Comparison of Point-of-Care and Classical Immunoassays for the Monitoring Infliximab and Antibodies Against Infliximab in IBD
- 263 Downloads
The primary objective is to assess whether the POC assays to measure infliximab residual trough level in the serum of IBD patients were non-inferior to the ELISA techniques available on the market, and to determine which of them was the most robust. The second is to compare three different ELISA kits for monitoring anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI).
The assays were carried out on patients’ sera using four ELISA kits from four different suppliers (three with a monoclonal antibody and one polyclonal) and two rapid techniques provided by BÜHLMANN (Quantum Blue®) and R-Biopharm (Ridaquick) for monitoring infliximab levels. ATI were measured by three ELISA sets (Grifols, Theradiag, and R-Biopharm) which have different positivity limits and different units.
We measured infliximab residual level and ATI in the serum of 90 IBD patients (85 treated with infliximab and five with adalimumab). All of the infliximab assays were very well correlated when analyzed with Spearman nonparametric correlation (0.93 ≤ r ≤ 0.99), and the two POC assays were also excellently correlated (r = 0.98). The ATI monitoring kits revealed a correlation ranging from 0.73 to 0.96 when comparing positive and negative patients. When normalizing the quantitative values between the different ELISA tests (expressed arbitrarily by using multiples of the positivity limits defined by each supplier), the Spearman r coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.93.
The available evidence allows us to conclude that all of the infliximab monitoring assays correlate well and may be used for IFX monitoring; albeit variations in measured IFX concentration among different assays remain present, these assays could be interchangeable. The ATI monitoring techniques are all capable of detecting ATI-positive patients, but because of the difference in the positivity limits and the measurement units, it is better to follow a patient rate with one definite kit.
KeywordsIBD Pharmacokinetic IFX Monitoring POC
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Steenholdt C, et al. Changes in serum trough levels of infliximab during treatment intensification but not in anti-infliximab antibody detection are associated with clinical outcomes after therapeutic failure in Crohn’s disease. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2015;9:238–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kelly OB, Donnell SO, Stempak JM, Steinhart AH, Silverberg MS. Therapeutic drug monitoring to guide infliximab dose adjustment is associated with better endoscopic outcomes than clinical decision making alone in active inflammatory bowel disease. Inflam Bowel Dis. 2017;23:1202–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Papamichael K, et al. Improved long-term outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving proactive compared with reactive monitoring of serum concentrations of infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.031.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Freeman K, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of use of therapeutic monitoring of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors [LISA-TRACKER® enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, TNF-α-Blocker ELISA kits and Grifols® ELISA kits] versus standard care in patients with Crohn’s disease: systematic reviews and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Stappen V, et al. An optimized anti-infliximab bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for harmonization of anti-infliximab antibody titers in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. IBD. 2015;9:2172–2177.Google Scholar
- 32.Gils A, et al. Harmonization of infliximab and anti-infliximab assays facilitates the comparison between originators and biosimilars in clinical samples. IBD. 2016;22:969–975.Google Scholar