Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 129–135 | Cite as

The photopic negative response of flash ERG in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy

  • Hongling Chen
  • Mingzhi Zhang
  • Shizhou Huang
  • Dezheng WuEmail author
Original Research Article


Purpose To test how the PhNR of the flash ERG is affected in human nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Methods The PhNR was elicited with red stimuli (5 cd s/m2 with 4-min duration) and blue background (10 cd/m2). Standard Ganzfeld flash ERGs were recorded according to the ISCEV standard for the clinical electroretinogram (2004). A total of 81 diabetic patients with different severity levels of NPDR were examined. Forty-three age-matched normal controls were also studied. Results The amplitude of PhNR decreased significantly as DR progressed, while the implicit time was prolonged. Amplitudes of the PhNR in the control group, no DR, mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, and severe NPDR were 78.1 ± 15.1 μV, 69.0 ± 17.8 μV, 64.5 ± 13.2 μV, 45.9 ± 9.0 μV, and 33.7 ± 10.8 μV respectively, and the implicit times of PhNR were 71.5 ± 5.0, 72.0 ± 6.2, 73.6 ± 5.0, 75.7 ± 6.1, and 82.9 ± 7.8 min respectively. Compared to the control group, the reduction of PhNR amplitude in all diabetic groups was statistically significant. However, except for the OPs, the percent reduction of the amplitude of standard ERG waves was far less than that of the PhNR. The percent decrease in amplitude of the PhNR and ∑OPs was not significantly different in any diabetic group. However, the reduction of the amplitude of ∑OPs (and other standard ERG waves) was statistically significant only in moderate and severe NPDR groups. Conclusions PhNR is a sensitive indicator of the function of inner retina in diabetic patients. There is a potential role for the PhNR in assessing inner retinal damage and evaluating the effect of treatment in NPDR.


Electroretinogram Photopic negative response Diabetic retinopathy 


  1. 1.
    Lieth E, Gardner TW, Barber AJ et al (2000) Retinal neurodegeneration: early pathology in diabetes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 28:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber AJ (2003) A new view of diabetic retinopathy: a neurodegenerative disease of the eye. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27:283–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin PM, Roon P, VanElls TK et al (2004) Death of retinal neurons in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3330–3336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lopes de Faria JM, Russ H, Costa VP (2002) Retinal fibre layer loss in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 86(7):725–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barber AJ, Lieth E, Khin SA et al (1998) Neural apoptosis in the retina during experimental and human diabetes. Early onset and effect of insulin. J Clin Invest 102:783–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakazawa T, Takahashi H, Nishijima K (2007) Pitavastatin prevents NMDA-induced retinal ganglion cell death by suppressing leukocyte recruitment. J Neurochemistry 100:1018–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ (1997) Evidence that negative potentials in the photopic electroretinograms of cats and primates depend upon spiking activity of retinal ganglion cell axons. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:1024Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG et al (1999) The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram is reduced by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1124–1136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z et al (2001) The S-cone PhNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1266–1272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T et al (2000) Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2205–2211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG et al (2001) The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:514–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machida S, Gotoh Y, Tanaka M et al (2004) Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 137:938–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen H, Wu D, Huang S et al (2006) The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion. Doc Ophthalmol 113:53–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kizawa J, Machida S, Kobayashi T et al (2006) Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 50:367–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li B, Barnes GE, Holt WF (2005) The decline of the photopic negative response (PhNR) in the rat after optic nerve transection. Doc Ophthalmol 111:23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y (2004) Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 122:341–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M et al (2007) Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:820–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL, Klein RE et al (2003) Proposed international diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 101:1677–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolter J (1961) Diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 51:1123–1141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloodworth JMB Jr. (1962) Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 11:1–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rangaswamy NV, Shirato S, Kaneko M et al (2007) Effects of spectral characteristics of Ganzfeld stimuli on the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4818–4828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kenyon GT, Moore B, Jeffs J et al (2003) A model of high-frequency oscillatory potentials in retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci 20:465–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vigh J, Solessio E, Morgans CW et al (2003) Ionic mechanisms mediating oscillatory membrane potentials in wide field retinal amacrine cells. J Neurophysiol 90:431–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongling Chen
    • 1
  • Mingzhi Zhang
    • 1
  • Shizhou Huang
    • 2
  • Dezheng Wu
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Joint Shantou International Eye Center (JSIEC)The Shantou University/The Chinese University of Hong KongShantouChina
  2. 2.Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of OphthalmologySun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations