Advertisement

Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does the Place Where Ultrasound Is Performed Impact Its Effectiveness?

  • Federico Piñero
  • Fernando Rubinstein
  • Sebastián Marciano
  • Nora Fernández
  • Jorge Silva
  • Yanina Zambelo
  • Margarita Anders
  • Alina Zerega
  • Ezequiel Ridruejo
  • Carlos Miguez
  • Beatriz Ameigeiras
  • Claudia D’Amico
  • Luis Gaite
  • Carla Bermúdez
  • Carlos Rosales
  • Gustavo Romero
  • Lucas McCormack
  • Virginia Reggiardo
  • Luis Colombato
  • Adrián Gadano
  • Marcelo Silva
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Biannual ultrasound (US) is recommended as the clinical screening tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The effectiveness of surveillance according to the place where US is performed has not been previously reported.

Aims

To compare the effectiveness of US performed in the center responsible for follow-up as opposed to US proceeding from centers other than that of follow-up.

Methods

This is a multicenter cohort study from Argentina. The last US was categorized as done in the same center or done in a different center from the institution of the patient’s follow-up. Surveillance failure was defined as HCC diagnosis not meeting Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages 0-A or when no nodules were observed at HCC diagnosis.

Results

From 533 patients with HCC, 62.4% were under routine surveillance with a surveillance failure of 38.8%. After adjusting for a propensity score matching, BCLC stage and lead-time survival bias, surveillance was associated with a significant survival benefit [HR of 0.51 (CI 0.38; 0.69)]. Among patients under routine surveillance (n = 345), last US was performed in the same center in 51.6% and in a different center in 48.4%. Similar rates of surveillance failure were observed between US done in the same or in a different center (32% vs. 26.3%; P = 0.25). Survival was not significantly different between both surveillance modalities [HR 0.79 (CI 0.53; 1.20)].

Conclusions

Routine surveillance for HCC in the daily practice improved survival either when performed in the same center or in a different center from that of patient’s follow-up.

Keywords

Carcinoma hepatocellular Surveillance Survival Risk adjustment 

Abbreviations

AFP

Alpha-fetoprotein

BSC

Best supportive care

CI

Confidence interval

CT

Computerized tomography

ECOG

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HR

Hazard ratio

IQR

Interquartile range

LT

Liver transplantation

LR

Liver resection

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NAFL

Nonalcoholic fatty liver

PEI

Percutaneous ethanol injection

RFA

Radiofrequency ablation

TACE

Transarterial chemoembolization

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Latin American Liver Research, Education and Awareness Network (LALREAN) for the support of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Supplementary material

10620_2018_5390_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (3 mb)
Supplementary Figure 1. Receiving Operator Curve from the final logistic regression model assessing probability of surveillance (TIFF 3072 kb)
10620_2018_5390_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (3 mb)
Supplementary Figure 2. Proportional hazard assumption and observed versus predicted curves from an adjusted survival model regarding surveillance (TIFF 3072 kb)
10620_2018_5390_MOESM3_ESM.tiff (3 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 3072 kb)
10620_2018_5390_MOESM4_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sherman M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, surveillance, and diagnosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:003–016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heimbach J, Kulik LM, Finn R, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Méndez-Sánchez N, Ridruejo E. Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (LAASL) clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol. 2014;13:1–37.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang B-H, Yang B-H, Tang Z-Y. Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:417–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen J-G, Parkin DM, Chen Q-G, et al. Screening for liver cancer: results of a randomised controlled trial in Qidong, China. J Med Screen. 2003;10:204–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singal A, Volk ML, Waljee A, et al. Meta-analysis: surveillance with ultrasound for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:37–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duvoux C, Thoraval FR, Decaens T, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria. Gatroenterology. 2012;143:986–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piñero F, Tisi Baña M, de Ataide EC, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of the AFP model in a multicenter cohort from Latin America. Liver Int. 2016;36:1657–1667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391:1301–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singal AG, Nehra M, Adams-Huet B, et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at advanced stages among patients in the HALT-C trial: where did surveillance fail? Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:425–432.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Wallis M, et al. Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:98–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fassio E, Díaz S, Santa C, et al. Etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: a prospective, multicenter, international study. Ann Hepatol. 2010;9:63–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piñero F, Marciano S, Anders M, et al. Screening for liver cancer during transplant waiting list. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:355–360.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Debes JD, Chan AJ, Balderramo D, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in South America: evaluation of risk factors, demographics and therapy. Liver Int. 2018;38:136–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sherman M. Screening for liver cancer: another piece of the puzzle? Hepatology. 2014;59:1673–1675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trinchet J-C, Chaffaut C, Bourcier V, et al. Ultrasonographic surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a randomized trial comparing 3- and 6-month periodicities. Hepatology. 2011;54:1987–1997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santi V, Trevisani F, Gramenzi A, et al. Semiannual surveillance is superior to annual surveillance for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma and patient survival. J Hepatol. 2010;53:291–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singal AG, Tiro JA, Marrero JA, et al. Mailed outreach program increases ultrasound screening of patients with cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;2016:1–37.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cucchetti A, Trevisani F, Bucci L, et al. Years of life that could be saved from prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:814–824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong C, Garcia RT, Trinh HN, et al. Adherence to screening for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B in a community setting. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2712–2721.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-1015-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davila JA, Morgan RO, Richardson PA, Du XL, McGlynn KA, El-Serag HB. Use of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis in the United States. Hepatology. 2010;52:132–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singal AG, Tiro J, Li X, Adams-Huet B, Chubak J. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among patients with cirrhosis in a population-based integrated health care delivery system. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:650–655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sherman M, Peltekian KM, Lee C. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus: incidence and prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma in a North American urban population. Hepatology. 1995;22:432–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Costentin CE, Layese R, Bourcier V, et al. Compliance with hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance guidelines associated with increased lead-time adjusted survival of patients with compensated viral cirrhosis: a multi-center cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:431–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang B, Yang B. Combined alpha fetoprotein testing and ultrasonography as a screening test for primary liver cancer. J Med Screen. 1999;6:108–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zoli M, Magalotti D, Bianchi G, Gueli C, Marchesini G, Pisi E. Efficacy of a surveillance program for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;78:977–985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bolondi L, Sofia S, Siringo S, et al. Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis. Gut. 2001;48:251–259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rapaccini G, et al. Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patient survival (Italian experience). Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:734–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Meer S, de Man RA, Coenraad MJ, et al. Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with increased survival: results from a large cohort in the Netherlands. J Hepatol. 2015;63:1156–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson P, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, et al. Impact of disease stage and aetiology on survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for surveillance. Br J Cancer. 2017;116:441–447.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim HY, Lee JH, Lee HA, et al. Intensity of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma determines survival in patients at risk in a hepatitis B-endemic area. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:1490–1501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, et al. Impact of hepatocellular carcinoma etiology and liver function on the benefit of surveillance: a novel approach for the adjustment of lead-time bias. Liver Int. 2018. (Epub ahead of print).  https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cucchetti A, Trevisani F, Cescon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of semi-annual surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients of the Italian Liver Cancer population. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1089–1096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davila JA, Henderson L, Kramer JR, et al. Utilization of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among hepatitis C virus-infected veterans in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:85–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim SY, An J, Lim Y-S, et al. MRI with liver-specific contrast for surveillance of patients with cirrhosis at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Piñero
    • 1
    • 11
    • 12
  • Fernando Rubinstein
    • 15
  • Sebastián Marciano
    • 2
  • Nora Fernández
    • 5
  • Jorge Silva
    • 10
  • Yanina Zambelo
    • 8
  • Margarita Anders
    • 4
  • Alina Zerega
    • 9
  • Ezequiel Ridruejo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carlos Miguez
    • 6
  • Beatriz Ameigeiras
    • 14
  • Claudia D’Amico
    • 13
  • Luis Gaite
    • 7
  • Carla Bermúdez
    • 2
  • Carlos Rosales
    • 10
  • Gustavo Romero
    • 6
  • Lucas McCormack
    • 4
  • Virginia Reggiardo
    • 8
  • Luis Colombato
    • 5
  • Adrián Gadano
    • 2
  • Marcelo Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario AustralUniversidad AustralPilarArgentina
  2. 2.Sección Hepatología, Departamento de InvestigaciónHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (CEMIC)Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Hospital Alemán de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  5. 5.Hospital Británico de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  6. 6.Hospital UdaondoBuenos AiresArgentina
  7. 7.Clínica de Nefrología de Santa FeSanta FeArgentina
  8. 8.Hospital del CentenarioRosarioArgentina
  9. 9.Hospital Privado de CórdobaCórdobaArgentina
  10. 10.Hospital G RawsonSan JuanArgentina
  11. 11.Sanatorio Trinidad San IsidroBuenos AiresArgentina
  12. 12.Clínica Privada San FernandoBuenos AiresArgentina
  13. 13.Centro Especialidades Medicas Ambulatorias (CEMA)Mar del PlataArgentina
  14. 14.Hospital Ramos MejíaCiudad de Buenos AiresArgentina
  15. 15.Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS)Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations