Dialectical Anthropology

, Volume 30, Issue 3–4, pp 227–271 | Cite as

Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods and the Calling of an Ontological Epistemology of Participation

Article
First Online:

Abstract

Modern social research, as we know it now, emerged as a part of rise of modern social sciences in the context of transition to modernity. As an enterprise of modernity social research reflected some of the foundational assumptions of modernity. For example, the project of sociology was closely tied to the project of nation-state, embodying in its epistemology methodological nationalism. Social research also proceeded within the bounded logic of disciplines. But all these assumptions of modernity as well as their social manifestations have been subjected to fundamental criticisms and interrogations in the last decades. Both anti-systematic socio-cultural movements and critical discursive movements and new movements of ideas have challenged the modernist paradigms of pathology and normality as well as distinction between ontology and epistemology. In the background of critiques of modernity, social movements and processes of transformations the present essay submits some proposals for a creative and critical social research. It explores ways of moving beyond mere denunciations and critiques and embodying transformational theories and methods which would facilitate creative and critical research. The essay also calls for a new vocation of social research by pleading for a simultaneous engagement in activism and creative understanding, fieldwork and philosophical reflections, ontological self-cultivation and epistemic labour of learning.

Keywords

creative social research multivalued logic ontological sociality ontological epistemology of participation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Agarwala, Humanities and Social Sciences in the New Millennium: Therorizing in / for Society as Play, in A. K. Giri ed., Creative Social Rethinking Theories and Methods (Lexington Books, 2004), 253–272Google Scholar
  2. Alversson M., Skoldberg K. (2000) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankersmith F. R. (2001) The Sublime Dissociation of the Past: Or How to Be (Come) What One is No Longer, History and Theory 40(3), 295–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. F. R. Ankersmith, Aesthetic Politics (Standford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  5. Ankersmith F. R. (2002) Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Appadurai A. (2000) Grassroots Globalization and Research Imagination, Public Culture 12(1), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth F. (2002) Anthropology of Knowledge, Current Anthropology 43(1), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauman Z. (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck U. (2000) The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck U. (2002) The Cosmopolitan Society and its Enemies. Theory, Culture and Society 19(1–2), 17–44Google Scholar
  11. Beck U., E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Berlin I. (2001) The Power of Ideas. NY: PimlicoGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergson H. (1912) Creative Evolution. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Beteille, “Homo Hierarchicus, Home Equalis,” in idem: The Idea of Natural Inequality and Other Essays (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1983)Google Scholar
  15. Beteille A. (2000) Antinomies of Society. Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Beteille A. (2002) Sociology: Essays on Approach and Method. Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhaskar R. (2002a) Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence. Everyday Life and Emancipations, New Delhi: Sage PublicationGoogle Scholar
  18. Bhaskar R. (2002b) Meta-Reality. The Philosophy of meta-Reality, Volume I. A philosophy for the present. Creativity, Love and Freedom. The Bhaskar Series, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourdieu P. (1990) In Other Words: Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  20. P. Bourdieu, “Epilogue: On the Possibility of a Field of World Sociology,” in P. Bourdieu and J. S. Coleman, eds., Social Theory for a Changing Society (Westview, Boulder, 1991a), 373–387Google Scholar
  21. P. Bourdieu, The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger (Tr. Peter Collier) (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991b)Google Scholar
  22. P. Bourdieu, “The Practice of Reflexive Sociology (Paris Workshop), ” in P. Bourdieu and J.␣D.␣Wacquant, eds., An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar
  23. Bourdieu P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Bourdieu P. (2003) Participant Objectivation. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 9, 281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bourdieu P., L. J. D. Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Carretto J. (ed.) (1999) Religion and Culture by Michel Foucault. Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Chakraborthy, “The Irrelevance of Methodlogy and the art of the Possible: Reading Sen and Hirschman, “ in A.K. Giri eds., Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods, 169–184Google Scholar
  28. Clammer J. (1995) Difference and Modernity: Japan and Social Theory. London: Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Clammer, “Beyond Power: Alternative Conceptions of Being and Reconstitution of Social Theory,” in A. K. Giri, ed., Modern Prince and Modern (Transforming Power and Freedom, Sage, Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  30. J. Clammer, S. Piorier, and E. Schwimmer (eds.), “Introduction: The Relevance of Ontologies in Anthropology: Reflections on a New Anthropological Field,” in J. Clammer et␣al., eds., Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations (Toronto University Press, Toronto, 2004), 3–22Google Scholar
  31. Cohen A. 1994 Self-Consiousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Connolly W. (2001) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Connolly W. (2002) Neuropolitics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Dallmayr F. (1984) Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Dallmayr F. (1987) Critical Encounters: between Philosophy and Politics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Dallmayr F. (1991) Between Freiburg and Frankfurt: Toward a Critical Ontology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Dallmayr F. (1993) The Other Heidegger. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Dallmayr F. (1996) Beyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter. Albany: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Dallmayr F. (1998) Alternative Visions: Pathways in the Global Village. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  40. F. Dallmayr, Homelessness and Homecoming: Heidegger on the Road (Manuscript, University of Notre Dame, 2001a)Google Scholar
  41. F. Dallmayr, Resisting Totalizing Uniformity: Marin Heidegger on the Macht and Machenschaft,” in F. Dallmayr, ed., Achieving Our World: Toward a Global and Plural Democracy (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2001b)Google Scholar
  42. Dallmayr F. (2002) Dialouge Among Civilizations: Some Exemplary Voices. New York: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  43. Dallmayr, F., Peace Talks—Any Body Listening? (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  44. Dallmayr F. (ed.) (1999) Border Crossings: Toward a Comparative Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  45. Das V. 1995 Critical Events: Anthropological Perspectives on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford U. PressGoogle Scholar
  46. V. Das, “Whittgenstein and Anthropology,” Annual Review of Anthropology (1999)Google Scholar
  47. Das V. (2001) Violence and Translation. Anthropological Quarterly 75(1), 105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. V. Das, “Social Sciences and the Publics,” in V. Das, ed., Introduction to The Oxford Indian Companion to Sociology and Social Anthropology (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 2003), 1–29Google Scholar
  49. Elias N. (1991) The Society of Individuals. Cambridge, MA: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  50. Faubion J. D. (ed.) (1995) Rethinking the Subject: An Anthology of Contemporary European Social Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Fine M. (2002) The Mourning After. Qualitative Inquiry 8(2), 137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Flyvbjerg B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It can Succeed Again. Tr. Steven Sampson, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Focault M. 1984a What is Enlightment? In Rabinow P. (ed.) The Foucault Reader. NY: Pantheon BooksGoogle Scholar
  54. Frietag M. (2001) The Contemporary Social Sciences and the Problem of Normativity. Theses Eleven 65, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fromm E. (1950) Man for Himself. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  56. Fuchs M. (2004) Articulating the World: Social Movements, the Self-Transcendence of Society and the Question of Culture. In: A. K. Giri (eds) Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  57. D. Gasper, “Anecdotes, Situations, Histories: Varieties and Uses of Cases in Thinking About Ethics and Development Practice,” in P. Q. van Ufford and A. K. Giri, eds., A Moral Critique of Development: in Search of Global Responsibilities (Routledge, London, 2003), 194–220Google Scholar
  58. Giddens A. (1996) In Defense of Sociology: Essays. Interpretations and Rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  59. Gatens M., & G. Lloyd (1999) Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Geertz C. 1973 Interpretation of Cultures. NY: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  61. Geertz C. (2000) Available Light: Philosophical Reflections on Anthropological Topics. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. A. K. Giri, ‘Creating a Community of Discourse in Sociology in India,” Economic and Political Weekly, August 1993Google Scholar
  63. A. K. Giri, “Self, Other and the Challenge of Culture,” in idem, Global Transformations: Postmodernity and Beyond (Rawat, Jaipur, 1998)Google Scholar
  64. Giri A. K. (2002) Conversations and Transformations: Toward a New Ethics of Self and Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books and Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  65. A. K. Giri, “Social Science Research: Call of Home and the World,” Economic and Political Weekly. August 2003Google Scholar
  66. A. K. Giri, “Knowledge and Human Liberation: Jurgen Habermas. Sri Aurobindo and Beyond,” European Journal of Social Theory (2004)Google Scholar
  67. Giri A. K. (2004b) Reflections and Mobilizations: Dialogues with Movements and Voluntary Organizations. New Delhi: SageGoogle Scholar
  68. Gingrich A., R. Fox (eds.) (2002) Anthropology, By Comparison. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Gorz A. (1999) Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Based Society. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  70. Greco J. (2001) Virtues and Rules in Epistemology. In: Abrol F., L. Zagzebski (eds), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  71. Gubrium J. F., J. A. Holstein (eds.) (1997) The New Language of Qualitative Method. NY: Oxford U. PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Habermas J. (1971) Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
  73. Habermas J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  74. Hardt M., A. Negri (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. PressGoogle Scholar
  75. Hardt M., A. Negri (1994) Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  76. N. Hanrahan, Difference in Time: A Critical Theory of Culture (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000)Google Scholar
  77. Hawthorn G., 1991 Plausible Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge U. PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Knorr-Cetina K. (2001) Postsocial Relations: Theorizing Society in a Postsocial Environment. In: G. Ritzer, & B. Smart (eds). Handbook of Social Theory. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  79. Luhman N. (2001) Notes on the Project ‚Poetry and Social Theory’. Theory, Culture & Society 18(1), 15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Inglis F. (2000) Clifford Geertz: Culture, Custom and Ethics. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  81. T. Ingold, “A Circumpolar Night’s Dream,” in J. Clammer, et␣al., eds., Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations (Toronto University Press, Toronto, 2004), 25–57Google Scholar
  82. Mintz S. W. (2000) Sow’s Ears and Silver Linings: A Backward Look at Ethnography. Current Anthropology 41(2), 169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. G. Marcus and M. Fischer, Anthropology as Cultural Critique (Chicago, 1986)Google Scholar
  84. Melucci A. (1996) The Playing Self: Person and Meaning in the Planetary Society. Cambridge: Cambridge U. PressGoogle Scholar
  85. Mohanty J. N. (2000a) Self and Other: Philosophical Essays. Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  86. Mohanty J. N. (2000b) Gandhi’s Truth. In: Krishna R. (eds). Fusion of Horizons: Socio-Spiritual Heritage of India. Delhi: Allied PublishersGoogle Scholar
  87. Mohanty J. N. (2002) Explorations in Philosophy: Western Philosophy. Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Pani N. (2004) Gandhian Economic Method and the Challenge of Expediency. In: A. K. Giri (eds). Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  89. J. Peacock, “Action Comparison: Efforts Towards A Global and Comparative yet Local and Active Anthropology,” in A. Gingrich and R. Fox, eds., Anthropology, By Comparison. (Routledge, London, 2002), 44–69Google Scholar
  90. P. V. Pillai, “Hind Swaraj in the Light of Heidegger’s Critique of Modernity,” in H. Swaraj, ed., A Fresh Look (Gandhi Peace Foundation, Delhi, 1985)Google Scholar
  91. S. Pollock, “Cosmopolitanisms,” Public Culture (2000) 12(3), 577–589Google Scholar
  92. Quarles van Ufford P., A. K. Giri (eds.) (2003) A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  93. H. G. Ried, and B. Taylor, “Globalization, Democracy and the ‚Aesthetic Ecology of Emergent Publics’ for a Sustainable World: Working From John Dewey,” in A. K. Giri, ed., (2005) “Modern Prince and the Modern Sage: Transforming Power and Freedom”. Asian Journal of Social Theory 33(1) (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  94. Rorty R. (1990) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  95. Radhakrishnan R. (2003) Theory in an Uneven World. Cambridge, MA: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  96. Santos B. de S. (1995) Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  97. A. Sayer, Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. (Routledge, London, 1992 [1984])Google Scholar
  98. C. Schrag, The Self After Postmodernity (Yale U. Press, 1997)Google Scholar
  99. A. Shanks, “What is Truth?” in Towards a Theological Poetics (Routledge, London, 2001)Google Scholar
  100. A. Sen, “History as an Enterprise of Knowledge,” Frontline February 2 (2001) 86–91Google Scholar
  101. Smith A. 1976. A Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  102. Srinivsan A. (1998) The Subject of Fieldwork: Malinowski and Gandhi. In: Meenakshi T. (eds). Anthropological Journeys: Reflections on Fieldwork. Hyderabad: Orient LongmanGoogle Scholar
  103. Strathern M. (1991) Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  104. Strathern M. 1994 Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  105. M. Strathern, “Foreword,” in A. Gingrich and R. Fox, eds., Anthropology, By Comparison (Routledge, London, 2002), xi–xviiGoogle Scholar
  106. Strathern M. (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity. Accountability, and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxon, UK: Sean Kingston Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  107. Strathern M. (ed) (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  108. van Stavern I. 2001 The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perpective. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  109. R. Sunder Rajan, “Notes Towards a Phenomenology of Historiographies,” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Jan-April 187–207Google Scholar
  110. Sunder Rajan R. (1998) Beyond the Crises of European Science: Vol. 1, New Beginnings. Shimla: Institute of Advanced StudiesGoogle Scholar
  111. Tagore R. (1961) On Art and Aesthetics. Calcutta: Orient LongmanGoogle Scholar
  112. Tuner B. S. (ed.) (1996) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  113. Toulmin S. 2001 Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. PressGoogle Scholar
  114. Touraine A. (1977) Self-Production of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  115. Touraine A. (2000) Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  116. Uberoi J. P. S. 1978 Science and Culture. Delhi: Oxford U. PressGoogle Scholar
  117. Uberoi J. P. S. 1984 The Other Mind of Europe: Goethe as a Scientist. Delhi: Oxford U.PressGoogle Scholar
  118. Uberoi J. P. S. (2002) The European Modernity: Truth, Science and Method. New Delhi: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  119. Urry J. (2000) Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  120. Vattimo G. (1999) Belief. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  121. Van Staveren I. (2004) Caring for Economics. In: A. K. Giri (eds). Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  122. Walker R.C. 1998 Contingency. in Craig E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, p 2Google Scholar
  123. Wallerstein I., et␣al. (1996) Open the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  124. Wallerstein I. (1999) The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  125. J. H. Zammito, Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology, Chicago (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Madras Institute of Development StudiesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations