Structural and functional changes in glaucoma: comparing the two-flash multifocal electroretinogram to optical coherence tomography and visual fields
- 234 Downloads
To correlate multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) findings in the macular area of glaucoma patients with automated perimetry (visual fields) and with optical coherence tomography (OCT).
A two-global flash mfERG (VERIS™) was recorded in 20 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The root mean square was calculated, and three response epochs were analysed: the direct component (15–45 ms) and two induced components (IC-1 at 45–75 ms and IC-2 at 75–105 ms). The central 10° of the mfERG was compared to the central 10° of the OCT and of the visual field. Responses grouped in a superior and in an inferior semicircle, extending between 10° and 20°, were also compared to the corresponding areas of the OCT and of the visual fields. In addition, the area of the papillomacular bundle was also analysed separately.
In glaucoma patients, mfERG responses showed a significant positive association with retinal thickness in the central 10° for IC2 (p = 0.001) and a trend for IC1 (p = 0.066). A significant association was found between the central IC1 and IC2 of the mfERG and corresponding perimetric sensitivities expressed in linear units (p < 0.01). The OCT showed a positive association with visual field sensitivities (p < 0.05) in all areas examined (p < 0.05). Separation of the papillomacular bundle area did not improve structure–function association further.
In our study, mfERG showed a statistically significant correlation with perimetric sensitivity measured in linear units and with structural macular changes detected with time-domain OCT.
KeywordsOptical coherence tomography Multifocal ERG Global flash multifocal ERG Glaucoma Structure–functional relations Visual field
This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) 32003B-135219 (A.M.P.); LHW Stiftung Lichtenstein (A.M.P.).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in the article.
- 13.Hare W, Ton H, Woldemussie E, Ruiz G, Feldmann B, Wijono M (1999) Electrophysiological and histological measures of retinal injury in chronic ocular hypertensive monkeys. Eur J Ophthalmol 9(Suppl 1):30–33Google Scholar
- 19.Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Shimada Y, Li Y (1999) A multifocal ERG protocol for testing retinal ganglion cell function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci S15Google Scholar
- 35.Weijland A, Fankhauser F, Bebie H, Flammer J (2004) Automated perimetry. Visual field digest, 5th edn. Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland, p 61Google Scholar
- 41.Pinto LM, Costa EF, Gross PB, Kavay MM, Fogaça L, Melo LAS Jr, Paranhos A Jr (2010) Evaluation of macular structure and function in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:E-Abstract 4913Google Scholar
- 46.Falsini B, Marangoni D, Salgarello T, Stifano G, Montrone L, Campagna F, Aliberti S, Balestrazzi E, Colotto A (2008) Structure–function relationship in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: interindividual and interocular analysis by OCT and pattern ERG. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246(8):1153–1162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar