Advertisement

Purgative Small Bowel Preparation for Capsule Endoscopy? Maybe, but Think Out of the Box!

  • Paraskevas Gkolfakis
  • Georgios Tziatzios
  • Konstantinos TriantafyllouEmail author
Correspondence
  • 19 Downloads

Dear Editor,

American [1] and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [2]—either empirically or based on data about mucosa visualization—advocate the use of 2L of PEG prior to small bowel video capsule endoscopy (VCE), contrary to the device manufacturers’ recommendations. In their review, Cave et al. [3] recommend against the use of purgatives prior to VCE due to lack of adequate data. However, this particular authors’ argument is indeed well supported by the results of the most recently published meta-analysis on this matter [4]. Analysis of data from 12 randomized controlled trials with more than 1220 examinations challenges the usefulness of purgative preparation before small bowel VCE since it increases neither examination’s diagnostic yield [risk ratio 1.17 (0.97–1.40)] nor small bowel mucosa visualization [0.99 (0.95–1.04)] [4].

Agreeing with the authors that preparation before VCE remains an open discussion and that further studies with standardized definitions,...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Enns RA, Hookey L, Armstrong D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spada C, McNamara D, Despott EJ, et al. Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2019;51:574–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cave DR, Hakimian S, Patel K. Current controversies concerning capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05791-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials challenging the usefulness of purgative preparation before small-bowel video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;50:671–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adler SN, Farkash S, Sompolinsky Y, Gafanovich I, Goldin E, Bar-Gil Shitrit A. A novel purgative protocol for capsule endoscopy of the small bowel produces better quality of visibility than 2 l of PEG: timing is of the essence. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Triantafyllou K, Kalli T, Ladas SD. M1107 small bowel purge after the entrance of the capsule in the duodenum results to better quality of bowel preparation for video-capsule endoscopy. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, real time viewer assisted study. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Triantatfyllou K. Negative small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy? May be, but think out-of-the-box!Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adler SN, Farkash S, et al. A novel negative protocol for capsule endoscopy of the small bowel produces better quality of visibility than 2 l of PEG: timing is of the essence. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marya NB, Jawaid S, Foley A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy of early video capsule endoscopy with standard of care in the approach to nonhematemesis GI bleeding (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hookey L, Louw J, Wiepjes M, et al. Lack of benefit of active preparation compared with a clear fluid-only diet in small-bowel visualization for video capsule endoscopy: results of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine – Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens“Attikon” University General HospitalAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity Hospital AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations