Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 155–162 | Cite as

Temporal resolution of orientation-defined texture segregation: a VEP study

  • Julie Lachapelle
  • Michelle McKerral
  • Colin Jauffret
  • Michael BachEmail author
Original Research Article


Orientation is one of the visual dimensions that subserve figure-ground discrimination. A spatial gradient in orientation leads to “texture segregation”, which is thought to be concurrent parallel processing across the visual field, without scanning. In the visual-evoked potential (VEP) a component can be isolated which is related to texture segregation (“tsVEP”). Our objective was to evaluate the temporal frequency dependence of the tsVEP to compare processing speed of low-level features (e.g., orientation, using the VEP, here denoted llVEP) with texture segregation because of a recent literature controversy in that regard. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in seven normal adults. Oriented line segments of 0.1° × 0.8° at 100% contrast were presented in four different arrangements: either oriented in parallel for two homogeneous stimuli (from which were obtained the low-level VEP (llVEP)) or with a 90° orientation gradient for two textured ones (from which were obtained the texture VEP). The orientation texture condition was presented at eight different temporal frequencies ranging from 7.5 to 45 Hz. Fourier analysis was used to isolate low-level components at the pattern-change frequency and texture-segregation components at half that frequency. For all subjects, there was lower high-cutoff frequency for tsVEP than for llVEPs, on average 12 Hz vs. 17 Hz (P = 0.017). The results suggest that the processing of feature gradients to extract texture segregation requires additional processing time, resulting in a lower fusion frequency.


Orientation Texture segregation Temporal resolution Visual-evoked potentials 



This work was supported by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant to M.M.), by the ‘Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec’ (scholarship to J.L.) and by the ‘Réseau FRSQ de recherche en santé de la vision’ (grant to M.M.).


  1. 1.
    Beck J (1966) Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape. Science 154:538–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Julesz B, Bergen JR (1983) Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell Syst Tech J 62:1619–1645Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nothdurft HC (1992) Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Percept Psychophys 52:355–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips GC, Wilson HR (1984) Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. J Opt Soc Am A 1:226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landy MS, Bergen JR (1991) Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Res 31:679–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nothdurft HC (1985) Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation. Vision Res 25:551–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamme VAF, van Dijk BW, Spekreijse H (1992) Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments. Vision Res 32:797–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kastner S, De Weerd P, Ungerleider LG (2000) Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: a functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 83:2453–2457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nothdurft H (2000) Salience from feature contrast: temporal properties of saliency mechanisms. Vision Res 40:2421–2435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motoyoshi I, Nishida S (2001) Temporal resolution of orientation-based texture segregation. Vision Res 41:2089–2105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bach M, Meigen T (1999) Electrophysiological correlates of human texture segregation, an overview. Doc Ophthalmol 95:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23:107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, Brigell M, Holder GE, Marmor MF, Tormene AP, Vaegan (2004) Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bach M (2000) Freiburg evoked potentials. Retrieved 2007-10-15, from <>
  16. 16.
    R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved 31.07.2006, from <>
  17. 17.
    Regan D (1989) Human brain electrophysiology. Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bach M, Meigen T (1992) Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation—effect of orientation gradient. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 33:#1349Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bach M, Meigen T (1997) Similar electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orientation, motion and stereo. Vision Res 37:1409–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kastner S, Nothdurft H-C, Pigarv IN (1997) Neuronal correlates of pop-out in cat striate cortex. Vision Res 37:371–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knierim JJ, van Essen DC (1992) Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 67:961–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lamme VA (1995) The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 15:1605–1615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee TS, Mumford D, Romero R, Lamme VA (1998) The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision. Vision Res 38:2429–2454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nothdurft HC, Gallant JL, Van Essen DC (1999) Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: correlates of “popout” under anesthesia. Vis Neurosci 16:15–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zipser K, Lamme VAF, Schiller PH (1996) Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 16:7376–7389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lachapelle J, Ouimet C, Bach M, Ptito A, McKerral M (2004) Texture segregation in traumatic brain injury–a VEP study. Vision Res 44:2835–2842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Lachapelle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michelle McKerral
    • 1
    • 3
  • Colin Jauffret
    • 4
  • Michael Bach
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation-Centre de réadaptation Lucie-BruneauMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Neurology-NeurosurgeryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  4. 4.McGill University Hospital Center-Research Institute, Montreal Children’s HospitalMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Sektion Funktionelle SehforschungUniversitäts-Augenklinik FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations