Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 11, pp 2721–2729 | Cite as

Prevalence of Uninvestigated Dyspepsia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Korea: A Population-Based Study Using the Rome III Criteria

  • Byung-Hoon Min
  • Kyu Chan HuhEmail author
  • Hye-Kyung Jung
  • Young Hoon Yoon
  • Kee Don Choi
  • Kyung Ho Song
  • Bora Keum
  • Jung Won Kim
  • Functional Dyspepsia Study Group of Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Original Article



There have been few population-based studies on the prevalences of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia using Rome III criteria in Asian countries.


A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted by telephone interviews of 5,000 Koreans between the ages of 20–69 years. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed by a translated Korean version of Rome III criteria. Uninvestigated dyspepsia (UID) was defined by symptom criteria of Rome III. GERD was defined by troublesome heartburn and/or acid regurgitation occurring at least once a week. The EQ5D assessment tool was used for the evaluation of quality of life.


The prevalences of UID, postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) were 7.7, 5.6, and 4.2 %, respectively. Overlap between PDS and EPS was found in 27.1 % (104/384) of subjects with UID. There were no significant differences in demographic variables between patients with PDS and EPS. The prevalence of GERD was 7.1 %. Overlap between GERD and UID was found in 50.0 % of GERD patients. The EQ5D index of patients without either UID or GERD was 0.92 ± 0.07, and those of patients with only UID, with only GERD, and with both UID and GERD were 0.88 ± 0.09, 0.88 ± 0.11, and 0.84 ± 0.15, respectively.


GERD and UID based on Rome III criteria were prevalent and significantly affected the quality of life in Korea. In Korean patients with UID, there was considerable overlap and there were no significant differences in demographic variables between PDS and EPS.


Dyspepsia Gastroesophageal reflux disease Prevalence Epidemiology 



This work was supported by a Grant from Dong-A ST. Authors had complete access to the data that supports the publication.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Ho KY, Kang JY, Seow A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in a multiracial Asian population, with particular reference to reflux-type symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1816–1822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu CL, Lang HC, Chang FY, et al. Prevalence and health/social impacts of functional dyspepsia in Taiwan: a study based on the Rome criteria questionnaire survey assisted by endoscopic exclusion among a physical check-up population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:402–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tack J, Talley NJ, Camilleri M, et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1466–1479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–1920; quiz 1943.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005;54:710–717.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong BC, Kinoshita Y. Systematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:398–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SY, Lee KJ, Kim SJ, Cho SW. Prevalence and risk factors for overlaps between gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Digestion. 2009;79:196–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang SY, Lee OY, Bak YT, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and uninvestigated dyspepsia in Korea: a population-based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:188–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim SL, Goh WT, Lee JM, Ng TP, Ho KY. Changing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux with changing time: longitudinal study in an Asian population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:995–1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aro P, Talley NJ, Ronkainen J, et al. Anxiety is associated with uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia (Rome III criteria) in a Swedish population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zagari RM, Law GR, Fuccio L, et al. Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia and subgroups in the Italian general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1302–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mak AD, Wu JC, Chan Y, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Lee S. Dyspepsia is strongly associated with major depression and generalised anxiety disorder—a community study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:800–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang A, Liao X, Xiong L, et al. The clinical overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on Rome III criteria. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choung RS, Locke GR, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Do distinct dyspepsia subgroups exist in the community? A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1983–1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vakil N, Halling K, Ohlsson L, Wernersson B. Symptom overlap between postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndromes of the Rome III dyspepsia classification. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:767–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsu YC, Liou JM, Yang TH, et al. Proton pump inhibitor versus prokinetic therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia: is therapeutic response predicted by Rome III subgroups? J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:183–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohara S, Kawano T, Kusano M, Kouzu T. Survey on the prevalence of GERD and FD based on the Montreal definition and the Rome III criteria among patients presenting with epigastric symptoms in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:603–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mosca L, Hammond G, Mochari-Greenberger H, Towfighi A, Albert MA. Fifteen-year trends in awareness of heart disease in women: results of a 2012 American Heart Association National Survey. Circulation. 2013;127:1254–1263, e1251–e1229.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Myung SK, Seo HG, Cheong YS, Park S, Lee WB, Fong GT. Association of sociodemographic factors, smoking-related beliefs, and smoking restrictions with intention to quit smoking in Korean adults: findings from the ITC Korea Survey. J Epidemiol. 2012;22:21–27.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Song KH, Jung HK, Min BH, et al. Development and validation of the Korean Rome III Questionnaire for diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:509–515.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang EJ, Park HJ, Kim NY. A valuation of health status using EQ-5D. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2006;12:19–43.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Korean Ministry of Security and Public Administration. 2012.
  24. 24.
    Hu WH, Wong WM, Lam CL, et al. Anxiety but not depression determines health care-seeking behaviour in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:2081–2088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hong SJ, Sung IK, Kim JG, et al. Failure of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of H. pylori eradication in H. pylori-infected patients with functional dyspepsia. Gut Liver. 2011;5:468–471.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manabe N, Haruma K, Hata J, et al. Clinical characteristics of Japanese dyspeptic patients: is the Rome III classification applicable? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:567–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choung RS, Locke GR, III, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Overlap of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux in the general population: one disease or distinct entities? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:229–234, e106.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tack J, Caenepeel P, Arts J, Lee KJ, Sifrim D, Janssens J. Prevalence of acid reflux in functional dyspepsia and its association with symptom profile. Gut. 2005;54:1370–1376.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Talley NJ, Meineche-Schmidt V, Pare P, et al. Efficacy of omeprazole in functional dyspepsia: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (the bond and opera studies). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:1055–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia in a multiethnic population in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2210–2216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tougas G, Chen Y, Hwang P, Liu MM, Eggleston A. Prevalence and impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Canadian population: findings from the DIGEST study. Domestic/International gastroenterology surveillance study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2845–2854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wildner-Christensen M, Hansen JM, De Muckadell OB. Risk factors for dyspepsia in a general population: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cigarette smoking and unemployment are more important than Helicobacter pylori infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carey RN, Reid A, Driscoll TR, Glass DC, Benke G, Fritschi L. An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:1417–1421.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koepsell TD, McGuire V, Longstreth WT Jr, Nelson LM, van Belle G. Randomized trial of leaving messages on telephone answering machines for control recruitment in an epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:704–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Majowicz SE, Edge VL, Flint J, et al. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2004;30:121–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byung-Hoon Min
    • 1
  • Kyu Chan Huh
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hye-Kyung Jung
    • 3
  • Young Hoon Yoon
    • 4
  • Kee Don Choi
    • 5
  • Kyung Ho Song
    • 2
  • Bora Keum
    • 6
  • Jung Won Kim
    • 7
  • Functional Dyspepsia Study Group of Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Internal MedicineKonyang University College of MedicineDaejeonKorea
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineEwha Woman’s University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  5. 5.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  6. 6.Department of Internal MedicineKorea University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  7. 7.Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of MedicineKoshin University HospitalBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations