Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 806–813 | Cite as

The Diagnostic Yield of Site and Symptom-Based Biopsies for Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A 5-Year Retrospective Review

  • Daniel WildEmail author
  • Anthony D. Sung
  • Diana Cardona
  • Constance Cirricione
  • Keith Sullivan
  • Claire Detweiler
  • Michael Shealy
  • Bryan Balmadrid
  • Krista L. Rowes
  • Nelson Chao
  • Sadhna Piryani
  • Hossein Mehdikhani Karimabad
  • Paul Martin
  • Martin Poleski
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) complicates half of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCT), and the gastrointestinal tract is commonly affected. Endoscopic biopsies have a key role in the diagnosis. The optimal procedure(s) to perform and site(s) to biopsy remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the charts of all adult patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at Duke University Medical Center between 1/1/05 and 1/1/11 and extracted data from those who underwent endoscopic biopsy for suspected GVHD. All histology was re-evaluated by blinded pathologists using 2006 NIH diagnostic criteria and then compared to the original clinical diagnosis of GVHD.

Results

A total of 169 adult patients underwent 250 endoscopic procedures to evaluate GVHD. The sensitivity of biopsies for clinical GVHD was 76 and 72 % for upper and lower tract sites, respectively. In the presence of nausea, upper tract biopsies were positive for GVHD in 65 %, 70 % while lower tract biopsies were positive in 61–70 %. In the presence of diarrhea, lower tract biopsies were positive in 65 %, while upper tract sites were positive in 64–69 %. Twenty six (40 %) of the sixty-five endoscopies that simultaneously sampled upper and lower tract sites had discordant results. All were histologically positive for GVHD, yet 15 % of upper tract biopsies and 25 % of lower tract biopsies were negative.

Conclusions

In this large review, the overall sensitivity of biopsies taken during EGD and Flex-Sig was 76 and 72 %, respectively. A symptom-driven biopsy approach was not clearly supported as upper tract and lower tract biopsies were similarly diagnostic for GVHD regardless of symptoms.

Keywords

Graft-versus-host disease Hematopoietic stem cell transplant Endoscopic biopsies Histology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the following additional contributors to this study: Leroy Moriuchi, Kelly Corbet, CJ Paarz-Largay, Matthew Chung, and Zhiguo Li. This paper was supported by the following grants: NIH T32 HL007057-37 (ADS) and the American Society of Hematology Research Training Award for Fellows (ADS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Iqbal N, Salzman D, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:982–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ponec RJ, Hackman RC, McDonald GB. Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of intestinal graft- versus-host disease after marrow transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:612–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snover DC, Weisdorf SA, et al. A histopathologic study of gastric and small intestinal graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Human Path. 1985;15:387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy J, Snover D, Weisdorf S, et al. Simultaneous upper and lower endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host. Transplantation. 1991;51:642–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson B, Salzman D, Steinhauer J, et al. Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006;38:371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ross WA, Ghosh S, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:982–989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu C-F, Zhu L-X. Endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:2262–2267.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nydegger A, Catto-Smith AG, FRACP, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease—Is rectal biopsy enough? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:561–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, Achem SR, et al. Complications of endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a single-center experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramakrishna J, Treem WR, et al. Duodenal hematoma as a complication of endoscopic biopsy in pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients. J Pediatric Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;25:426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipson SA, Perr HA, Koerper MA, et al. Intramural duodenal hematoma after endoscopic biopsy in leukemic patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:620–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quine MA, Bell GD, McCloy RF, Charlton JE, Devlin HB, Hopkins A. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut. 1995;36:462.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE, Benjamin SB. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ, et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: II. Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2006;12:31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shulman HM, Cardona DM, Greenson JK, et al. NIH Consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: II. The 2014 Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham J, Janin A, Gornet JM, et al. Clinical severity scores in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2014;97:965–971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crowell KR, Patel RA, Fluchel M, et al. Endoscopy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease: is lower endoscopy with biopsy as effective in diagnosis as upper endoscopy combined with lower endoscopy? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:1798–1800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Wild
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anthony D. Sung
    • 2
  • Diana Cardona
    • 3
  • Constance Cirricione
    • 4
  • Keith Sullivan
    • 2
  • Claire Detweiler
    • 3
  • Michael Shealy
    • 3
  • Bryan Balmadrid
    • 5
  • Krista L. Rowes
    • 2
  • Nelson Chao
    • 2
  • Sadhna Piryani
    • 2
  • Hossein Mehdikhani Karimabad
    • 2
  • Paul Martin
    • 2
  • Martin Poleski
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of GastroenterologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Division of Hematology-OncologyDuke Cancer InstituteDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Division of PathologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Division of BiostatisticsDuke Cancer InstituteDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Division of GastroenterologyHarborview Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations