Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 823–825 | Cite as

Psychological Comorbidity and Chronic Heartburn: Which Is the Chicken and Which Is the Egg?

  • Ronnie Fass
  • Shira S. Fass

During the last two decades, it has been recognized that patients reporting heartburn may not necessarily have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the underlying cause of their symptoms [1]. Heartburn does not appear to be stimulus-specific, since numerous stimuli may provoke this symptom [2]. For example, either mechanical (intra-esophageal balloon distension) or chemical (mucosal acidification) can cause heartburn [3]. This scientific breakthrough enabled research groups to identify new disorders in which heartburn was the predominant symptom, such as functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity, which are not GERD-related but instead are included in the category of functional esophageal disorders [4]. Importantly, within the GERD group, there are 3 phenotypic presentations, all with heartburn as the predominant symptom: nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus [5]. Thus, there are currently 5 accepted disorders (3 GERD-related and 2 functional esophageal disorders) in which heartburn is the principal symptom.

Several studies have demonstrated that patients carrying a psychiatric diagnosis are more likely to report heartburn, exercise-induced heartburn, and dysphagia as compared with those who are without psychiatric disorder [6]. Additionally, 42% of psychiatric patients compared with 5% of normal controls reported gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms [7]. Furthermore, according to several studies of psychological comorbidities in GERD patients, anxiety, depression, and somatization are significantly more common as compared with normal controls [8, 9]. There is evidence that increased severity of GERD, as determined by frequency and duration of symptoms, is more likely to be associated with psychological distress [10]. Interestingly, no relationship has been established between psychological comorbidity and pH testing or mucosal pathology; furthermore, the presence or absence of psychological comorbidity is not predictive of any of the GERD phenotypes [10, 11, 12].

In this issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Bilgi et al. [13] assessed the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with heartburn. While the authors considered erosive esophagitis, nonerosive reflux disease, hypersensitive esophagus, and functional heartburn as different GERD phenotypes, as mentioned above, the two former are GERD subgroups and the latter two are not related to GERD but rather to functional esophageal disorders. Moreover, the authors used the term “hypersensitive esophagus,” which was changed to “reflux hypersensitivity” according to the Rome IV criteria [4].

The impetus behind this research project is the paucity of systematic evaluations of psychological comorbidity in patients with heartburn, including GERD and nonGERD groups. Stratification of patients with heartburn to the different groups was carried out using a battery of tests, including upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, impedance + pH, and a GERD questionnaire. Subsequently, psychological comorbidity was determined using several evaluation tools including a structured clinical interview according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV, the somatosensory amplification scale, the Beck depression inventory, and the state-trait anxiety inventory. The short form 36 (SF 36) was used to assess the reported general health-related quality-of-life. The authors demonstrated that depression was significantly more common in all heartburn groups whether GERD-related or functional, as compared with healthy controls. When the prevalence of psychological comorbidity was compared among the different patient groups, major depression was significantly more common in the functional heartburn patients and anxiety in the hypersensitive esophagus and erosive esophagitis groups.

The study confirmed the findings of previous trials that depression and anxiety are common in patients with GERD and those with functional esophageal disorders. Interestingly, anxiety was specifically more common in those with erosive esophagitis and the hypersensitive esophagus. It is possible that the small number of participants in each group of patients may have skewed the results of the anxiety assessment. The study should serve as the impetus of a much larger trial, with hundreds of patients in each group.

The study, though well designed, leaves several unanswered questions that whether addressed would have increased the understanding of the nature of the relationship between heartburn and psychological comorbidity. Importantly, it still remains to be elucidated which factor is causative. Several studies have demonstrated that patients exposed to prolonged life stressors are more likely to complain of symptoms of GERD [14]. Vital exhaustion, a measure of sustained stress, is the most common parameter that correlates with heartburn [15]. Furthermore, prolonged stress can lead to hypervigilance and thus the over-reporting of symptoms [16]. Acute stress can exacerbate heartburn symptoms by enhancing perceptive responses to intra-esophageal acid [15]. Thus, it appears from the aforementioned studies that psychological comorbidity is a central factor that can modulate perception of intra-esophageal stimuli, increasing complaints of symptoms such as heartburn in these patients [17].

More important is the question about the impact of psychological comorbidity on the response of GERD patients to anti-reflux treatment. While the data are limited, several studies have suggested that the presence of psychological comorbidity adversely affects the response of patients to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. High levels of anxiety and depression reduce the likelihood of achieving complete heartburn relief [18, 19]. Moreover, the level of psychological distress is an independent predictor for poor response to PPI treatment [20].

In summary, psychological comorbidity is common among heartburn patients, either those with GERD or patients with functional esophageal disorders. More importantly, psychological comorbidity profoundly affects disease presentation, by altering the perception of disease severity. The presence of psychological comorbidity reduces the likelihood of achieving complete heartburn resolution while being treated for reflux. All data suggest the need to identify the presence of psychological comorbidity in patients with heartburn symptoms. Timely psychological intervention concomitant with pharmacologic anti-reflux treatment in GERD patients and neuromodulators in those with functional esophageal disorders carry the highest probability of achieving therapeutic success.


  1. 1.
    Fass R. Functional heartburn: what it is and how to treat it. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;19:23–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fass R, Naliboff B, Higa L, et al. Differential effect of long-term esophageal acid exposure on mechanosensitivity and chemosensitivity in humans. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:1363–1373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:29–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aziz Q, Fass R, Gyawali CP, Miwa H, Pandolfino JE, Zerbib F. Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;5085:00178-5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fass R, Ofman JJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease—should we adopt a new conceptual framework? Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1901–1909.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avidan B, Sonneberg A, Giblovich H, Sontag SJ. Reflux symptoms are associated with psychiatric disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:1907–1912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ III. Gastrointestinal tract symptoms and self-reported abuse: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1040–1049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu WH, Wong WM, Lam CL, et al. Anxiety but not depression determines health care seeking behavior in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:2081–2088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong WM, Lai KC, Lam KF, et al. Prevalence, clinical spectrum and health care utilization of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a Chinese population: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:595–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee YC, Wang HP, Chiu HM, et al. Comparative analysis between psychological and endoscopic profiles in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study based on screening endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:798–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Núňez-Rodriguez MH, Miranda SA. psychological factors in gastroesophageal reflux disease measured by SCL-90-R questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:3071–3075. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0276-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovács Z, Kerékgyártó O. Psychological factors, quality of life, and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disorder. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2007;37:139–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bilgi M, Vardar R, Yildirim E, Veznedaroğlu B, Bor S. Prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux subgroups. Dig Dis Sci. (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4273-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mizyed I, Fass SS, Fass R. Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and psychological comorbidity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;29:351–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naliboff BD, Mayer M, Fass R, et al. The effect of life stress on symptoms of heartburn. Psychol Med. 2004;66:426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayer EA. The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal disease. Gut. 2000;47:861–869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fass R, Tougas G. Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain. Gut. 2002;51:885–892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiklund I, Carlsson R, Carlsson J, Glise H. Psychological factors as a predictor of treatment response in patients with heartburn: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:288–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubenstein JH, Nojkov B, Korsnes S, et al. Oesophageal hypersensitivity is associated with features of psychiatric disorders and irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:443–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nojkov B, Rubenstein JH, Adlis SA, et al. The influence of co-morbid IBS and psychological distress on outcomes and quality of life following PPI therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:473–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Esophageal and Swallowing Center, MetroHealth Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, MetroHealth Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations