Analysis of Accredited Gastroenterology Fellowship Internet-Available Content: Twenty-Nine Steps Toward a Better Program Website
To assess publicly available content derived from official websites of accredited gastroenterology fellowship programs, specifically evaluating data pertinent to prospective applicants.
The Internet provides access to key information for applicants applying to gastroenterology fellowship, particularly as competition drives applicants to apply to a large number of programs. Thus, it is important for fellowship program websites to be up to date and contain accurate and pertinent information.
Twenty-nine variables, determined as important website content on the basis of prior published website analyses and from surveys of preferences, were extracted from the relevant websites of all accredited gastroenterology fellowships in the USA. Results were binary—i.e., a website either contained or did not contain each item.
A total of 178 websites were evaluated. The mean number of online content items was 14.1(± 3.2 SD) out of a possible 29 (47.1%). Program coordinator contact information, application information, and the number of current fellows were accessible on > 80% of websites. In contrast, the typical number and types of procedures performed by fellows and number of hospitals covered by fellows on call were found on < 10% of websites. Analysis revealed that 23.2% of lifestyle, 48.3% of training, and 59.6% of program variables were met.
Gastroenterology fellowship websites lacked important content. Websites had a lower mean percentage of lifestyle content compared to training and program-related items. An organized website containing relevant information may not only attract qualified applicants but also avert unnecessary email inquiries and inappropriate applications. This study may provide guidance to gastroenterology fellowship programs seeking to improve their websites for applicants.
KeywordsGastroenterology Fellowship Website Content Comprehensiveness
Applying for gastroenterology fellowship is competitive; in 2018, 759 applicants applied and 489 matched, yielding a 64.4% match rate . Applicants usually apply for gastroenterology fellowship approximately 1 year prior to the position start date through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) . Due to the intense competition, applicants often apply to a large number of programs, many with which they are unfamiliar. Since the Internet is an essential source of information for applicants, it is important for fellowship program websites to be up to date, containing accurate and pertinent information [3, 4, 5].
While there have been prior studies of other residency and fellowship programs that have evaluated program-specific websites, none to date have examined gastroenterology fellowship websites. The purpose of this study was to assess gastroenterology fellowship program online content, specifically evaluating those variables that would be pertinent to prospective applicants.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-nine online content items assessed, divided into training, program, and lifestyle categories
Online content variables
Away rotation information
Teaching opportunities for fellows
Typical number and types of procedures performed by fellows
Duration and types of rotations
Whether liver transplants are performed at the institution
Faculty members listing
Whether or not advanced endoscopic procedures are performed in training
Whether training is by hospital-employed and/or private practice physicians
Number of positions available
Program coordinator contact
Current fellow listing
Program director contact
Fourth year advanced training
Recent board pass rates
Synopsis/general description of the fellowship
Number of current fellows
Academic stipend for books, travel, research
Call roster for first years
Salary and benefits
Formal conference hours
Social events for trainees/social events open to the community
Number of hospitals covered on call
Typical call frequency/schedule of fellows
A total of 178 publicly accessible gastroenterology fellowship websites were evaluated. Programs had a mean of 3.0 ± 1.3 gastroenterology fellowship positions available per year (median = 3) and a mean 9.0 ± 4.4 (median = 9) total fellows per institution. There were 93 large programs (52.2%) with ≥ 9 fellows enrolled across years. The greatest number of programs were found in the Northeast US Census region (67 programs), compared to the fewest in the West (26 programs). Fifty-four programs (30.3%) indicated availability of a 4th year of advanced gastroenterology training.
Comparison of Online Content
Large programs listed a significantly greater number of online details compared to small programs (mean 14.3 ± 3.4 vs. 12.1 ± 4.6 out of 29 items; p = 0.001). Programs with optional 4th year advanced gastroenterology training contained significantly more online criteria, with a mean of 15.2 ± 3.0 (52.6%) variables present, compared to 12.4 ± 4.3 (42.6%) of programs without 4th year advanced training (p < 0.001).
Applicants to any specialty use the Internet extensively for program-specific information when applying for residency or fellowship training [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13]. In assessing the utility of residency and fellowship websites, several surveys of applicants have emphasized the incompleteness of pertinent information, especially concerning schedules, post-residency placement, and employment benefits [3, 4, 14]. In this study, although many websites contained information regarding hospital affiliation(s), faculty listings, program coordinator contact information, application requirements, and the total number of then-current fellows, many of the gastroenterology websites reviewed were frequently lacking in other important aspects. For example, information regarding the nature and volume of didactic teaching, typical numbers and types of procedures performed by fellows, the number of hospitals covered by the on-call fellow, the names and contact information of current fellows, the board pass rates of recently graduated fellows, and details of post-fellowship placement were rarely included.
Interestingly, large programs were associated with a significantly greater number of online criteria met per program compared to small programs, possibly due to funding and personnel availability in larger programs enabling routine website maintenance. Moreover, gastroenterology programs had a significantly lower mean percentage of lifestyle content items present compared to training and program items, possibly due to a perceived lack of importance or an unwillingness to display such information.
Previous studies surveying residency applicants found that content included in a program website rather than its aesthetic qualities is of greater importance to applicants . When assessing how integral websites are to applicant decision making, Chu et al. found that anesthesia residency applicants rely heavily on anesthesia program websites in order to evaluate relative program merit, prepare for interviews, and eventually formulate a rank list . This was similarly noted with other specialties including emergency medicine, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, microsurgery, and general surgery [5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13].
Limitations to this study included subjectivity in selecting items to evaluate. Many of the 29 variables were based on prior studies of other fields [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12], as well as surveys identifying which information is most valued by applicants [4, 14]. The variables were chosen by the authors, which included medical students, a gastroenterology fellow, and a gastroenterology attending/program director. Inclusion of a resident author, particularly one applying to gastroenterology fellowship, may have altered certain variables. Furthermore, some newly accredited programs did not have available websites and could not be included in this study. Finally, data collection occurred over several months, during which time websites may have been updated.
Gastroenterology fellowship program websites are a source of important information, providing a valuable resource for residents applying to gastroenterology fellowship. Given the Internet’s omnipresence, programs may benefit from reviewing their websites through the eyes of applicants. Many gastroenterology program websites do not provide information that applicants may deem as essential. An organized website containing relevant information may not only attract applicants but also prevent unnecessary email inquiries and inappropriate applications. While inclusion of all 29 variables is not meant to be presented as a standard, this article may provide guidance to individual gastroenterology fellowship programs on specific areas on their websites that could be improved.
JHR contributed to study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; statistical analysis. AEME contributed to study concept and design; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; study supervision. MB contributed to study concept and design; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; study supervision. AML contributed to acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. SFM contributed to study concept and design; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; study supervision.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.Program TNRM. Results and Data: Specialties Matching Service 2018 Appointment Year 2018. https://mk0nrmpcikgb8jxyd19h.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Results-and-Data-SMS-2018.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
- 2.(AAMC) AoAMC. ERAS 2019 Fellowship Application Timeline 2018. https://students-residents.aamc.org/training-residency-fellowship/article/eras-fellowship-timeline/. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
- 12.Ruddell JH, Hartley-Blossom ZJ, Bajaj AI, Grand D, Eltorai AEM. Analysis of abdominal radiology fellowship website content and comprehensiveness. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1861-0.