Advertisement

Magnetic Steering of Capsule Endoscopy Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate

  • Yuan-Yuan Luo
  • Jun Pan
  • Yi-Zhi Chen
  • Xi Jiang
  • Wen-Bin Zou
  • Yang-Yang Qian
  • Wei Zhou
  • Xiao Liu
  • Zhao-Shen LiEmail author
  • Zhuan LiaoEmail author
Original Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Capsule endoscopy is currently available as a noninvasive and effective diagnostic modality to identify small bowel abnormalities, with a completion rate to the cecum between 75.1 and 95.6%. A novel magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system could facilitate passage of the capsule through the pylorus, thereby reducing the gastric transit time (GTT).

Objective

We performed this study to determine whether magnetic steering could improve the capsule endoscopy completion rate (CECR) compared to standard protocol.

Methods

Patients referred for MCE in our center from June 2017 to November 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic steering of the capsule through the pylorus was performed after standard gastric examination. CECR, GTT, pyloric transit time (PTT), and rapid gastric transit (GTT ≤ 30 min) rate were compared with a historical control group enrolled from January 2017 to May 2017.

Results

CECR was significantly higher in the intervention group (n = 107) than control group (n = 120) (100% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.02), with a significantly shorter GTT (22.2 vs. 84.5 min, P < 0.001) and PTT (4.4 vs. 56.7 min, P < 0.001). Rapid gastric transit rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (58.9% vs. 15.0%, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the diagnostic yields between the two groups.

Conclusions

Magnetic steering of capsule endoscopy improves small bowel CECR by reducing GTT, adding further support to MCE as a practical tool for noninvasive examination of both the stomach and small bowel.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03482661.

Keywords

Magnetic steering Capsule endoscopy Small bowel Completion rate 

Notes

Author’s contribution

ZL was involved in study concept and design; YYL and JP contributed to registration of the study; YYL, JP, and YZC conducted the study; YYL, XJ, WBZ, YYQ, WZ, and XL contributed to acquisition of data; YYL, JP, and YZC analyzed and interpreted data; JP and YZC drafted the manuscript; YYL contributed to statistical analysis; ZL and ZSL critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; and ZL and JP contributed to the funding. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (to Z. Liao, No. 81422010); Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (to Z. Liao, No. 201271); the Shuguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (to Z. Liao, No. 15SG33); the Chang Jiang Scholars Program of Ministry of Education (to Z. Liao, No. Q2015190); and Shanghai Sailing Program (to J. Pan, No. 18YF1422800), China. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

10620_2019_5479_MOESM1_ESM.tif (15 mb)
The NaviCam magnetic control system. (A) Guidance magnet robot and computer workstation for real-time viewing and controlling; (B) the capsule endoscope (TIFF 15324 kb)
10620_2019_5479_MOESM2_ESM.tif (7.2 mb)
MCE findings of the stomach. (A) Erosive gastritis; (B) gastric polyp; (C) chronic non-atrophic gastritis; and (D) gastric ulcer (TIFF 7415 kb)
10620_2019_5479_MOESM3_ESM.tif (10 mb)
MCE findings of the colon. (A) Colonic polyp; (B) parasites; and (C) colitis (TIFF 10289 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Long-term effects of video capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:196.  https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.03.80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kopylov U, Yung DE, Engel T, et al. Diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy versus magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel contrast ultrasound in the evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis Off J Italian Soc Gastroenterol Italian Assoc Study Liver. 2017;49:854–863.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheung DY, Kim JS, Shim KN, Choi MG, Korean Gut Image Study G. The usefulness of capsule endoscopy for small bowel tumors. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:21–25.  https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47:352–376.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:280–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koulaouzidis A, Giannakou A, Yung DE, Dabos KJ, Plevris JN. Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29:1171–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2013.818532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prichard D, Ou G, Galorport C, Enns R. Sham feeding with bacon does not alter transit time or complete examination rate during small bowel capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:422–428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4901-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ou G, Svarta S, Chan C, Galorport C, Qian H, Enns R. The effect of chewing gum on small-bowel transit time in capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:630–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, et al. Accuracy of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy, compared with conventional gastroscopy, in detection of gastric diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2016;14:1266.e1–1273.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zou WB, Hou XH, Xin L, et al. Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric diseases: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial. Endoscopy. 2015;47:525–528.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, et al. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis Off J Italian Soc Gastroenterol Italian Assoc Study Liver. 2018;50:42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liao Z, Duan XD, Xin L, et al. Feasibility and safety of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy system in examination of human stomach: a pilot study in healthy volunteers. J Intervent Gastroenterol. 2012;2:155–160.  https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ching H-L, Hale M, Sidhu R, McAlindon M. PTH-050 Robot magnet-controlled upper gi capsule endoscopy using the ankon navicam® system: first reported experience outside China. Gut. 2017;66:A230.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314472.447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang X, Qian YY, Liu X, et al. Impact of magnetic steering on gastric transit time of a capsule endoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:746–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnoll-Sussman F. Achieving complete small-bowel capsule endoscopy: is it possible and does it matter? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:109–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niv E, Pinchasovich H, Yanai H. Impact of demographic and clinical parameters on video capsule transit time. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:1161–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girelli CM, Soncini M, Rondonotti E. Implications of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of capsule endoscopy: a multivariable multicenter study of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:697–702.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.697.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim YJ, Lee OY, Jeen YT, et al. Indications for detection, completion, and retention rates of small bowel capsule endoscopy based on the 10-year data from the korean capsule endoscopy registry. Clin Endosc. 2015;48:399–404.  https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials challenging the usefulness of purgative preparation before small-bowel video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-125207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hale MF, Drew K, Sidhu R, McAlindon ME. Does magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy improve small bowel capsule endoscopy completion rate? A randomised controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E215–E221.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1569846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahman I, Afzal NA, Patel P. The role of magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) to aid visualisation in the upper GI tract. Comput Biol Med. 2015;65:359–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.03.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liao Z, Li F, Li ZS. Right lateral position improves complete examination rate of capsule endoscope: a prospective randomized, controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2008;40:483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liao Z, Xu C, Li ZS. Completion rate and diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: 1 vs. 2 frames per second. Endoscopy. 2010;42:360–364.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moroz V, Wilson JS, Kearns P, Wheatley K. Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcomes in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that historically controlled studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment. Trials. 2014;15:481.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-481.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuan-Yuan Luo
    • 1
  • Jun Pan
    • 1
  • Yi-Zhi Chen
    • 1
  • Xi Jiang
    • 1
  • Wen-Bin Zou
    • 1
  • Yang-Yang Qian
    • 1
  • Wei Zhou
    • 1
  • Xiao Liu
    • 1
  • Zhao-Shen Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhuan Liao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai HospitalSecond Military Medical UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations