Difficulties of motion-onset VEP interpretation in school-age children
- 164 Downloads
In adults, motion-onset visual evoked potentials (M-VEPs) with a dominant N2 peak represent a useful diagnostic tool. However, it is difficult to use this type of VEP in children because of the long maturation (up to 18 years) of M-VEPs, which is characterised by a gradual decrease in N2 peak latency and shape development. Moreover, in some children, M-VEPs are difficult to identify with standard stimuli.
We tested features of M-VEPs in 30 children (7–12 years) with the following set of standard stimuli used in our lab for examining adults (https://web.lfhk.cuni.cz/elf): low-contrast translation motion (TM) and expansion/contraction motion (ExCoM) in full field and in periphery (with central 20° masked). In 16 children, a high-contrast TM was also tested.
With standard (low-contrast) stimuli, a common M-VEP to TM and to ExCoM was detected in 77 and 83 % of children, respectively. The M-VEPs to ExCoM in the periphery were detected in only 43 % of children. An abnormal dominant P1 peak was found in 9 % of VEPs to TM, 12 % of VEPs to full-field ExCoM and 14 % of VEPs to peripheral ExCoM. The M-VEPs to all low-contrast stimuli displayed large inter-individual latency variability (N2 peak latency differed for more than 100 ms). High contrast (more suitable for the non-mature magnocellular pathway) shortened M-VEP latencies and improved amplitudes.
Our findings show that the maturation of motion perception in children is inter-individually variable, which limits the diagnostic use of M-VEPs.
KeywordsMotion-onset visual evoked potentials VEPs M-VEPs Children
This study was supported by the P37/07 (PRVOUK) program and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 309/09/0869.
Conflict of interest
- 9.Kuba M, Szanyi J, Gayer D, Kremlacek J, Kubova Z (2001) Electrophysiological testing of dyslexia. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 44(4):131–134Google Scholar
- 15.Göpfert E, Schlykowa L, Müller R (1988) Zur topographie des bewegungs VEP in menschen. Zeitschrift EEG-EMG 19:14–20Google Scholar
- 19.Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar