Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 391–400 | Cite as

Poor Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Guidelines in a National Cohort of Digestive Disease Specialists

  • Rushad Patell
  • Abhishek Karwa
  • Rocio Lopez
  • Carol A. BurkeEmail author
Original Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is cost-effective and prevents death from CRC if used appropriately. Physicians do not recommend CRC screening according to guidelines. Physician-related factors associated with CRC screening knowledge are unknown.

Aims

We tested the accuracy of CRC screening knowledge in a nationwide cohort of practicing and trainee physicians and assessed respondent’s interest in a mobile app to improve appropriate CRC screening use.

Methods

An electronic survey was emailed to practicing gastroenterology professionals and medical and surgical trainees. We assessed accuracy of responses compared to CRC screening and surveillance guidelines. We assessed factors associated with higher accuracy of knowledge, frequency of workplace smartphone use, and interest in a smartphone app to aid CRC screening and surveillance recommendations.

Results

In total, 1432 responses were received. Hundred percent accuracy was noted in 22% of respondents for screening and 37% for surveillance. Factors associated with higher accuracy of screening guidelines included more recent training completion; academic practice; performing 21–100 colonoscopies per month (vs. < 21 or > 100). Higher accuracy of surveillance guidelines was associated with more recent training completion; academic practice; being a third-year fellow. In total, 53% use smartphones at least “often” in patient care. In total, 87% would use a CRC screening and surveillance smartphone app.

Conclusions

Accuracy in applying CRC screening guidelines by gastroenterologists is poor. Smartphone use for patient care is prevalent. Our data show a high interest in a CRC screening/surveillance mobile app. Mobile tools appear an opportunity for rapid access and an increased adherence to CRC screening guidelines.

Keywords

Colorectal neoplasm Guideline Gastroenterologists Preventive medicine 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Force USPST. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, et al. Are physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent? J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Heijningen EB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Steyerberg EW, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: a large, community-based study. Gut. 2015;64:1584–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3135–3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102:22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carethers JM. Current and future role of the gastroenterologist in GI cancer management. J Dig Cancer Rep. 2013;1:78–81.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dominic OG, McGarrity T, Dignan M, Lengerich EJ. American College of gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2626–2627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieberman DA, De Garmo PL, Fleischer DE, Eisen GM, Helfand M. Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Audibert C, Perlaky A, Glass D. Global perspective on colonoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening: a multi-country survey of practicing colonoscopists. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017;7:116–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of colorectal cancer screening practices. Am J Med. 2003;115:129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patel N, Tong L, Ahn C, Singal AG, Gupta S. Post-polypectomy guideline adherence: importance of belief in guidelines, not guideline knowledge or fear of missed cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2937–2945.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iskandar H, Yan Y, Elwing J, Early D, Colditz GA, Wang JS. Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971–978.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3403-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L, Schoenfeld P. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:554–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nilsen W, Kumar S, Shar A, et al. Advancing the science of mHealth. J Health Commun. 2012;17:5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, de la Torre DiezI, Lopez-Coronado M, Saleem K. Mobile-health: a review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform. 2015;56:265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mobile Health. A technology road map. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Montano DE, Phillips WR. Cancer screening by primary care physicians: a comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rushad Patell
    • 1
  • Abhishek Karwa
    • 2
  • Rocio Lopez
    • 3
  • Carol A. Burke
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Hematology OncologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Populations Health ResearchCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations