X linked incomplete congenital stationary night blindness. J Med Genet 32(5):348–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG (1993) Negative electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(12):3253–3263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimura A, Nemoto H, Nishimiya J, Yuasa T, Yamazaki H (2004) Spinocerebellar degeneration with negative electroretinogram: dysfunction of the bipolar cells. Doc Ophthalmol 108(3):241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robson AG, Richardson EC, Koh AH, Pavesio CE, Hykin PG, Calcagni A, Graham EM, Holder GE (2005) Unilateral electronegative ERG of non-vascular aetiology. Br J Ophthalmol 89(12):1620–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holder GE, Robson AG, Pavesio C, Graham EM (2005) Electrophysiological characterization and monitoring in the management of birdshot chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 89(6):709–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gass JD, Braunstein RA (1983) Further observations concerning the diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 101(11):1689–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kellner U, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH (1995) Severe course of cutaneous melanoma associated paraneoplastic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 79(8):746–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roels D, Ueno S, Talianu CD, Draganova D, Kondo M, Leroy BP (2017) Unilateral cancer-associated retinopathy: diagnosis, serology and treatment. Doc Ophthalmol 135(3):233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kondo M, Sanuki R, Ueno S, Nishizawa Y, Hashimoto N, Ohguro H, Yamamoto S, Machida S, Terasaki H, Adamus G, Furukawa T (2011) Identification of autoantibodies against TRPM1 in patients with paraneoplastic retinopathy associated with ON bipolar cell dysfunction. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ayaki M, Oguchi Y, Matsuhashi M (1984) Unilateral night blindness with normal fundus. Am J Ophthalmol 98(5):630–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murayama K, Kawabata H, Adachi-Usami E (1999) An electrophysiological follow-up study on acquired unilateral nyctalopia. Eye (Lond). 13(Pt5):629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kondo M, Nakamura M, Tanikawa A, Kachi S, Hirai T, Miyake Y (2005) Acquired unilateral night blindness with negative ERG: nine-year follow-up. Retina 25(4):519–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M (2015) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 130(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monson DM, Smith JR (2011) Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 56(1):23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gass JD, Agarwal A, Scott IU (2002) Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy: a long-term follow-up study. Am J Ophthalmol 134(3):329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Piao CH, Kondo M, Ishikawa S, Okinami S, Terasaki H (2007) A case of unusual retinopathy showing features similar to acute zonal occult outer retinopathy associated with negative electroretinograms. Jpn J Ophthalmol 51(1):69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karagiannis D, Kontadakis GA, Kandarakis AS, Markomichelakis N, Georgalas I, Parikakis EA, Kabanarou SA (2014) Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy with atypical findings. Case Rep Med 2014:290696CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyGifu University Graduate School of MedicineGifuJapan
  2. 2.Kobe Eye Center, Next VisionKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations