Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 67–73 | Cite as

Pattern VEPs before and after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal

  • Masahiro Suami
  • Atsushi Mizota
  • Yoshihiro Hotta
  • Minoru Tanaka
Original Paper

Abstract

Pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEPs) were used to assess the visual function before, and 1 and 6 months after removal of an idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) from eight eyes. All patients underwent a standard three-port pars plana vitrectomy to remove the ERM removal and cataract surgery. pVEPs were elicited by check sizes of 15′, 30′, 60′, and 120′ with a reversal rate of 2 reversals/s. One hundred responses were averaged with an analysis time of 300 ms. The amplitude ratio (affected eye/fellow eye) of the P100 component were significantly larger at 6 months with smaller check sizes, and the increase was accompanied by an improvement of the VA. The mean peak latency of P100 did not change significantly for all check sizes. We conclude that the improvement of the P100 amplitude with smaller check sizes resulted from the recovery of visual function after the ERM removal.

Keywords

Pattern VEP Epiretinal membrane Vitrectomy Visual function 

References

  1. 1.
    Hirokawa H, Jalkh AE, Takahashi M et al (1986) Role of the vitreous in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol 101:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laqua H. (1978) Pigmented macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 86:56–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDonald HR, Verre WP, Aaberg TM (1986) Surgical management of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 93:978–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shinoda K, Ishida S, Kawashima S et al (2000) A new method for quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:424–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moschos M, Apostolopoulos M, Ladas J et al (2001) Assessment of macular function by multifocal electroretinogram before and after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 21:590–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niwa T, Terasaki H, Kondo M et al (2003) Function and morphology of macula before and after removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1652–1656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arimura E, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S et al (2005) Retinal contraction and metamorphopsia scores in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2961–2966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghazi-Nouri SM, Tranos PG, Rubin GS et al (2006) Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 90:559–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG et al (2006) Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 113:388–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holder GE (2004) Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease. Eye 18:1133–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perossini M, Turio E, Perossini T et al (2005) Pattern VEP alterations in psoriatic patients may indicate a sub clinic optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 110:203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atilla H, Tekeli O, Ornek K et al (2006) Pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in optic nerve diseases. J Clin Neurosci 13:55–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lennerstrand G (1982) Delayed visual evoked cortical potentials in retinal disease. Acta Ophthalmol Copenh 60:497–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bass SJ, Sherman J, Bodis-Wollner I et al (1985) Visual evoked potentials in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1071–1074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ueda M, Adachi-Usami E (1992) Assessment of central visual function after successful retinal detachment surgery by pattern visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 768:482–485Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Negishi C, Takasoh M, Fujimoto N et al (2001) Visual evoked potentials in relation to visual acuity in macular disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehta MC, Katsumi O, Buzney SM et al (1992) Pattern reversal visual-evoked response as a prognostic indicator in macular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol 113:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tilanus MA, Cuypers MH, Bemelmans NA et al (1997) Prognostic value of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bemelmans NA, Tilanus MA, Cuypers MH et al (1997) Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 123:97–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ohn YH, Katsumi O, Matsui Y et al (1994) Snellen visual acuity versus pattern reversal Visual-evoked response acuity in clinical applications. Ophthalmic Res 26:240–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C et al (2004) Visual evoked potentials Standard. Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adachi-Usami E (1980) Stimulus field, element size and human visually evoked cortical potentials. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 23:227–235Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Suami
    • 1
    • 2
  • Atsushi Mizota
    • 1
  • Yoshihiro Hotta
    • 2
  • Minoru Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyJuntendo UniversityUrayasuJapan
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyHamamatsu University School of MedicineHamamatsuJapan

Personalised recommendations