Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp 1272–1276 | Cite as

Diagnostic Yield of Isolated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody Elevation for Celiac Disease

  • Nicholas A. Hoerter
  • Sarah E. Shannahan
  • Jorge Suarez
  • Suzanne K. Lewis
  • Peter H. R. Green
  • Daniel A. Leffler
  • Benjamin Lebwohl
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Serologic testing for celiac disease includes tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies. In addition to these tools, assays for deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies have been shown to have sensitivity and specificity that are comparable to tissue transglutaminase testing, and are increasingly being used for celiac disease testing.

Aims

The goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) testing in the setting of a negative tissue transglutaminase (TTG) IgA test.

Methods

We reviewed the records of all patients seen at two U.S. celiac disease referral centers and identified those who had an elevated DGP IgA and/or IgG in the setting of a negative TTG IgA. Of these patients, those who underwent duodenal biopsy while on a gluten-containing diet were included. Patients with prior biopsy-proven celiac disease or prior TTG IgA positivity were excluded. The results of the biopsy were used as the gold standard for celiac disease diagnosis, and patients with villous atrophy (Marsh class 3) on duodenal biopsy were considered to have celiac disease.

Results

Between the two institutions, 84 patients were identified with negative TTG IgA and positive DGP IgA or IgG who also had duodenal biopsies performed while maintaining a gluten-containing diet. Of these patients, 13 patients (15.5%; 95% CI 8.5–25.0%) were found to have celiac disease on duodenal biopsy.

Conclusions

DGP antibody testing can identify cases of celiac disease in TTG-negative individuals, although the low positive predictive value suggests that the yield may be low.

Keywords

Celiac disease Gliadin Tissue transglutaminase Serologic tests 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and nothing to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology. 1992;102:330–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prince HE. Evaluation of the INOVA diagnostics enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for measuring serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA to deamidated gliadin peptides. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13:150–151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sugai E, Vazquez H, Nachman F, Moreno ML, et al. Accuracy of testing for antibodies to synthetic gliadin-related peptides in celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1112–1117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oyaert M, Vermeersch P, De Hertogh G, Hiele M, et al. Combining antibody tests and taking into account antibody levels improves serologic diagnosis of celiac disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1537–1546.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vermeersch P, Geboes K, Marien G, Hoffman I, Hiele M, Bossuyt X. Serological diagnosis of celiac disease: comparative analysis of different strategies. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1761–1767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugai E, Hwang HJ, Vazquez H, Smecuol E, et al. New serology assays can detect gluten sensitivity among enteropathy patients seronegative for anti-tissue transglutaminase. Clin Chem. 2010;56:661–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niveloni S, Sugai E, Cabanne A, Vazquez H, et al. Antibodies against synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides as predictors of celiac disease: prospective assessment in an adult population with a high pretest probability of disease. Clin Chem. 2007;53:2186–2192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Volta U, Granito A, Parisi C, Fabbri A, et al. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies as a routine test for celiac disease: a prospective analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:186–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naiyer AJ, Hernandez L, Ciaccio EJ, Papadakis K, et al. Comparison of commercially available serologic kits for the detection of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:225–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis NR, Scott BB. Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody compared as screening tests for coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:73–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakly W, Mankai A, Ghdess A, Achour A, Thabet Y, Ghedira I. Performance of anti-deamidated gliadin peptides antibodies in celiac disease diagnosis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36:598–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schyum AC, Rumessen JJ. Serological testing for celiac disease in adults. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2013;1:319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugai E, Moreno ML, Hwang HJ, Cabanne A, et al. Celiac disease serology in patients with different pretest probabilities: is biopsy avoidable? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3144–3152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abrams JA, Brar P, Diamond B, Rotterdam H, Green PH. Utility in clinical practice of immunoglobulin a anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody for the diagnosis of celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:726–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barada K, Habib RH, Malli A, Hashash JG, et al. Prediction of celiac disease at endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2014;46:110–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kurppa K, Lindfors K, Collin P, Saavalainen P, et al. Antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides in early-stage celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:673–678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vermeersch P, Richter T, Hauer AC, Stern M, et al. Use of likelihood ratios improves clinical interpretation of IgG and IgA anti-DGP antibody testing for celiac disease in adults and children. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:248–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang N, Truedsson L, Elvin K, Andersson BA, et al. Serological assessment for celiac disease in IgA deficient adults. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas A. Hoerter
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Shannahan
    • 2
  • Jorge Suarez
    • 1
  • Suzanne K. Lewis
    • 1
  • Peter H. R. Green
    • 1
  • Daniel A. Leffler
    • 2
  • Benjamin Lebwohl
    • 1
  1. 1.The Celiac Disease Center at Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Celiac Disease CenterBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations