Dialectical Anthropology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 109–128

Peasant–farmer movements, third world peoples, and the Seattle protests against the World Trade Organization, 1999



This article, based on interviews and documentary sources, examines the participation in the N30 anti-WTO protests of peasants and farmers and, more broadly, the dynamics of transnational protest. It argues that participation in the protests by people from the Global South was important in convincing developing-country WTO delegates to derail the trade talks. The article suggests that N30 in Seattle was more diverse than is usually appreciated, both in terms of the provenance of the participants and in terms of the activities in which they engaged. The significance of N30 has less to do with the proportion of demonstrators who came from the Global South (or of those “of color”) than with the impact that the Seattle events had on those who did come, on developing-country WTO delegates, and on other sympathizers who stayed home but nonetheless followed the situation closely.


Globalization Peasants and farmers Social movements Global south World Trade Organization 


  1. Ação da Cidadania conta a Fome a pela Vida et al. 2001. Llamado de Porto Alegre para las próximas movilizaciones. Pamphlet in files of author.Google Scholar
  2. Alegría, Rafael. 2001. Recorded interview with the author. Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  3. Alland Jr, Alexander, and Sonia Alland. 2001. Crisis and commitment: The life history of a French social movement, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, Maude, and Tony Clarke. 1998. MAI: The multilateral agreement on investment and the threat to American freedom. New York: Stoddart.Google Scholar
  5. BAYAN (Bagong Alyansang Makabayan [New Patriotic Alliance]). 1999. Anti-WTO rally defies permit denial. Email article datelined November 30. http://list.jca.apc.org/public/asia-apec/1999-December.txt. Accessed 15 Mar 2009.
  6. Boehm, Terry. 2002. Recorded interview with the author. Saskatoon.Google Scholar
  7. Borras Jr, Saturnino M. 2004. La via campesina: An evolving transnational social movement. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. TNI Briefing Series No. 2004/6.Google Scholar
  8. Borras Jr, Saturnino M. 2008a. La vía campesina and its global campaign for agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change 8(2/3): 258–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borras Jr, Saturnino M. 2008b. Re-examining the “agrarian movement-NGO” solidarity relations discourse. Dialectical Anthropology 32: 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borras Jr, Saturnino M., Marc Edelman, and Cristóbal Kay. 2008. Transnational agrarian movements: Origins and politics, campaigns and impact. Journal of Agrarian Change 8(2/3): 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bové, José, and François Dufour. 2001. The world is not for sale: Farmers against junk food. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Brecher, Jeremy. 1993. The hierarchs’ new world order—and ours. In Global visions: Beyond the new world order, ed. Jeremy Brecher, John Brown Childs, and Jill Cutler, 3–16. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cockburn, Alexander, and Jeffrey St. Clair. 2000. Five days that shook the world. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. de Armond, Paul. 2001. Netwar in the emerald city: WTO protest strategy and tactics. In Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy, ed. John Arquilla, and David Ronfeldt, 201–234. Santa Monica: National Defense Research Institute, RAND.Google Scholar
  15. Desai, Meghnad, and Yahia Said. 2001. The new anti-capitalist movement: Money and global civil society. In Global civil society 2001, ed. Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor, 51–78. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Desmarais, Annette Aurélie. 2002. The vía campesina: Consolidating an international peasant and farm movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 29(2): 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desmarais, Annette Aurélie. 2007. La via campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  18. Edelman, Marc. 2003. Transnational peasant and farmer movements and networks. In Global civil society 2003, ed. Mary Kaldor, Helmut Anheier, and Marlies Glasius, 185–220. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, Marc. 2008. Transnational organizing in agrarian Central America: Histories, challenges, prospects. Journal of Agrarian Change 8(2&3): 229–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edelman, Marc. 2009. Rooted cosmopolitans in transnational peasant and farmer movements. Paper for the XXVIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Rio de Janeiro, 11–14 June.Google Scholar
  21. European Campaign Against rBST. 1994. Brussels: Press release, November 21.Google Scholar
  22. GABRIELA (National Alliance of Women’s Organizations). 1999. Women’s statement against AoA/WTO. Email distributed November 29 by gab@info.com.ph. http://list.jca.apc.org/public/asia-apec/1999-December.txt.
  23. George, Susan. 2000. Fixing or nixing the WTO. In Globalize this! The battle against the World Trade Organization and corporate rule, ed. Kevin Danaher, and Roger Burbach, 53–58. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glassman, Jim. 2002. From Seattle (and Ubon) to Bangkok: The scales of resistance to corporate globalization. Environment and Planning D Society and Space 19(5): 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graeber, David. 2002. The anthropology of globalization (with notes on neomedievalism, and the end of the Chinese model of the nation-state). American Anthropologist 104(4): 1222–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hadden, Jennifer, and Sidney Tarrow. 2007. The global justice movement in the United States since Seattle. In The global justice movement: Cross-national and transnational perspectives, ed. Donatella della Porta, 210–231. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Hawken, Paul. 2000. Skeleton woman visits Seattle. In Globalize this! The battle against the World Trade Organization and corporate rule, ed. Kevin Danaher, and Roger Burbach, 14–34. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  28. Heller, Chaia. 2002. From scientific risk to paysan savoir-faire: Peasant expertise in the French and global debate over GM crops. Science as Culture 11(1): 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hernández Cascante, Jorge. 2002. Recorded interview with the author. Tibás, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  30. Hernández Navarro, Luis. 2000. The revolt of the globalized. In Globalize this! The battle against the World Trade Organization and corporate rule, ed. Kevin Danaher, and Roger Burbach, 41–43. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hirschman, Albert O. 1983. The principle of conservation and mutation of social energy. Grassroots Development 7(2): 3–9.Google Scholar
  32. Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus. 2000[1999]. Indigenous peoples’ Seattle declaration. In Globalize this! The battle against the World Trade Organization and corporate rule, ed. Kevin Danaher, and Roger Burbach, 85–91. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  33. IPA (International People’s Assembly). 1999. Statement of the Seattle International People’s Assembly condemning the state of siege in Seattle. December 10 email from bayan@iname.com Archived at http://list.jca.apc.org/public/asia-apec/1999-December.txt. Accessed 15 Mar 2009.
  34. ISGN (International South Group Network). 2000. ISGN forum in Bangkok. December 28 email from rcpd@info.com.ph Archived at http://list.jca.apc.org/public/asia-apec/1999-December.txt. Accessed 15 Mar 2009.
  35. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kidder, Thalia, and Mary McGinn. 1995. In the wake of NAFTA: Transnational workers networks. Social Policy 25(4): 14–21.Google Scholar
  37. Luneau, Gilles. 2001. Preface. In The world is not for sale: Farmers against junk food, ed. José Bové, and François Dufour, ix–xii. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Martínez, Elizabeth Betita. 2000a. The WTO: Where was the color in Seattle? Colorlines 3(1): 11–12.Google Scholar
  39. Martínez, Elizabeth Betita. 2000b. Where was the color in Seattle? Looking for reasons why the great battle was so white. Monthly Review 52(3): 141–149.Google Scholar
  40. Mittal, Anuradha. 1999. Action alert. Last week Seattle… this week Oakland. Email from foodfirst.org, December 9.Google Scholar
  41. Mora, Eduardo, Sonia Soto, Walden Bello et al. 1999. The WTO debacle in Seattle. A unity statement of Philippine social movements, labor groups, people’s organizations and NGOs, December 10. http://www.isgnweb.org/Publications/02-003.htm.
  42. Nelson, Paul. 2004. New agendas and new patterns of international NGO political action. In Creating a better world: Interpreting global civil society, ed. Rupert Taylor, 116–132. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  43. O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. 2000. Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pianta, Mario, and Mario Marchetti. 2007. The global justice movements: The transnational dimension. In The global justice movement: Cross-national and transnational perspectives, ed. Donatella della Porta, 29–51. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Patomäki, Heikki. 2001. Democratising globalization: The leverage of the Tobin tax. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  46. Ritchie, Mark. 1996. Cross-border organizing. In The case against the global economy and for a turn toward the local, ed. Jerry Mander, and Edward Goldsmith, 494–500. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  47. Ritchie, Mark. 2001. From Seattle to Doha: The role of agrarian movements in shaping the post-Bretton Woods world order. Paper presented on September 21 at the Yale Agrarian Studies Seminar, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  48. Rosset, Peter M. 2006. Food is different: Why we must get the WTO out of agriculture. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  49. Sandbrook, Richard, Marc Edelman, Patrick Heller, and Judith Teichman. 2007. Social democracy in the global periphery: Origins, challenges, prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Seattle Government. 2001. Seattle’s racial diversity in 2000. http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/static/race_LatestReleased_DPDS_006615.jpg. Accessed 30 Mar 2009.
  51. Seoane, José, and Emilio Taddei. 2001. De Seattle a Porto Alegre: Pasado, presente y futuro del movimiento anti-mundialización neoliberal. In Resistencias mundiales: De Seattle a Porto Alegre, ed. José Seoane, and Emilio Taddei, 105–129. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
  52. SIPA (Secretariat, International People’s Assembly). 2000. No to WTO/Seattle International People’s Assembly contribution to shutting down the World Trade Organization (WTO). http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/4677/sipa-pa.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2009.
  53. Smith, Jackie. 2002. Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements. In Globalization and resistance: Transnational dimensions of social movements, ed. Jackie Smith, and Hank Johnston, 207–227. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, Neil. 1993. Homeless/global: scaling places. In Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change, ed. Jon Bird, Barry Curtis, Tim Putnam, George Robertson, and Lisa Tucker, 87–119. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. van Rooy, Alison. 2004. The global legitimacy game: Civil society, globalization and protest. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vía Campesina. 1999a. Mobilization actions and incidences carried out at Seattle 28th November to 3rd December 1999. http://ns/sdnhon.org.hn/miembros/via/seattle%20incidences.htm. Accessed 27 Sept 2000 [Reprinted in Vía Campesina 2000].
  58. Vía Campesina. 1999b. Women farmers in Seattle say no to WTO. http://ns/sdnhon.org.hn/miembros/via/seattle%20women.htm. Accessed 27 Sept 2000 [Reprinted in Vía Campesina 2000].
  59. Vía Campesina. 2000. ¡Fuera la agricultura de la O.M.C.! Take agriculture out of the WTO, 25–28. Tegucigalpa: Vía Campesina.Google Scholar
  60. Waterman, Peter. 2001. Globalization, social movements and the new internationalisms, 2nd ed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  61. Waterman, Peter, and Jill Timms. 2005. Trade union internationalism and a global civil society in the making. In Global civil society 2004/5, ed. Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor, 178–202. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Wijkman, Per Magnus. 2003. US trade policy: Alternative tacks or parallel tracks? In Unilateralism and US foreign policy: International perspectives, ed. David Malone, and Yuen Foong Khong, 251–284. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  63. Wood, Lesley J. 2004. Breaking the bank & taking to the streets: How protesters target neoliberalism. Journal of World-Systems Research 10(1): 69–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyHunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations