Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 201–213

Prediction of the Postoperative Prognosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): Importance of Preoperatively-Determined Anatomic Invasion Level and Number of Tumors

  • Shigeru Marubashi
  • Kunihito Gotoh
  • Hidenori Takahashi
  • Hiroaki Ohigashi
  • Masahiko Yano
  • Osamu Ishikawa
  • Masato Sakon
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Preoperative prediction of the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) following surgical treatment remains quite difficult and controversial. We attempted to identify the preoperative and postoperative predictors of the overall survival rates in patients with ICC in order to clarify the appropriate indications for surgical resection of ICC.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features of ICC and outcome of surgical resection in 111 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between 1980 and March 2012. Both preoperative factors and operatively confirmed factors were evaluated as potential risk factors for determination of the post-surgical prognosis.

Results

Curative resection (R0) was performed in 72 patients (64.9 %). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.0 and 59.7 % in the R0 group. Two preoperative factors [hilar invasion as recognized by computed tomography (HR 3.16, P = 0.020) and multiple intrahepatic tumors (HR 7.09, P = 0.0002)] and two operatively confirmed factors [multiple intrahepatic tumors (HR 9.17, P = 0.0009) and lymph node metastasis as confirmed by final histology (HR 6.41, P = 0.003)] were identified as significant risk factors adversely influencing the overall survival rate after surgery. Furthermore, solitary, small (<5 cm) and peripheral ICCs were associated with a very low probability of lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions

Preoperatively diagnosed hilar invasion, multiple intrahepatic tumors and histologically confirmed lymph node metastasis were the main determinants of an adverse postoperative prognosis in patients with ICC. Lymph node dissection could be omitted for patients with solitary, small and peripheral ICCs.

Keywords

Risk factor Preoperative diagnosis Postoperative prognosis Lymph node dissection Recurrence 

Abbreviations

AST

Asparate aminotransferase

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

CA19-9

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

CBD

Common bile duct

CEA

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CT

Computed tomography

GGT

Gamma-glutamyltransferase

ICC

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PET–CT

Positron emission tomography–computed tomography

PT

Prothrombin time

References

  1. 1.
    Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2005;366:1303–1314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1368–1378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Extent of resection and outcome after curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002;11:969–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32:2675–2680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen WF, Zhong W, Xu F, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of 429 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5976–5982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uchiyama K, Yamamoto M, Yamaue H, et al. Impact of nodal involvement on surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the Study Group for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:443–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ercolani G, Vetrone G, Grazi GL, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: primary liver resection and aggressive multimodal treatment of recurrence significantly prolong survival. Ann Surg. 2010;252:107–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shen WF, Zhong W, Liu Q, Sui CJ, Huang YQ, Yang JM. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative surgery: retrospective control study. World J Surg. 2011;35:2083–2091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:651–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morise Z, Sugioka A, Tokoro T, et al. Surgery and chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2011;2:58–64.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abe K, Wakatsuki T, Katsushima F, et al. A case of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma successfully treated with chemosensitivity test-guided systemic chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5228–5231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:1101–1107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawarada Y, Mizumoto R. Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver. Hepatogastroenterology. 1990;37:176–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen CL, Chen YS, Chen MC. Prognostic factors of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:40–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T, Ueno K, Nakano M. Does gross appearance indicate prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Surg Oncol. 1998;69:162–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shimada M, Yamashita Y, Aishima S, Shirabe K, Takenaka K, Sugimachi K. Value of lymph node dissection during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1463–1466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Isa T, Kusano T, Shimoji H, Takeshima Y, Muto Y, Furukawa M. Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;181:507–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S, Yamamoto T, Yamazaki O, Kinoshita H. Clinicopathological factors predicting outcome after resection of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:969–974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uenishi T, Hirohashi K, Kubo S, et al. Histologic factors affecting prognosis following hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:865–869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, Yokoi Y, et al. Clinicopathological prognostic factors and impact of surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2002;26:687–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kawarada Y, Yamagiwa K, Das BC. Analysis of the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and survival time in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2002;183:679–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakagohri T, Asano T, Kinoshita H, et al. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar-invasive and peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2003;27:289–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Ito T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:432–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kubo S, Uenishi T, Yamamoto S, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas of mass-forming type. Hepatol Res. 2004;29:223–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shirabe K, Shimada M, Tsujita E, et al. Prognostic factors in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with special reference to angiogenesis. Am J Surg. 2004;187:538–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, et al. Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:728–733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puhalla H, Schuell B, Pokorny H, Kornek GV, Scheithauer W, Gruenberger T. Treatment and outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:173–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miwa S, Miyagawa S, Kobayashi A, et al. Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:893–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Ojima H. Surgical outcomes of the mass-forming plus periductal infiltrating types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study with the typical mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2007;31:2016–2022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Ojima H. Clinical impact of the surgical margin status in hepatectomy for solitary mass-forming type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without lymph node metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:160–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Choi SB, Kim KS, Choi JY, et al. The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3048–3056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tamandl D, Kaczirek K, Gruenberger B, et al. Lymph node ratio after curative surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2009;96:919–925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after surgical resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1247–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Sgourakis G, et al. Operations for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: single-institution experience of 158 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:218–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shimada K, Sano T, Nara S. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection during hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma with negative lymph node involvement. Surgery. 2009;145:411–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jiang BG, Ge RL, Sun LL, Zong M, Wei GT, Zhang YJ. Clinical parameters predicting survival duration after hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:603–608.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morine Y, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Clinical impact of lymph node dissection in surgery for peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today. 2012;42:147–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–3145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sotiropoulos GC, Miyazaki M, Konstadoulakis MM, et al. Multicentric evaluation of a clinical and prognostic scoring system predictive of survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Liver Int. 2010;30:996–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Feydy A, Vilgrain V, Denys A, et al. Helical CT assessment in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:73–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kluge R, Schmidt F, Caca K, et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer. Hepatology. 2001;33:1029–1035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Seo S, Hatano E, Higashi T, et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts lymph node metastasis, P-glycoprotein expression, and recurrence after resection in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2008;143:769–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y, Makuuchi M. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007;245:909–922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhou L, Rui JA, Wang SB, Chen SG, Qu Q. LCSGJ-T classification, 6th or 5th edition TNM staging did not independently predict the long-term prognosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy. J Surg Res. 2009;159:538–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, Sueda T. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological differences between peripheral type and hilar type. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:540–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Hoshino H, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET for lymph node metastasis and outcome of surgery for biliary cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:223–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeru Marubashi
    • 1
  • Kunihito Gotoh
    • 1
  • Hidenori Takahashi
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Ohigashi
    • 1
  • Masahiko Yano
    • 1
  • Osamu Ishikawa
    • 1
  • Masato Sakon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular DiseasesOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations