Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 10, pp 2536–2543 | Cite as

Endoscopic Resection for Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: Focusing on Histologic Discrepancies Between Forceps Biopsy-Based and Endoscopic Resection Specimen-Based Diagnosis

  • Byung-Hoon Min
  • Ki Joo Kang
  • Jun Haeng LeeEmail author
  • Eun Ran Kim
  • Yang Won Min
  • Poong-Lyul Rhee
  • Jae J. Kim
  • Jong Chul Rhee
  • Kyoung-Mee Kim
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Before endoscopic resection (ER), a considerable number of undifferentiated early gastric cancer (UD-EGC) cases were initially diagnosed as atypical glands, dysplasia, or differentiated EGC (D-EGC) based on forceps biopsy specimens. As UD-EGC carries a high risk of resection margin involvement, identifying the predictive factors for UD-EGC cases with histologic discrepancy (HD) is of clinical importance.

Aims

To investigate the outcomes of ER for UD-EGC and to identify the predictive factors for UD-EGC with HD.

Methods

Among 2,194 EGC lesions treated by ER, 59 lesions were finally diagnosed as UD-EGC and 50 UD-EGC cases showed HD. The demographic and endoscopic characteristics were compared between D-EGC and UD-EGC with HD, and the predictive factors for the latter were investigated among cases of forceps biopsy-based diagnosis of atypical glands, dysplasia, or D-EGC.

Results

UD-EGC showed significantly higher rate of lateral margin involvement compared to D-EGC (18.6 vs. 3.4 %). Among the UD-EGC cases meeting the expanded criteria and not involving additional surgery, no local or extragastric tumor recurrence was observed during the median follow-up of 27.5 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (≤60 years), female gender, gastric body, flat or depressed type, and tumor size (>2 cm) were independent predictive factors for UD-EGC with HD among cases of forceps biopsy-based diagnosis of atypical glands, dysplasia, or D-EGC.

Conclusions

For lesions with predictive factors for UD-EGC with HD, a circumferential mapping biopsy before ER or wide marking during ER could be considered to avoid the potential risk of incomplete resection.

Keywords

Undifferentiated cancer Histologic discrepancy Endoscopic resection Clinical outcome 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee HJ, Yang HK, Ahn YO. Gastric cancer in Korea. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:177–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi IJ. Gastric cancer screening and diagnosis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2009;54:67–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Ono S, Omata M. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria. Endoscopy. 2009;41:118–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut. 2009;58:331–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, et al. 1,635 Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1000–1008.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Youn JC, Youn YH, Kim TI, et al. Factors affecting long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:643–647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirasawa T, Gotoda T, Miyata S, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:148–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ha TK, An JY, Youn HK, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. Indication for endoscopic mucosal resection in early signet ring cell gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:508–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000;3:219–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamao T, Shirao K, Ono H, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis from intramucosal gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:602–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okada K, Fujisaki J, Yoshida T, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44:122–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park CH, Shin S, Park JC, et al. Long-term outcome of early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: expanded indication is comparable to absolute indication. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:651–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ninomiya Y, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y, Tomimatsu H. Unrecognizable intramucosal spread of diffuse-type mucosal gastric carcinomas of less than 20 mm in size. Endoscopy. 2000;32:604–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park JS, Hong SJ, Han JP, et al. Early-stage gastric cancers represented as dysplasia in a previous forceps biopsy: the importance of clinical management. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:170–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, et al. Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:91–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim JH, Kim SH, Park WH, et al. Predictable factors of histologic discrepancy of gastric cancer between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic treatment specimen. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:354–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Won CS, Cho MY, Kim HS, et al. Upgrade of lesions initially diagnosed as low-grade gastric dysplasia upon forceps biopsy following endoscopic resection. Gut Liver. 2011;5:187–193.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH, et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1507–1513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang HY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:509–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee H, Yun WK, Min BH, et al. A feasibility study on the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1985–1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Min BH, Lee JH, Kim JJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating early gastric cancer: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting (EMR-P). Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:201–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JH, Lee YC, Kim H, et al. Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:e1–e9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katsube T, Konnno S, Hamaguchi K, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection in the diagnosis and treatment of group III gastric lesions. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:3513–3516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K. Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2009;41:462–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bok GH, Jeon SR, Cho JY, et al. The accuracy of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy versus conventional endoscopic biopsies for the diagnosis of superficial gastric neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:899–908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kosaka T, Endo M, Toya Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective study. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:183–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gotoda T, Iwasaki M, Kusano C, Seewald S, Oda I. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria. Br J Surg. 2010;97:868–871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byung-Hoon Min
    • 1
  • Ki Joo Kang
    • 2
  • Jun Haeng Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eun Ran Kim
    • 1
  • Yang Won Min
    • 1
  • Poong-Lyul Rhee
    • 1
  • Jae J. Kim
    • 1
  • Jong Chul Rhee
    • 1
  • Kyoung-Mee Kim
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Hallym University College of Medical SchoolHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyangKorea
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations