Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 984–993 | Cite as

Prevalence of Psychiatric Comorbidity in Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Subgroups

  • Mustafa Melih BilgiEmail author
  • Rukiye Vardar
  • Esra Yıldırım
  • Baybars Veznedaroğlu
  • Serhat Bor
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Limited data exist regarding the psychosocial aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some GERD subgroups, such as functional heartburn and hypersensitive esophagus, might show different psychiatric comorbidities than others.

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the psychiatric comorbidities of GERD subgroups using a cross-sectional design.

Methods

A group of GERD patients at a tertiary outpatient clinic were evaluated via upper GIS (gastrointestinal system) endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h impedance–pH monitoring. Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with erosive reflux disease, 44 with non-erosive reflux disease, 20 with functional heartburn, 11 with hypersensitive esophagus, and 44 healthy controls participated. Psychiatric diagnoses were made using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV. Psychometric measurements of the patients were performed using the Somatosensory Amplification Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Short-Form 36. Healthy controls were evaluated with the same psychometric scales except for the Short-Form 36.

Results

All of the GERD subgroups were significantly more depressed than the control group. Depressive disorders were significantly more prevalent in the functional heartburn group than in the non-erosive reflux disease and erosive reflux disease groups. The trait anxiety level of the functional heartburn group was significantly higher than those of the control and non-erosive reflux disease groups. The quality of life scores of the GERD subgroups were significantly lower than the population standards.

Conclusions

Depressive disorders were frequently comorbid in the GERD subgroups studied (30–65 %). It is essential to consider the high prevalence rates of comorbid depression when managing GERD.

Keywords

Gastroesophageal reflux disease Functional gastrointestinal disorders Comorbidity Psychology 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Bor S, Mandiracioglu A, Kitapcioglu G, Caymaz-Bor C, Gilbert RJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in a low-income region in Turkey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:759–765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bor S, Lazebnik LB, Kitapcioglu G, Manannikof I, Vasiliev Y. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Moscow. Dis Esophagus. 2015;29:159–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): risk factors, and impact on quality of life-a population-based study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:111–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boltin D, Boaz M, Aizic S, et al. Psychological distress is not associated with treatment failure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75:462–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granderath FA, Kamolz T. Pointner R Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Principles of Disease, Diagnosis, and Treatment. New York: Springer; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wright CE, Ebrecht M, Mitchell R, Anggiansah A, Weinman J. The effect of psychological stress on symptom severity and perception in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux. J Psychosom Res. 2005;59:415–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Naliboff BD, Mayer M, Fass R, et al. The effect of life stress on symptoms of heartburn. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:426–434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jansson C, Nordenstedt H, Wallander MA, et al. Severe gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in relation to anxiety, depression and coping in a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:683–691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nunez-Rodriguez MH, Miranda Sivelo A. Psychological factors in gastroesophageal reflux disease measured by scl-90-R questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:3071–3075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oh JH, Kim TS, Choi MG, et al. Relationship between psychological factors and quality of life in subtypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut Liver. 2009;3:259–265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rey E, Garcia-Alonso M, Moreno-Ortega M, Almansa C, Alvarez-Sanchez A, Diaz-Rubio M. Influence of psychological distress on characteristics of symptoms in patients with GERD: the role of IBS comorbidity. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:321–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnston B, Lewis S, Collins J, McFarland R, Love A. Acid perception in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is dependent on psychosocial factors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30:1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shapiro M, Green C, Bautista JM, et al. Functional heartburn patients demonstrate traits of functional bowel disorder but lack a uniform increase of chemoreceptor sensitivity to acid. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1084–1091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu JC, Cheung CM, Wong VW, Sung JJ. Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:690–695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tack J. Is there a unifying role for visceral hypersensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome in non-erosive reflux disease? Digestion. 2008;78:42–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modlin IM, Hunt RH, Malfertheiner P, et al. Non-erosive reflux disease–defining the entity and delineating the management. Digestion. 2008;78:1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    First MBSR, Gibbon M, et al. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I). Clinical Version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozkurkcugil A, Aydemir O, Yildiz M, EsenDanaci A, Koroglu E. Adaptation to Turkish and reliability study of Structured Clinical Interview for Axial I disorders. Ilac ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:233–236.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beck AT. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hisli N. A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory. Turkish J Psychol. 1988;6:118–123.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barsky AJ, Wyshak G, Klerman GL. The somatosensory amplification scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis. J Psychiatry Res. 1990;24:323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gulec H, Sayar K. Reliability and validity of the Turkish form of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;61:25–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spielberger CDGR, Lushene RE. Manual for State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. California: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1970.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oner N, Le Compte A. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Hand Book. Istanbul: Bogazici University; 1985.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: a study of a patients with romatoid disorder (Turkish). İlac ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:102–106.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gr Locke, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton Lr. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1448–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kitapcioglu G, Mandiracioglu A, Bor S. Psychometric and methodological characteristics of a culturally adjusted gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire. Diseases Esophagus. 2004;17:228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guz H, Ay M, Dilbaz N. Alexithymia, depression and anxiety levels in a group of dermatologic patients (Turkish). Dusunen Adam. 2000;13:161–165.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gulec MYHÇ, Gokce M, Sayar K. Alexithymia, irritability and amplification of somatic symptoms in non-cardiac chest pain (Turkish). Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2007;8:14–21.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kennedy BL, Schwab JJ, Morris RL, Beldia G. Assessment of state and trait anxiety in subjects with anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychiatry Q. 2001;72:263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    American Psychiatric Association. Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W. Management of functional somatic syndromes. Lancet. 2007;369:946–955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Simon GE, VonKorff M, Piccinelli M, Fullerton C, Ormel J. An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1329–1335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haug TT, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The association between anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms in a large population: the HUNT-II study. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:845–851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haug TT, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. Are anxiety and depression related to gastrointestinal symptoms in the general population? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:294–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Choi JY, Jung HK, Song EM, Shim KN, Jung SA. Determinants of symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: nonerosive reflux disease, symptomatic, and silent erosive reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:764–771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schey R, Fass R. Current perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of functional esophageal disorders. Current GERD Reports. 2007;1:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Revicki DA, Wood M, Maton PN, Sorensen S. The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Med. 1998;104:252–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1377–1390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Melih Bilgi
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Rukiye Vardar
    • 3
    • 4
  • Esra Yıldırım
    • 3
    • 4
  • Baybars Veznedaroğlu
    • 2
  • Serhat Bor
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Izmir Bozyaka Educational and Research HospitalIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, School of MedicineEge UniversityBornovaTurkey
  3. 3.Division of Gastroenterology, School of MedicineEge UniversityBornovaTurkey
  4. 4.Ege Reflux GroupIzmirTurkey
  5. 5.Karabaglar State ClinicsKarabaglarTurkey

Personalised recommendations